TNKPhDCFA Profile picture
May 29, 2021 18 tweets 6 min read Read on X
"I’m motivated by fear of what is going to happen to our world, to the fabric of our society. I’m worried about the future of my children. I want them to live in a free and liberal democracy - not in the totalitarian techno-medico-bureaucracy we’re heading into."
Those are the words of Nick Hudson, PANDA cofounder, from the Q&A portion of his BizNews talk that millions have watched yet was censored by YT (linked at end of thread).

Now that much of the Covid panic is fizzling out, we need to turn our attention to this underlying theme...
What is driving the censorship, the bad data, the psychological manipulation, the groupthink, the "wrongthink", the careless stripping of liberties and scientific mores?

Nick continues: "History is riddled with stories of how concessions to freedom and liberty rapidly evolve.."
"So we all have an ethical responsibility to push back against these encroachments. I do hope people are aware of the extent to which we are in a dangerous situation. You need to be thinking Stalin - that’s what we’re facing. We need to decentralize."
"The erosion of liberal values in countries that basically invented them is breathtaking."

Stop and think about that last sentence. It is 100% accurate. Is that something that should be supported? Has history ever demonstrated that such erosion leads to prosperity?
"The 3 M’s - Marxism, Malthusianism, and (post)Modernism. These are some of the most dangerous, toxic ideas that have ever haunted the planet. This is the territory of Stalin and Mao and Hitler. And it’s disguised - in words like inclusive growth, sustainability."
"Nice sounding words that hide dangerous doctrines - which are very convenient for those who want to centralize."

Collectivism: another nice-sounding word to the uninitiated. Look it up - it's where we're heading, and it's far from nice if you don't enjoy gulags.
"The problems here are all caused by these overtly centralized and suppressive organizations - the WHO, CDC. You can’t speak out. The mechanisms for error correction have been destroyed. They’re wrong about everything and no one’s allowed to say it."
"I talk about the unholy alliance between big tech, big pharma, and a very captured media - often owned or funded by big tech or big pharma. And these supranational organizations like the Gates foundation that are able to manipulate narratives."
"I don’t think there’s a conspiracy in the form of a meeting in a smoked filled room - but there’s a convergence of incentives."
"Lockdowns are the most regressive strategy that’s ever been invented. The wealthy have become much wealthier. Trillions of dollars of wealth have been transferred from the working class to wealthy people."
"We had the (pandemic response) guidelines. We even had the statements of principle detailing what evidence threshold is required to amend the guidelines. But in the space of 7 days all over the world those guidelines were torn up. And that has to be understood."
"We need to work out why public health officials all over the world went down this road. That’s not something we can just gloss over. And it’s not that we didn’t know - we did know - that’s why we had the guidelines."
So where does this leave us? While we may feel relief that the "overlords" are letting up on the panic-pushing and restrictions, the real battle is just beginning.
"I would not short change the effectiveness of network-based ideas. Can you start a nucleus of people in your company (or town) that are brought back to reality? And they influence other people around them."

Grassroots.
"That’s what’s required. McKay’s story about bringing people back to their senses one by one. That’s what needs to be done."
In case you wonder about PANDA's and Nick's incentives here (and you should always think about underlying incentives), go back to the first tweet.

Now compare to the incentives of those we must resist.
Video links - must see if you haven't already:
pandata.org/time-to-reopen…

@PanData19
@NickHudsonCT

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with TNKPhDCFA

TNKPhDCFA Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TTBikeFit

Apr 3, 2023
PCR test issues, summarized from our Twitter Spaces yesterday:🧵

👉PCR was never designed to diagnose a disease - it’s a lab test to find tiny amounts of rna for research purposes, and without clinical observations it is useless for diagnosis.

From the ThermoFisher manual:
👉 PCR test results drive all the other pandemic statistics: Cases, hospitalizations, fatalities, vax “efficacy.” They are also used to force quarantine, restrict travel, and shut down schools. Yet they were never meant to be used for broad surveillance.
👉 High CT PCR positives detect as little as a single copy of RNA - far higher amounts are required for a culturable or replication-competent infection. Presence of a tiny amount of RNA implies nothing about infection or infectiveness. “Asymptomatic infection” = oxymoron 🤡🌎
Read 7 tweets
Jun 27, 2022
My colleagues @ClareCraigPath and Dr Andrew Bostom (banned from Twitter) warned about the concerning heart damage signals a year ago. Key points apply to the recent Nature study too -> dailysceptic.org/archive/raisin…
“A 4x increase above baseline was evident in the seven days after the first dose for under-24 yo rising to over 27x for the 7days after the 2nd dose. The rate/M in males 12-17 was 17x higher than in men >50, 7days after the 1st dose, rising to 74x 7days after the second dose.”->
“For young and old it is not a clinically obvious diagnosis and it is likely that milder cases will have gone undiagnosed. Even for these mild cases, the long term outcome is unknown...Currently, more than half of the reports in VAERS are from patients under the age of 30. ->
Read 6 tweets
May 20, 2022
Do not arouse the wrath of the great and powerful FAUCI!

Terrifying!

But what is behind that green curtain?
Wait - who could it be?
Holy flying monkeys - it's NIH Head of Clinical "Bioethics" - Fauci's WIFE Christine Grady - in place for 12 years. Hmm, who knew? And why didn't we? It's not like there is any conflict there, right?
Read 7 tweets
Apr 7, 2022
💥State (RI) pediatric hospitalization data analyzed:

👉Only 1/3 of 0-18yrs Covid19 hospitalizations could possibly have been DUE TO C19.

@andrewbostom @ifihadastick and I have been looking at this ICD code data and there will be much more analysis to come. 1/6
Pop of RI 0-18 is ~220k. We also looked at flu hosps with primary dx of flu vs C19 hosps w primary dx U071 (=+C19 test). 100% of flu hosps had codes consistent w flu while only 56% of C19 primary dx were even possibly hosp DUE TO C19. 2/6
Looking at the ICD codes of these supposed pediatric C19 hospitalizations is shocking. There are children there w primary dx for attempted suicide, abuse, severe trauma, poisoning, cancer etc with a U071 Covid code thrown in.

💥folks these kids are not hospitalized for Covid 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Mar 31, 2022
These are the kinds of clowns that want to shut up anyone who dares question their approved narrative. Fact: a free society is built on open debate and free speech - never in history have the censors been the good guys. Censorship has never been for anyone’s good but the censors. Image
Gavin Yamey (Prof MD MPH!) is the poster boy for zero Covid nut jobs who have spent the last 2 years grifting for funds at your expense. He blocks anyone who disagrees rather than debating. He lies incessantly and moves to the next lie. No accountability in his echo chamber. Image
2 lies in that single tweet. Characterizing PANDA as “anti v” because we are are critical of the data and the unsupported assertions. 2nd, the GBD authors are not scientific advisors. Par for the course for these folk. Which is exactly why they love censorship. But looky here -> Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 18, 2022
Fun math exercise via El Gato Malo, prompted by the @CDCgov 's "adjustment" of it's C19 mortality data.

If the avg person gets 2x colds per year, even just mild feeling crappy stuff, if we were mass PCR testing >35Ct for "colds", How many "cases" do you think we would get? ->
Well now what if we counted any death for a month after your "+ cold PCR" as a "Cold death?"

That means for every person, there are 2 months out of 12 where they will flag as a "cold death." 17% of the year.

Since 2.9M die in the US annually, x17% equals 490k "cold deaths" ->
Now those are just 490,000 deaths, WITH a "positive cold test" in the past month. How many actually died FROM a cold? Some, but nowhere near all. This leaves out skewed risk in older folks, seasonality etc, but you get the point. ->
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(