Remember this every time Shapps/Boris make a BIG SIGHING NOISE about funding TfL in the pandemic:
1) The gov DEMANDED TfL be funded by fare revenue. Boris agreed as Mayor 2) The gov DEMANDED full service patterns rn 3) They've given MORE cash to regional rail with no conditions.
So if you're outside London, thinking "well this is just bloody London getting more money than the rest of us yet again."
Remember that THIS IS THE NARRATIVE THEY ARE DELIBERATELY PUSHING ON YOU.
You know how they're fucking the northern cities? They're doing it to London, too.
And that's the ENTIRE reason they push this narrative
Because they want you to think of us as "them." Their absolute worst case nightmare is people in Manchester, or Blackburn or in any of the other cities they're fucking realising that London isn't your enemy. We're your ally.
That we're not sitting down here in massive houses, supping lattes and stealing your hard earned money from the treasury whilst also working as bankers at Canary Wharf.
We are NOT a "metropolitan elite" that's an utterly made up thing. We are just like you.
That's OUR taxes AND yours they're giving to their old school buddies who suddenly decided to make PPE.
It's LONDONERS suffering, like those outside of London, in some of the worst poverty and housing in the country.
Grenfell happened here. And still NOTHING has been fixed.
It's OUR devolved government that they're desperately trying to handicap politically and economically because we don't think the shitty nationalist, true blue way they mistakenly think is "Britain"
Just as they're doing it in Scotland, and in every Local Authority up north.
Next time you see a headline about "bailouts" for TfL, or a comment (subtle or otherwise) about 'Metropolitan Elites' or how 'the country shouldn't support London' remember this is DELIBERATE.
Remember that we are YOU. Not a THEM.
They're a THEM. And they're coming for us all.
Because transport and infrastructure isn't a zero-sum game. It's not either/or. The entire fucking POINT of good transport investment is that it pays for itself eventually through economic, environmental and social uplift.
You can fund BOTH improvements in London AND up north.
The simple, blunt truth is that this government - like god knows how many now before it - don't fucking want to.
And they've fucking HATED the fact that London, because it DOES have enough scale and clout to do it's own shit has highlighted what SHOULD be happening everywhere.
THAT'S why they're killing TfL's independence, and crippling this city's future ability to do transformational transport.
Not because they want to lift the regions up instead. But because they want it to stop being obvious that the regions NEED and SHOULD be lifted up AS WELL.
This is NOT a government dedicated to levelling up. It's a government dedicated to taking more out.
And if you think I'm wrong on that, go ask where that £250m a week for the NHS has gone. Or ask fishing communities right now how the promised post-EU life is looking. Or farmers.
So maybe, when they super-pinky swear promise that the main reason they keep kicking London is because they are TOTALLY SUPER COMMITTED to funding shit elsewhere...
Well, maybe let's judge the chances of that based on what they've DONE with previous promises, yeah?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BTW, if you're wondering what the real price attached to this current TfL settlement by the government is, then a big part of it is killing off TfL/SK's efforts to increase the social housing stock in London.
That's how vindictive this government is.
TfL Business Plans are, essentially, one of the few real things over which the Mayor of London has near-absolute control.
i.e where he gets to set policy as he likes AND wield TfL's significant budget, fund raising and market pressure to facilitate meaningful change.
Both this settlement and the one before it are really about clipping that power and forcing the DfT (for which read 'Cabinet Minister') into the TfL planning and budgeting process.
Not a silly question, but one that isn't necessarily immediately obvious.
Firstly, because the doors are in different places. That brings all sorts of problems - because where do you put the PEDs, and how do you get them to open in a way that doesn't interfere with boarding? /1
Secondly, because your carriages will be designed differently and because some of them will be designed for use WITH PEDs and others not.
Is the gap between door and platform too wide? Can you retrofit the sensors necessary to line doors up?
Thirdly, passengers move through trains and platforms differently on busy stations with PEDs. Pop down the Canary Wharf Jubbly platforms to see this in action.
People queue!
But how do you handle/help them navigate when it's not obvious which PEDs will open or not?
There are a LOT of people discovering right now that English Catholicism has a habit of quietly ignoring the crappy bits of the rules when nobody is watching.
Not as much as it should, because it depends on how decent the priest is, but more than most realise.
Having the medieval version of Boris Johnson do a Brexit on your churches tends to leave you somewhat pragmatic about how you practice your faith.
Bluntly: I've been in Anglican churches that are more "Catholic" than most Catholic masses I've been in, in England, during my life.
As a kid, most of the chats I had with my local priest were when he was out in the car park fixing his motorbike and we cycled past to the park.
Okay. Let's talk incumbency and why Johnson isn't cursed with.
For a new PM of an existing government party to be seen as an incumbent government, they have to represent some kind of continuation of the ideas and policies of the previous PM.
One of my friends has just admitted to me that he had to get his cat its own prayer mat to avoid issues during Ramadan, which I absolutely love and is the most cat thing ever.
Now I am googling "cats on prayer mats" and am amaze.
This is 100% one of those things thats like:
"Oh wait. Of COURSE this would be an issue"
Once you stop and think about it for even a second.
Everyone forgets that there was a DEEPLY shit TV series remake of Passport to Pimlico in the 90s, which focused on how funny it would be if one shit little town in England decided it didn't want to be in the UKEU etc.