"Biden took an important *but limited* step Wednesday toward a genuine investigation into the origins of covid..He issued..order directing..intelligence agencies to 'redouble..efforts' to look into..two competing hypotheses about..source of the pandemic"

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
"But this represents just one aspect of a growing U.S. government and congressional effort to finally try — as best we can — to get to the bottom of how the pandemic started."
"Biden’s officials..insist Biden himself always believed the lab accident theory was plausible and needed investigation. Even so, there’s concern on Capitol Hill that the White House may use the new investigation to thwart several ongoing inquiries by lawmakers."
"Over the next 90 days, this investigation..should examine any and all information on the Wuhan Institute of Virology held by..NIH..USAID..DoD..DHS..and NSF. The list also includes the nonprofit organization EcoHealth Alliance, which channeled U.S. funding to the Wuhan lab."
"On Tuesday, the Senate unanimously passed an amendment that would ban all US government funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology..In the House, Democratic leaders are now openly calling for a public investigation into the lab leak theory."
"Along the way we need to completely rethink how we manage oversight of..labs..Put simply, it has become..clear....labs.., which have a record of safety lapses, operate with little transparency and zero accountability, which means they present a..risk that must be mitigated."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard H. Ebright

Richard H. Ebright Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @R_H_Ebright

29 May
"Today, there are nearly 60 maximum containment facilities..planned, under construction, or in operation around the world..[H]alf have been established
in the last decade. This means potential risks are proliferating. "

BSL4 labs are booming
static1.squarespace.com/static/6048d7a…
"Work with high-risk pathogens carries substantive safety risks to laboratory workers, the wider society, and the environment. A lab worker may be accidentally infected by a pathogen, causing disease in the individual, and potentially also in..the wider community."
"A pathogen may also be accidentally released directly into the environment through a lab containment breach, leading to potential spread of disease in the community."
Read 6 tweets
29 May
Fauci: "[C]onsider..hypothetical scenario:..gain-of-function experiment involving a virus with..pandemic potential is performed..by experienced investigators, but..information..is..used by another scientist who does not have..same training and facilities"

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Fauci" "[W]hat if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?"
Fauci: “Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario–however remote–should the initial experiments have been performed in the first place..? I have said that the benefits of such experiments..outweigh the risks."
Read 4 tweets
28 May
"The search for answers about the origins of Covid-19 has focused global attention on a corner of science that previously operated far from public view. Known as 'gain of function', the research involves manipulating pathogens..to make them more lethal."

ft.com/content/7fef48…
"Critics say the risk of the pathogens escaping and sparking a pandemic is too great"
"Irrespective of whether the Covid-19 pandemic was a result of a lab leak, the very fact that such an outcome is plausible means this is a category of research we should not have been funding or helping to carry out,"
Read 5 tweets
27 May
"The turning point, ironically, was the 'press conference' on 9 February in Wuhan where a team of western scientists representing the WHO sat meekly through a 3-hour propaganda session at the end of a 12-day study tour."
spectator.co.uk/article/the-co…
"Strictly chaperoned throughout, the western scientists (approved by..Chinese government) had mainly listened to presentations by their Chinese colleagues during their visit and done no research themselves. Yet the result was presented..the world as if it was..WHO’s conclusion."
"So risible was this little stage play that even WHO’s director-general, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, had to backtrack a few days later..The governments of Britain, America and 12 other countries issued a joint statement expressing 'shared concerns' over the study."
Read 4 tweets
27 May
If the Lab-Leak Theory Is Right, What’s Next?

We know enough to acknowledge that the scenario is possible, and we should therefore act as though it’s true.

theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
"[L]et’s stipulate that pandemics can result from natural spillovers or from laboratory accidents—and then let’s move along to implications."
"Should scientists be fiddling with pathogenic genomes, to measure out the steps they’d have to take before ascending to pandemic-level virulence?"

"Should the NIH be funding them?"

(Answers: No and No.)
Read 10 tweets
26 May
"Many threads of investigation are available in US and would be accessible to a Congressional inquiry with subpoena power..But only congressional Democrats hold that power—and they show no intention of using it."

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
"Of course, the Biden administration could release the intelligence in its possession and direct its agencies to answer legitimate congressional inquiries right now — but it hasn’t."
"US government agencies are ignoring or resisting congressional attempts to seek answers."
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(