As this month of May ends, sounder people reflect on its upheavals, including that ultimate "Ingrate Boomer" moment, May 1968, when feral students etal protested & rioted in, of all places, France, and against all people, the greatest French President, General Charles de Gaulle.
One of many reasons why General & then President Charles de Gaulle is so crucial a figure in French history is that he understood his role, as the leader of WW2's Free French, was to, 'Reconcile the Right with the French Republic and the Left with the French nation.' #MyPresident
As so often happens, it seems, in the 1960s, esp France, the generation that went through WW2, often raised in or around the carnage of WW1, had a massive cultural gap with some in what are now Boomers, who would scoff at their elders' culture and morals personified by de Gaulle
By May of 1968 - and you can read various accounts of grievances, real or imagined, among the soixante-huitard (68ers) - there were strikes and protests throughout France, often violent ones. What would become of France, again, threatened by such strife in its capital?
The French had by May 1968 had two centuries of almost constant revolution, war, uprising and, even, foreign occupations: 1815, 1871, World War II. The French had also had challenges in their Empire, from Algeria to Vietnam. The logic of President de Gaulle had been obvious.
In the prior decade, de Gaulle's main threat had been from his Right - the disgruntled, especially French officers, of the Secret Armed Organisation (OAS), who had resented/resisted France's relinquishing Algeria & even tried to organise de Gaulle's assasination in 1962.
But by May 1968, the real problems for the French Republic and for General de Gaulle as its President were all on his Left - and something had to be done, lest France fall, as so often it had since 1789, into further chaos, if not ruptures and civil war.
Thus the riots and disorder were so horrible that OTD in May 1968, President de Gaulle left France and flew to the French military HQ in Baden-Baden in Germany to meet General Jacques Massu....de Gaulle wanted to know if he had the Army's support if needed. Massu said, "Oui..."
To be continued ......
On this day in 1968, French President Charles de Gaulle, amid the May riots, dissolved the National Assembly, ordered new elections & threatened to institute a State of Emergency if protesters did not return to work. The Gaullists rallied in Paris in support of General de Gaulle
May 1968 ends with French war veterans, farmers, workers & loyal 'citoyens' from all over France, often carrying the French Resistance's historic Cross of Lorraine flag, coming to Paris to oppose the Left & rally in support of President Charles de Gaulle #MyPresident
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Social media bill is another very poorly drafted law from the very same people who drafted the Voice constitutional alteration (which failed) & the Misinformation/Disinformation bill (which was withdrawn). Sheer lunacy for the Coalition to support the social media bill #Auspol
One of many problems we have with our Parliament in 2024 is its membership is simply not across how modern economies & communications work - you do not have to be any expert but you do need some lay understanding. One saw this in the Misinformation/Disinformation bill #Auspol
As a matter of public law - which binds everyone & should be as simple to follow as law can - the social media bill has ridiculous complexity & carve-outs ... and it is unreal to legislate on social media access separate from AI & exposure to its knowledge & also 'fakes' #Auspol
I am finally watching the @martyrmade / Tucker discussion on Churchill. I am not sure who among the critics have actually watched it. As I dislike Twitter pile-ons, I think everyone should watch what X says before X is put in the tumbril. My response as a Churchillian below.
Firstly, it astounds me (and no doubt many in the old Empire) why Americans in 2024 are so invested in the British Empire in the 1930s when the Americans of the 1939-1941 period wanted no part of WW2 & the US had to be bombed into WW2 & it was the Nazis who declared war on the US
Secondly, there is very little Darryl says that was not said earlier by many Revisionist historians of the same period, esp British ones wondering why they went through two continental wars that cost them their vast seaborne empire - cf Alan Clark, John Charmley, AJP Taylor etal
US delaying arms & munitions to Israel is all about domestic US politics - US allies especially in the Middle East see Biden Admin wiling to dirk *even Israel* here means Egypt, Jordan, Gulf Kingdoms etal start to reevaluate relying on the US vs an Iranian arc with PRC/RUS ‘help’
Rightly or wrongly, the US' allies seeing that if the Biden WH will cut *even Israel* adrift on arms and munitions supplies in a war after a massive terrorist attack, that their alliance with the US, too, operates purely at the whim of domestic US politics ... Obama's 3rd term
A global military alliance of intelligence support & arms sharing (going to standardisation of kit & calibres etc) is only sustainable, ultimately, to the degree that allies trust in the support of each other, esp when the going is hard... no one respects disloyalty esp enemies
Putting Tucker to one side here .... weirdest part of Putin's villain role in the contemporary Western mind (admittedly an historically illiterate mind] is that if Putin dropped dead tomorrow, his successor would follow the same policies, probably more aggressively.
In July 2018, I wrote this piece, "The Sources Of Russian Conduct", on my blog, in an effort to put "The Russians" in some context for that part of the lay Western readership that was not totally brain damaged by America's internal convulsions
Reality is that the West will never be close to Russia - we will have bouts of accomodation & OK times - but we also have many friction points. But we will need a modus vivendi with Russia in space, Arctic, and esp as Russia spans 11 time zones & Eurasian landmass
I am shocked - shocked I tell you - that the same people who were (catastrophically) wrong about Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, etal, have now been proven wrong about the war in Ukraine ....
Twitter trying to work out whether Prigozhin is "for real" this time or whether he is a character from the Cyrillic production of Turkey's 2016 'not quite a coup' ... or an Ernst Rohm or Lin Biao...regardless a lesson taught in these regimes is to never overrate your usefulness.
A key change in how RUS state fought the UKR war over past 6-10 months was to move slowly from 'war on the cheap' (Luhansk/Donetk militias & Wagner) to mobilising Russian reserves + bringing in more of the regular Russian armed forces hence extensive prep for UKR offensive
On any view, Wagner in 2022 filled gaps the RUS state wanted filled-it provided combat power ivo Soledar & Bakhmut in late 2022/early 2023. At same time, regular RUS units were being filled out & commencing the sappering & digging in for the very slow UKR offensive we see now.