Today, Health Sec @HumzaYousaf said 10 children age 0-9 were in hospital last week "because of Covid". A serious claim. We asked Scot Gov for
- The basis of the figures
- If any are seriously ill
- If Mr Yousaf was definitely correct

They came back with this, 7 hours later:
The Health Sec also claimed if parents from a Level 2 area took kids to a soft play in a Level 1 area (where soft plays can open) it "could lead to hospitalisation of children".

Here's what Scot Gov said when asked about the lawfulness of such a scenario. (In short, it's legal)
The Scot Gov statement about 10 child Covid patients does *not* say Humza Yousaf was incorrect in any way when he said on @BBCRadioScot that "hospital figures for last week" showed "there was 10 young children - 0-9 years old - who were hospitalised because of Covid"
If Humza Yousaf was wrong in any way (eg, perhaps it wasn't correct to "because of"), Scot Gov would have a duty to clear this up.

The alternative is that the civil servants/special advisers are covering for him, at the expense of public understanding of the pandemic
But if Humza Yousaf was correct in what he said - 10 children age 0-9 in Scotland's hospitals *because of* Covid (based on unpublished data), coupled with his warning that children mixing at soft plays could lead to hospitalisations - then surely that merits further explanation?
Maybe @DrGregorSmith or @jasonleitch as public health officials will shed some more light on this. Were 10 children age 0-9 being treated in hospital last week because of Covid? Is this an unusually high number? Should parents be worried about soft plays causing hospitalisations?
Last week's data (new today) shows 14 "admissions" age 0-14. "Admission" does not necessarily mean admitted due to Covid. It can mean people in hosp already who caught Covid, or asymptomatics in for other treatment who test +ve when screened on admission
John Swinney asked by @BBCGaryR re Humza Yousaf comments that 10 kids age 0-9 are in hospital because of Covid. Swinney does not confirm/deny figs but says gov needs to determine if new strains are "making it more acutely challenging for children, with a greater health impact"
Update: At media briefing with FM's spokespeople this afternoon, journalists asked if Humza Yousaf was accurate in saying 10 children were in hospital "because of Covid"(as direct result, rather than testing positive on screening). They did not give clear answers. Quotes follow:
FM spokesman: "I don't have the individual patient data to hand... but that type of analysis and monitoring is the kind of work that (we) are talking about , it;s to try and make sure the public health officials are across all the relevant data."
FM spokesman: "In terms of what you specifically say about whether children who may have been in hospital because of Covid, or if they were admitted for something else but also happen to test positive, all that work is I'm sure under way by public health colleagues."
Asked why Humza Yousaf said 10 kids age 0-9 were in hospital "because of Covid", when government spokespeople are now suggesting they don't know for sure, FM's spokeswoman said the figures stated by Mr Yousaf were "correct" and promised a further update via Scot Gov press office
FM's spokesman was also asked if parents should be concerned following John Swinney and Humza Yousaf's comments. He said: "I don't think there's any undue cause for concern over that aspect but it's something that has to be kept an eye on."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris Musson

Chris Musson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChrisMusson

2 Jun
Age breakdowns for Covid hospitalisations not published, but totals are. We don't know what day @HumzaYousaf was referring to here but avg of 92 people in hospital last week (Sun-Sat) with recently confirmed Covid-19.

So, his comments suggest approx 10% were in 0-9 age bracket
Mr Yousaf's comments that children 0-9 in hospital "because of Covid" also suggest the children in are hospital *because* of Covid - not just after testing positive for Covid while in hospital primarily for something else. Have asked Scot Gov for clarification
Numbers of patients currently in hospital (broken down by age) are not published. Since start of pandemic, Public Health Scotland data shows 238 admissions in 0-4 age group, 139 in 5-14. Will include cases of children with Covid but being treated for primarily other illnesses).
Read 4 tweets
1 Mar
We report today on a senior Scot Gov public health official using an arguably misleading & inaccurate deaths stat in Friday's Scot Gov televised Covid briefing, in order for the gov to back up its controversial argument it nearly eliminated Covid in summer thescottishsun.co.uk/news/scottish-…
In short, national clinical director Prof Jason Leitch suggested there were no Covid-related deaths between July 17 & Aug 18. There were in fact 24

Even if you examine his claim with a caveat he gave in response to one of two Qs on the issue, there was 1.

More detail follows
Prof Jason Leitch was responding to Edinburgh Uni epidemiologist Prof Mark Woolhouse's claims on Thurs that Scotland did not get close to elimination. Woolhouse's comments were widely reported, eg: thescottishsun.co.uk/news/6737272/c…
Read 15 tweets
26 Feb
Scotland's national clinical director @jasonleitch said at Covid briefing today that he disagreed with Edinburgh University epidemiologist Professor Mark Woolhouse, who cast doubt yesterday on Scot Gov claims that Scotland nearly eliminated the virus last summer
.@jasonleitch: “I disagree with Mark - you may not be surprised to hear that - but that’s healthy. That’s a good thing in the scientific advisory community. Some of the other members of our advisory group also disagree with Mark, again - healthy, that’s good."
Prof Leitch: “We rarely play those scientific debates out live at parliamentary committees and live on TV and that’s the nature of the pandemic.”
Read 8 tweets
26 Feb
Scot Gov Health Secretary Jeane Freeman confirms she will follow JCVI recommendation for phase two of the vaccine programme - eg, downwards by age, and no priority for key workers like teachers/police
Health Sec Jeane Freeman says target to finish groups 1-9 (down to over 50s) is April 15.

Age 40-49 will follow after that, as per JCVI recommendations
Freeman: "I understand why some of our professions and sectoral groups may be disappointed with the JCVI advice but they are crystal clear about where the greatest risk factor lies, and it doesn't lie on the basis of where you work, but on age..(and) underlying health conditions"
Read 6 tweets
25 Feb
Edinburgh Uni's Prof Mark Woolhouse (Scot Gov adviser) tells Holyrood's Covid committee: “Scotland was not close to elimination at any stage during this epidemic.”

Other experts (eg Prof Devi Sridhar) and Nicola Sturgeon have said that Scotland was close to elimination in summer
Prof Woolhouse, chair of infectious disease epidemiology at Edinburgh University, says there were low numbers of "reported" cases during the summer in Scotland, but modelling using a method that has been “very well validated since” show elimination was not close
Prof Woolhouse casts doubt on whether an elimination strategy in Scotland (seemingly favoured by Scot Gov) could work. He says there is "no route" for Scotland to get to where New Zealand (which has adopted a successful elimination strategy) is now
Read 11 tweets
23 Feb
The Scottish Parliament is removing Alex Salmond's evidence to its inquiry into the unlawful gov investigation into him, after concerns were raised by Scotland's prosecution service, the Crown Office. It will be republished - redacted - later, the parliament says
Scot Parl: “Following representations from the Crown Office on Monday evening, the SPCB agreed collectively this morning that it will remove the Alex Salmond submission on the Ministerial Code from its website with immediate effect and republish it later today in a redacted form"
The SPCB is the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body, which is the cross-party body responsible for the administration of parliament.

You have to wonder how - given wide debate around this issue - Scot Parl managed to publish a submission that the Crown had grave concerns about
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(