@AnonCandle @mr_plrm @mythinkspot en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reprogram…

Transgenerational epigenetic effects are going to be limited to a few sites that avoid demethylation. Histone rotation, as far as I can tell, is completely reset by meiosis itself. I can't conceive how that would be sustained through that.
@AnonCandle @mr_plrm @mythinkspot Now those sites do exist, and there's no shortage of shitlib academics who will copiously document every loci that avoids the germline reset, but perhaps this is why they never give their findings an estimated effect size on an operationalized trait.
@AnonCandle @mr_plrm @mythinkspot Like, this epigenetics stuff sorta just floats around as an academic hobby horse used to "debunk racists" and give pseudos some brain candy. But it never reaches policy because it doesn't have any impact. I generally throw wet blankets on environmental interventions, but...
@AnonCandle @mr_plrm @mythinkspot things like the abecedarian and perry preschool project showed at least SOMETHING, even if those IQ gains went away shortly after the interventions ended, the academic gains persisted and the kids put in it ended up less criminal. So it had an effect, just not on IQ.
@AnonCandle @mr_plrm @mythinkspot In that sense, ye old timey environmental nostrums had some impact. And I think you just haven't experience this. There was a time when equalizing income was the answer, when the IQ tests were biased, when "bad schools" were the problem. But they've gotten more exotic as those
@AnonCandle @mr_plrm @mythinkspot explanations failed. Of course this is never relayed to the public, so the public "debate" is just fucking retarded. Then you got into the "stereotype threat" era in the 1990s, and that ended up falling flat after the publication bias fiasco and later failed replications.
@AnonCandle @mr_plrm @mythinkspot Then around 2011 you started seeing epigenetics. It's crazy, they're actually starting to look at the genome itself to say race differences in traits aren't a function of genetic differences.

Here's the basic problem for epigenetic effects: something like ~95% of it gets erased
@AnonCandle @mr_plrm @mythinkspot ... in the germline. And "intelligence", like height, is a complex trait. GWASes have shown it's almost totally polygenic. Which means there's not going to be some little section of the genome where all the "intelligence" is that doesn't get reset in the germline.
@AnonCandle @mr_plrm @mythinkspot And on top of that, the two big environmental factors that have shown in animals to have some intergenerational inheritance - stress and nutrition - either whites do worse on (stress) or it's unclear if the way in which modern nutrition is poor has bad epigenetic effects.
@AnonCandle @mr_plrm @mythinkspot So for the race gaps, first you have to show the way in which poor black nutrition doesn't just cause obesity, but has negative epigenetic effects, and then that these effects are more powerful than the greater stress (as in, stress hormones) whites have.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with FREESOIL 🇮🇱

FREESOIL 🇮🇱 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Freesoilyeah

28 May
I hear people who were saying "China has X or Y problem", and my thought is it doesn't matter because China has a sovereign acting national government, the US doesn't.

Meaning that if there's some problem, the Chinese government, being an oligarchy, can respond quickly to
problems. What seemed obvious to me is the purpose of the state is as "the sword and hammer of the nation". Where the disparate resources can be concentrated at focal points.

If the state makes an error, like, I dunno, building a giant city that nobody moved to, they can recover
Because the oligarchy can look at it, realize it was a mistake, and then do whatever needs to be done to deal with that mistake. In the US, being a democracy, say they make a similar problem (obviously scaled down for the smaller population) - okay, what is the mechanism to...
Read 11 tweets
28 May
@rodinrodin7 Okay, that's actually a really good point. The potato had about double the calories per acre-year of just about any grain, and Europe got them before the rest of Eurasia.

But regarding your point of hidebound regimes outside Europe - I think that's an attempt to explain a...
@rodinrodin7 ... genetic change in NW Europe that radiated later and less profoundly from the North Sea area - in conventional, non-genetic terms.

Keep in mind, 99% of "historians" believe a kind of radical genetic equality of man and explain everything through circumstance and institutions.
@rodinrodin7 Now this can actually work *fairly* well, because institutions are often related to the genetic characteristics of the population. I.e. institutions spring from the genetics. So by ONLY looking at institutions, you're implicitly capturing some effects of genetics.
Read 4 tweets
27 May
@Hasmanean @GFrancis420 I mean I get how you're theorizing - basically "more complex system, more can go wrong" , and in a sense that FEELS truish to me. After all it SEEMS that humans are more likely to get depression and schizophrenia than other animals. But maybe we just don't know.
@Hasmanean @GFrancis420 That said, what would we look at? I can certainly see this in the sense of "that idea is so stupid only a professor could believe it" and how US academia was something like 40% explicit Marxist in 1980 before the USSR exploded.
@Hasmanean @GFrancis420 I just came to a hypothesis: bigger neuron-brains are more likely to cook up their own falsehoods, while smol neuron-brains are more likely to be tricked (all else being equal). But there's also a pliableness in people (brains) unrelated to neuron count, and that's seen in the...
Read 13 tweets
26 May
@Hasmanean @GFrancis420 Sure everyone knows whales have huge brains and more neurons. Whales can also navigate across oceans by dead-reckoning. Similarly, Arctic peoples, who have the largest brains of any classical race, have navigated a rather featureless area by dead reckoning.
@Hasmanean @GFrancis420 Also, whales are considered some of the "smartest" creatures on the planet. The relation is generally true.

But when comparing two random species, we would expect those with bigger brains to be "smarter". Again, birds and apes are the chief outliers.
@Hasmanean @GFrancis420 If you're looking within a species, you'd expect the relationship to be even stronger since the brains would be expected to be of similar "design" for a given size. We don't expect radical differences in "structure" between Euros and Africans when compared to interspecies diffs
Read 6 tweets
21 May
I had an epiphany that needs to be better generally known.

It started with a few "strange facts", and there are two sides to it.

The first is that blacks were taller than free whites during slavery. This is important. Very important, as it's a reflection of nutrition, which...
... in pre-industrial times is used as an indicator of general wealth before modern or modern-ish econometrics existed.

And black life expectancy relative to whites after age 8 was better than it is today. That's complicated because it's lower if you count years before age 8.
Blacks have a higher infant mortality rate than whites TODAY, but, that doesn't impact life expectancy as it used to. The literacy of blacks in the US was around 20% by emancipation, vs. ~40% for southern whites.
Read 19 tweets
21 May
@tabularasathe The insularity does two things:

1. Produces idiosynchratic differences that are a result of chance

2. Amplifies genetic differences. For example, behavior differences between Celtic peoples and Anglos.
@tabularasathe Well, as much as "chance" is really even a thing. But I assume you get my meaning.

But no, I don't think all intra-European differences in behavior (which are overstated) are down to circumstance. But my focus is more on IQ, which is a more heavily studied and heritable thing...
@tabularasathe ... than most studied psychological traits. And, practically speaking, also less malleable because heritability kinda means immutability in practice. It tells us to what extent it has been "mallea'd" thus far.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(