Justice Breyer is teaching a National Constitution Center class right now and he's...enjoying himself
Breyer, on how to foster compromise and effective government: "I am basically optimistic and I don't know if that's justified."
"If you need Republican support, talk to them. 'My friend, what do you think?' Get them talking and they'll eventually say something you agree with."
"The rule of law is: follow it even when it's wrong."
"What about ideology? Are you an Adam Smith acolyte or a Maoist troublemaker?"
It isn't terrible if you have a Supreme Court with different values and different jurisprudential views. "God, life is a mess. Let's not try to do too much too quickly."
"It's a little more complicated than that."
Think of the Warren court and its desire to get the country desegregated. Maybe that's why they didn't take Loving v. Virginia for a while.
On balance, the Court is not about politics. But it's not the case that when someone asks if the Court is political, that the answer is "no, not in any sense whatever".
The purpose of law: try to get the people to live better, together.
"Why is precedent important?" asks Jeff Rosen
Breyer: gotta be careful overturning previous rulings but you have to do it sometimes (Brown v. Board)
Need to guard against the "insidious way of thinking" where justices overrule decisions whenever they can.
"Try to keep a decent character. That's also corny."
"I do some of that fake bike-riding in the afternoon."
I think Breyer just told us he has a Peloton.
I believe Breyer just said he prays the Amidah.
More Camus references now from Breyer. And he knows he's been citing The Plague a lot. "In about 15 talks", he said.
Breyer on Proust: humans beings impose form on things, which is why it matters so much what you see when you're a child.
Breyer: my upbringing ("I remember WW2") shaped who I have become.
Breyer on JL Austin's "How to Do Things With Words" - how to fight for a pragmatic, not a textual, method of statutory interpretation.
Breyer's favorite opinions: Glossip v. Gross dissent (death penalty) and Parents Involved dissent (student assignment policies to racially integrate schools)
Breyer now animatedly dishing on architecture & helping to design the 1st circuit's courthouse
On having colleagues with whom he disagrees: "I've never heard a voice raised in anger. I've never heard people say mean things about each other."
On Justice Ginsburg: "I miss her."
Says he recently he told a clerk, "let's go see what Ruth thinks" before catching himself. "There you are," he said, shaking his head sadly. "There you are."
Oy the students want to find out how to become a Supreme Court justice.
"I love my clerks. They keep me on my toes."
OK it's been a long week and someone's getting cheeky
And that's a wrap: Tocqueville, compromise, Peloton, pragmatism, optimism, Camus, RBG, rule of law, Proust, courthouse architecture
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
First ruling is United States v. Palomar-Santiago, an immigration case. Unanimous opinion written by Justice Sotomayor supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
Another 9th circuit reversal. Can't immediately think of a recent Supreme Court decision where a 9th circuit ruling was affirmed
At least one more opinion coming this morning, so stay tuned.
The (very large) SCOTUS reform commission is meeting right now for the very first time. They're all unmuted and taking their oath and it's quite the chorus.
Now they're recording voice votes on accepting the bylaws. Everybody is saying yes so far, except for @WilliamBaude, who said "aye".
A couple of absences today: @Sifill_LDF and @tribelaw and a few others. Their plan: six meetings over the next six months, including two with testimony from members of the public.
My 4pm radio hit on today's abortion grant was a casualty of CA's mask mandate extension, so here's a bit of what I was going to say. Roe v Wade is in v big trouble, but there is a lot of murkiness ahead. THREAD
First: there's no reason four justices would vote to hear Dobbs unless they believed it to be a vehicle for eroding abortion rights. There's no circuit split & the MS law is obviously unconstitutional under existing SCOTUS precedent (Roe, Casey).
Second: while Dobbs does not explicitly ask the Court to overrule Casey or Roe, the question on which the Court granted cert implicates the core holding of both precedents—that pre-viability abortion bans are unconstitutional.
Key moment in yesterday's student-speech hearing at SCOTUS: Justice Kagan asking Lisa Blatt about lower court rulings that interpret Tinker v. Des Moines in ways that greatly weaken speech protections
This is crucial: Blatt's central argument is that halting school regulation of student speech outside the schoolhouse gate is unnecessary to let kids express themselves freely. Controversial political and other forms of speech will still be protected under Tinker, Blatt insists.
But as Kagan notes, a district court in 2007 upheld a principal's ban on students wearing t-shirts w the message "We Are Not Criminals" (protesting an immigration bill) b/c it may have caused fights.
Here's that ruling, Madrid v. Anthony: casetext.com/case/madrid-v-…