The Golden Ass is a fun read filled with sex, drugs, magic, violence, and lots of (often sexist) comedy
Lucius is a young man interested in women and magic
He falls for a woman enslaved to a witch. They eat magic herbs, make love, and he is accidentally turned into a donkey
/2
They thought the spell would turn him into a bird. Too bad, Lucius, you're an ass! Like the braying kind...
The only cure is to eat some fresh roses
So, Photis, his lover puts him in the stable for the night. The plan is for her to go find some roses the next morning
/3
But... there's a plot twist
yes, even really early novels had crazy plot twists
That night, the house is robbed. The robbers grab all kinds of loot and load it up on Lucius the donkey to make their get-away
/4
The adventure now begins
Lucius gets to experience life as a donkey
He's abused, insulted, and othered. Sometimes in comic fashion other times in appalling fashion
/5
At first glance, maybe its a message about animal rights
Lucius is beaten like an ass. Repeatedly
He moves from job to job, bearing one load after another on his equine back, pulling a millstone round and round to grind grain in a Roman mill (like this one from Pompeii)
/6
But the fact is that Lucius' humanity is front & center
Like his centaur cousins, he also partakes in (usually sexual) hijinks that are oh-so human
After all, there's a human in that equine form. People started to recognize it and his fame grew
/7
PS: spoiler/bestiality ahead
By the final climax of the novel he is the donkey performing sex shows. A noblewoman pays an extravagant sum to sleep with him
His humanity emerges and he runs away to fall asleep on the beach
/8
He sleeps and wakes
His visions show him the Egyptian goddess, Isis. Her procession arrives and the priest gives him his crown of roses to eat
Lucius is now a man again, initiated into an important religion of the time
The story is one of religious salvation
/9
And, this is the problem with applying our anachronistic idea of "animal rights" to this story
The story is overtly one of humanity
As a donkey, he's ignored, and so he sees humans acting like they do when nobody's watching
/10
Lucius observes lovers cheating on one another (it's a running gag)
He witnesses the unrepentant greed of so many thieves and con artists
He sees so much violent abuse, some leveled on him, some leveled on his enslaved human companions
/11
But the whole point is he's human!
In the end, he learns from his adventure. He has a religious experience and is saved
It's not a story about animal rights, it's a metaphor about humans (I know, it's shocking, early novels had metaphors, just like our modern ones)
/12
The fact that
@PeterSinger
published in
@AntigoneJournal
that The Golden Ass is about animal rights is a problem
Peter Singer has argued that it should be ethical and legal to kill disabled children with serious illnesses, after birth
/13 aeon.co/ideas/what-i-l…
The philosophical argument to kill children is one that is based in dehumanization
According to this argument, a serious disability can make someone less than human so that normal human ethics don't apply
/14
Confusing Apuleius' Golden Ass as a story about animals instead of humans betrays a similar, biased logic
Singer admits in his piece, he'd never even heard of this novel a few years ago. And, then, bam he reads it as a story about animal rights and not human salvation...
/15
As a scholar who studies ancient animals, I can tell you that not too many donkeys had torrid affairs with noblewomen
Enslaved humans were abused and dragged millstones round and round in ancient Rome. Nothing in this novel should be read as about animals, but humans
/16
How we read and explain a story matters
Disabled people are and were people
Who @AntigoneJournal chooses to publish matters
They claim to make Classics accessible for all. But this article is inaccurate and excludes disabled people
/end
Plus, it just seems ironic to be so vociferous for animal rights and so casual about eliminating human rights from real people. After all, killing someone is certainly eliminating their human rights
This whole situation upsets and confuses me
BREAKING NEWS
George Orwell's Animal Farm is actually about animal rights!
C'mon @AntigoneJournal, this article is basically making the same argument!
Thanks to the reminder of @debscavator, I've now re-written the thread to include alt-text
which is only fitting since one of the themes of the thread is disability, and I want my threads to be accessible to all
Another good point by @CBPolt
Lucius is shunned by fellow animals. His mistreatment is a metaphor for the mistreatment of people
Exactly what Singer's philosophy misses. He argues to treat animals well but to kill people
A short reply: the proof that my debate tanked Graham Hancock's support in his fandom is everywhere
No rational people think his ideas are plausible after seeing us
So the only response he had was to make it seem I lied. A ridiculous and cheap ploy
/1
The claim I lied is ridiculous for several reasons
First, not a single professional archaeologist agrees with him. We disagree for many reasons because the archaeological evidence against an advanced Ice Age civilization exists everywhere in all the archaeology we do have
/2
Second, Hancock's claims that I lied have nothing to do with the two core disproofs that I focused my time presenting to Joe Rogan
The evidence for Ice Age hunter-gatherers on coasts, underwater, and in deserts
The evidence for the development of agriculture around the world
/3
OK, I've now seen this video. I will reply in this thread to the defamatory accusation here, made both by @Graham__Hancock and @dedunkingpast, that I somehow "conned" Graham Hancock and @JoeRogan
/1
First off, Graham Hancock has written several books, hosted a Netflix series, and given 100s of talks on the topic of a global civilization from the Ice Age with advanced technology
If I conned him using published evidence, then he's admitting he doesn't know much about it
/2
Which is true. He admitted directly to Joe Rogan that there is "no evidence" for his proposed civilization
I am annoyed with the editors of Archaeological Prospection and the media and how it handles this Gunung Padang controversy
Nobody has gone and talked with local Indonesian archaeologists. None provide the correct date of the monument nor even stated it's not a pyramid
/1
Misinformation and disinformation is successful because it fills up the internet with wrong information and overwhelms correct information
This retraction by the editors at Archaeological Prospection is not enough
Local archaeologists know about the site. They've excavated it
To learn more about the site, I reached out to Dr. Lutfi Yondri and @harrysofian
Why?
Because I couldn't trust what was on the internet. Wikipedia provides some wide range of dates. No article, blog, podcast, or youtube video provided an accurate date
I recently learned the teaching of ancient languages at Cardiff University (@cardiffuni @CUHistArchRel) is under threat: Latin, Ancient Greek, Hebrew & Sanskrit
SIGN AND SHARE this petition created by ancient history and archaeology students 1/7
From its foundation 130 years ago, the teaching of languages - including Welsh, Latin, and Ancient Greek - has been a central emphasis @cardiffuni
Multilingual inscriptions around campus can be found, but future students might not be trained to read those in ancient languages
/2
The students note, 'We should be working to bring these languages outside of private education to make them accessible to everyone who wishes to learn & expand their knowledge of the ancient world'
His rhetoric sows distrust in experts, and #Atlantis conspiracy theories promote white supremacy
Buckle up, it’s time for an #ARCHAEOLOGY THREAD 🧵
/1
This thread will examine
1)Hancock's lack of evidence
2)How Hancock’s narrative recycles 19th century ideas on #Atlantis
3)The rhetorical tools Hancock and similar conspiracy theories use
/2
Why trust me?
No idea. I’m just a dude who won’t pay for a checkmark
But I am a real archaeologist. I’ve excavated at sites spanning tens of thousands of years of human history & prehistory
Trust my credentials or don’t. But I’ll present real evidence why this show is crap
/3