Famous Quotes related to Great Reset
1924 -Montagu Norman, Governor of The Bank of England
“When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers.”
“When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers.”
1928 Edward Bernays famously described:
”The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organised habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society.
”The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organised habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society.
Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”
1945-Dr. G. Brock Chisholm, first director and later head of the World Health Organization of the United Nations in an address to psychiatrists and government officials in Washington, D.C confiding:
What basic psychological distortion can be found in every civilization of which we know anything? The only psychological force capable of producing these perversions is morality-the concept of right and wrong.
The re-interpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong are the belated objectives of nearly all psychotherapy."
1950-Banker Paul Warburg, testifying before the US Senate on February 17, 1950,
“We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”
“We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”
1951-Lord Bertrand Russell, who joined with the Frankfurt School in this effort at mass social engineering, explained the basis of the strategy, in his 1951 book, The Impact of Science on Society:
I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology.... Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda.
Of these the most influential is what is called “education.” Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema, and the radio play an increasing part....
It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment. ...
The subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship...
When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.
Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.
Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so
1951 quote by philosopher Hannah Arendt: “It has frequently been observed that terror can rule absolutely only over people who are isolated against each other and that therefore one of the primary concerns of a tyrannical government is to bring this isolation about.
Isolation may be the beginning of terror; it certainly is its most fertile ground; it always is its result. ....
This isolation is, as it were, pre-totalitarian; its hallmark is impotence insofar as power always comes from people acting together, acting in concert; isolated people are powerless by definition."
1952 Charles Galton Darwin’s The Next Million Years. Some quote
......a tame animal must have a master, and that therefore though it might conceivably be possible to tame the majority of mankind, this could only be done by leaving untamed a minority of the population. ...
......a tame animal must have a master, and that therefore though it might conceivably be possible to tame the majority of mankind, this could only be done by leaving untamed a minority of the population. ...
Moreover, this minority would have to be the group possessing the most superior qualities of all.
Most people - call them the sheep - follow the ideas of their leaders unquestioningly, but this minority - the goats - goes by contraries,...The goats are often not very pleasant people, but they are usually above the average of intelligence.
When homo sapiens is changing, it will not be by the whole race gaining simultaneously whatever qualities better fit it for survival, but rather by certain types of mankind proving superior to the rest in survival value,
Looking a little deeper there is the possibility of substantially altering the intellectual and moral natures of individuals by some sort of hormonal injections; already great effects have been produced in animals.
.
....a dictator should ever aspire to bring about some really permanent change in humanity, he could do it if, and only if, he knew how to alter some of the human genes, for only so could the changed quality become anchored as a fixed character of the race.
....a dictator should ever aspire to bring about some really permanent change in humanity, he could do it if, and only if, he knew how to alter some of the human genes, for only so could the changed quality become anchored as a fixed character of the race.
1956-article in the Rockefeller-financed Eugenics Review, “The very word eugenics is in disrepute in some quarters…. We must ask ourselves, what have we done wrong? We have all but killed the eugenic movement.
....people for some reason refused to accept that they were “second rate”
1957-Dr. William Sargent of the Tavistock Institute in
his book Battle for the Mind -A Physiology of Conversion and Brain-Washing,
his book Battle for the Mind -A Physiology of Conversion and Brain-Washing,
“Various types of beliefs can be implanted in many people after brain function has been sufficiently disturbed by accidentally or deliberately induced fear, anger, or excitement.
Of the results caused by such disturbances, the most common one is temporarily impaired judgment and heightened suggestibility. Its group manifestations are sometimes classed under the heading of 'herd instinct,' and appear most spectacularly in wartime, during severe epidemics
and in all similar periods of common danger, which increase anxiety and so individual and mass suggestibility."
1961-In a lecture to the California Medical School, in San Francisco, Huxley explained: There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears,
so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it,
because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.
1963- Eric Trist, the chairman of Tavistock's governing council, was perfecting a theory of brainwashing on a societal scale, Known as "social turbulence,"
.
.
He stated that a series of sharp and universal, cathartic shocks would destabilize a targetted population, plunging a whole society into a form of managed psychosis
If the shocks were repeated over a period of years, there would be a shift in mental capacity to a more infantile form. Trist boldly "predicted" in late 1963 that society had entered into a period of permanent social turbulence, which would usher society into a new paradigm.
1970 Brzezinski’s book, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era. It was this book that led him to Rockefeller and other elitists behind the Green Movement that was promoted by the Club of Rome
“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled and directed society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how.
Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control.”
1973-Salk, published Survival of the Wisest
It becomes necessary to understand those metabiological considerations that are important for continued improvement for the quality of life. The suppression of the development and expression of BEING leads to its deterioration,
It becomes necessary to understand those metabiological considerations that are important for continued improvement for the quality of life. The suppression of the development and expression of BEING leads to its deterioration,
..followed by the disintegration and destruction of the individual as a fully functioning unit. Under such circumstances, mass disaster would be expected to ensue, out of which might arise a new variety of Man...Such individuals might prove to have possessed the wisdom to survive
1975, Sen. Frank Church, the chairman of the Senate panel probing U.S. Intelligence agencies says the government has the technological capacity to impose “total tyranny” if a dictator ever came to power.
There would be no place to hide and there would be no way to fight back because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within reach of the government to know, such is the capability of this technology
1975-Project Democracy would originate out of a Trilateral Commission meeting on May 31st, in Kyoto Japan, where the Trilateral Commission’s “Task Force on the Governability of Democracies” findings were delivered.
The report says that in the United States the problems of governance "stem from an excess of democracy which needs to be moderated by reasserting undemocratic authority and cultivation of political apathy and by instigating a “controlled disintegration of society.”
1975 -CFR launched a public study of global policy titled 1980’s Project. The general theme was “controlled disintegration” of the world economy, and the report did not attempt to hide the famine, social chaos, and death its policy would bring upon most of the world’s population
1975, In Futures We Are In, a book published Fred Emery, the three stages of societal disintegration of Trist's paradigm shift are laid out.
The first stage is called superficiality, in which people start to break the bonds with the societal values of the past, the values of Judeo-Christian civilization. Superficiality results in the collapse of moral judgment, says Emery.
The next, lower stage of societal disintegration is called segmentation, in which the larger institutions of society start to disintegrate, and the focus moves from the nation-state to the local community,
then to retreat into small and increasingly more paranoid groups, whose interests are pitted against each other.
Then disassociation. The individual becomes the societal unit, withdrawing from society into a "world in which fantasy and reality are indistinguishable," and in which the difference between fantasy and reality hardly matters.
Man is reduced to a worldview dominated by "fantasy and superstition," in which he trusts no one.Emery uses the term "Clockwork Orange," as a descriptive metaphor for this type of society gone completely insane
1978 Nov 9th, Trilateral Commission member Paul Volcker (Federal Reserve Chairman from 1979-1987) would affirm at a lecture delivered at Warwick University in England:
“A controlled disintegration in the world economy is a legitimate object for the 1980s.” This is also the ideology that has shaped Milton Friedman’s “Shock Therapy”.
1978-the Ad Hoc Committee published a book Anticipatory Democracy-People in the Politics o/the Future
Toffler wrote the introduction to the book,and gave a round-about definition of anticipatory democracy (AD)
Toffler wrote the introduction to the book,and gave a round-about definition of anticipatory democracy (AD)
"My own espousal of AD sprang from the recognition that our political institutions and processes,the mechanics of representative government,are expressions not of some undying mystical human commitment to freedom but of the spread of industrial civilization ..”
This industrial civilization took the idea of representation and merchandised it around the planet as the latest, most efficient, most humane form of government imaginable.As the industrial way of life spread,representative government spread....”
This era is now screeching to a halt. Industrial civiliza tion is now in a state of terminal crisis, and a new, radically different civilization is emerging to take its place on the world stage.. . .
We are swiftly entering a new, more sophisticated state of evolutionary development based on far more ad vanced yet more appropriate technologies than any known so far.
Thus it must generate wholly new political structures and processes. I fail to see how it is possible for us to have a technological revolution,a social revolution,an information revolution,moral,sexual,and epistemological revolutions, and not a political revolution as well. . .
In this sense the breakdown of government as we have known it-which is to say representative government . . . -is chiefly a consequence of obsolescence. ...political technology no longer appropriate for the new civilization taking form around us. Our politics are obsolete."
Toffler in essence was calling for the elimination of the nation state and the creation of one-world supranational agencies to regulate the world economy, control global resources,and control the workforce.
1979-Robert McNamara, who became president of the World Bank, and ran the Vietnam War, stated: There are only two possible ways in which a world of 10 billion people can be averted.
Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly. Or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way. There are, of course, many ways in which the death rates can go up.
1981 Bilderberger Jacques Attali interview on his 1979 book-Cannibalism and Civilization: Life and Death in the History of Medicine. Its in French and excerpts translated.
In the first phase, the <health care> system tries to last by monitoring its financial costs. But this will leads to the need to monitor behaviours and thus to define standards of health, of activities, to which the individual must submit.
From then on, we move on to the second phase of self-denunciation of evil through the tools of self-control of behaviour. This allows the individual to conform to the standard of life profile and become independent of his illness.
The third phase is the appearance of prostheses that allow the name of evil in an industrial way. Thus, for example, electronique drugs such as the pill coupled with a microcomputer to release substances, elements of regulation, into the body at regular intervals.
The great dominant social science will be the science of codes, computer science and then genetics......all the medicines of the future that are linked to the control of behaviour can have a major political impact,
It would indeed be possible to reconcile parliamentary democracy with totalitarianism since it would suffice to maintain all the formal rules of parliamentary democracy but at the same time to generalize the use of these products so that totalitarianism is daily
/I don't believe in Orwellism, because it's a form of technical totalitarianism with a visible, centralized "Big Brother." Rather, I believe in implicit totalitarianism with an invisible and decentralized "Big Brother".
These machines to monitor our health, which we could have for our own good, will enslave us for our own good. In a way we will undergo a gentle and permanent conditioning...
.....with genetic engineering one could gradually ....create the conditions for a new commodity, genetic this time, which would be made of copies of men sold to men, chimeras or hybrids used as slaves, robots, means of work...
I believe that in the very logic of the industrial system in which we find ourselves, the lengthening of the lifespan is no longer a desired objective ....as soon as one exceeds 60/65 years, man lives longer than he produces and it costs society dearly.
Medicine is indicative of the evolution of a society that is moving towards decentralized totalitarianism tomorrow. There is already a sense of conscious or unconscious desire to conform as much as possible to social norms.
production of men is not yet a market like any other. Following the logic of my general reasoning, it is not clear why procreation would not become an economic production like any other.
This will allow you to buy children like you buy peanuts or a television set. A second important reason and related to the first could explain this new family order. If the child is an economic commodity like any other, society regards it also as well but for social reasons.
Democracy has a duty to adapt to technological change. Old constitutions confronted with new technologies can lead to totalitarian systems.
I believe we are emerging from an energy-controlled universe to enter the information universe. If matter is energy, life is information.
That is why the major producer of tomorrow's society will be living matter. Thanks in particular to genetic engineering, it will produce new therapeutic weapons, food and energy.
The emergence on the market of individualized self-monitoring and self-monitoring items will create the preventive spirit. Men will adapt to conform to the criteria of normality...
I believe that this world in preparation will be so awful that it means the death of man.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
