The piece starts to make an argument then just gives up and ends up a saggy mess
It’s a load of incoherent badly reasoned gibberish - I had three thoughts, and they are weak so basically I’ll retreat to dogma
It’s a load of incoherent badly reasoned gibberish - I had three thoughts, and they are weak so basically I’ll retreat to dogma
https://twitter.com/botanygeek/status/1398350447434469379
The use of the State of Nature report and blaming everything on past subsidy schemes is shameless tosh
And there is no coherent thought about whether free trade will drive down prices and increase the forces that the State of Nature report highlights that destroy biodiversity
And there is no coherent thought about whether free trade will drive down prices and increase the forces that the State of Nature report highlights that destroy biodiversity
And I am literally laughing at the idea that exporting our food needs is good for the environment
It’s almost like our leading newspapers belong to rich people that want disaster capitalism - and will hire anyone who can write a sentence to try and defend their insanities
It’s almost like our leading newspapers belong to rich people that want disaster capitalism - and will hire anyone who can write a sentence to try and defend their insanities
It is simply untrue
British farmers are more efficient than most others we import from - the Sustainable Food Trust did a blog on the stats for this
When we export an acre of British production abroad to many countries it is something like two acres there needed
British farmers are more efficient than most others we import from - the Sustainable Food Trust did a blog on the stats for this
When we export an acre of British production abroad to many countries it is something like two acres there needed
And it’s often from places with pristine and previously not farmed habitats like the Amazon so devastating for biodiversity
These people don’t even know their basic shit
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
