Apparently Michael Flynn’s derangment is tempered by cowardice: He’s now attempting to retcon his endorsement of a military coup at a QAnon event & pretend he said the opposite of what he is caught on video saying. texasnewstoday.com/michael-flynn-…
He’s now claiming he said “there’s no reason [a coup like in Myanmar] should happen here. Horseshit. Watch the video. Even if hadn’t already previously called for martial law to overturn the election, it’s not ambiguous. At all.
Question: “I wanna know why what happened in Minnamar [sic] can’t happen here?” [HUGE cheers from crowd]

Flynn: “No reason. I mean, it should happen here.” [more cheers from crowd] “No reason. That’s right. One more!”
“One more” there is, fwiw, “one more question” not “one more coup.” But “no reason” is obviously answering “why can’t it happen here?” Instead of apologizing for this vile reply, Flynn adds words he didn’t say to his answer, then blames the media for reporting what he did say.
It would be very marginally less contemptible if he at least owned up to giving the crowd the fascist red meat they so clearly wanted. But he wants to cling whatever last shred of mainstream respectability he imagines he enjoys & also take the applause & cash from QAnon.
Say what you will about the tenets of Soviet Communism, but Kim Philby at least believed in the cause he betrayed his country for. Flynn lacks even the courage of his quisling convictions.
Confident Flynn cooked up this lie only after realizing he’d crossed a line that might imperil his future Fox bookings & CPAC speaker fees. Doubt he’s fooling anyone, but they’ll love the media bias schtick, & if you don’t show the video, implausible deniability is good enough.
Aside from the comically desperate lie about his own videotaped remarks, Flynn calls it “a conference of patriotic Americans who love this country, as I do”? They were CHEERING the idea of a brutal military coup that murders civilians being replicated in the United States.
If he cared about selling the lie, he’d at least go through the motions of feigning horror at the bloodthirsty crowd. But he doesn’t want to jeopardize the money & attention from the cranks. It’s juuust enough of a feeble pro-forma denial to keep him booked on Fox.
Of course, last time he brazenly lied about remarks he made that were caught on tape, he not only ultimately got away with it but earned himself celebrity martyr status in the process, so little wonder he thinks he can pull it off when it’s not even FBI asking.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Julian Sanchez

Julian Sanchez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @normative

25 May
If you could actually do this, it would entail wiping out ~$250 billion in assets, much of that held by people who engaged in lawful transactions. It’s not really clear how you could in fact do it, though.
All the major ransomware groups & most bitcoin exchanges are outside U.S. jurisdiction. So in practice you’re just making it illegal for U.S. victims to pay ransoms. Which… we could just do directly, if we wanted to do that.
There are also thorny definitional issues. Is any digital asset tracked via blockchain a “cryptocurrency”? If so, you’re banning NFTs too. If not, ransomware groups ask for payment in the form of some digital asset that falls outside the definition of “cryptocurrency.”
Read 4 tweets
21 May
As an undergrad, I’d started expecting to major in journalism. The profs I became really friendly with advised me not to: “Take a few classes, maybe do a minor, but you’re better off learning a subject relevant to what you report on. Journalism itself you learn by doing it.”
What IS vital, and related to our “info problems,” is the transmission of journalistic norms & practice & culture, which traditionally happened via working with more experienced veteran reporters & editors, whether or not you’d gone through a college journalism curriculum.
The Internet has enabled a lot of people to bypass the traditional process of slogging your way up the journalistic totem poll, as it were. As a 20-something blogger in the early aughts, this was fantastic: You could build a sizable national audience out of nowhere.
Read 11 tweets
19 May
I mean, in practice this is often in fact true, but that’s mostly the fault of those same members of Congress.
As both a former journalist an an advocate for transparency I hate saying this, but I often wonder if hearings would be more productive if they were not on camera.
Hearings are often a waste of time because most members seem to view them as opportunities to give self-righteous speeches they hope will get them on teevee, rather than a process for gathering information from experts and public officials.
Read 4 tweets
19 May
That the word “insurance” does not appear in this article is at least minor journalistic malpractice. wsj.com/articles/colon…
As ProPublica documented in 2019, insurers routinely nudge companies to pay ransoms, because the ransom demand is usually calibrated to be cheaper than mitigation. propublica.org/article/the-ex…
That might be a defensible choice for the company in some cases, but it seems like necessary context if you’re going to run the CEO’s “for the good of the country” line.
Read 4 tweets
18 May
If you haven’t looked at the whole document, the (majority Republican) Maricopa County Board of Supervisors letter on the AZ Senate “audit” is just absolutely blistering. maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter…
“[T]he Arizona Senate is not acting in good faith, has no intention of learning anything about the November 2020 General Election, but is only interested in feeding the various festering conspiracy theories that fuel the fundraising schemes of those pulling your strings."
"You have rented out the once good name of the Arizona State Senate to grifters and con-artists, who are fundraising hard-earned money from our fellow citizens…"
Read 5 tweets
17 May
Wow. Unless there’s an extraordinarily clear threat justifying an investigation, this is outrageous. Bad enough Nunes abuses the civil courts to mount frivolous lawsuits against online critics—now it seems he had DOJ doing his dirty work as well.
There really need to be hearings about this, and if it is indeed what it looks like, heads should roll at DOJ.
It also seems telling that DOJ was unwilling to show Twitter the supposed threatening communication, which presumably would have induced them to comply if it were real.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(