Wait, okay my bad. Alec here said "bike lanes" but the story isnt about that, its recreational biking on the trail. I dont care about that but on *bike lanes* e bikes are welcome and anyone complaining can get them widened or shut up.
Now whats a "recreational" trail? I dont use ebikes but i see em on city park trails or shoreline trails where i do "recreational cycling" and thats great. Unless its out in the wilderness, and even then i dont care, but especially green areas and parks in suburbs and cities
Whenever in doubt its safe to side against exclusionary cyclists who bitch about bike lanes, people not wearing helmets, ebikes ect. Fuck your midlife crisis, let people bike, electric or not.
If the cycling space is too small, grow the cycling space. Widened the bike trail. Dont push people off cycling because they use peddle assist, lol how ridiculous

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Darrell "Pass AB 1401" Owens

Darrell

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IDoTheThinking

1 Jun
"transit in LA is losing riders to a better option, not a cheaper one."
Free fares is good but if 98% of your region would rather pay premiums for years, pay insurance, pay $50 in gas weekly, tolls, parking fees over riding transit, the problem is far bigger than a $2.50 bus fare
But fares DO matter. I know people who will not ride the bus until their college passes come online. Low Income people cant opt out and just have to pay ever increasing fares for subpar service
Now whether fares ought to be made free or cheaper is a worthy debate but fare burden DOES matter and urbanist gotta stop acting like it doesn't
Read 9 tweets
1 Jun
An unsuspecting subdivided fiveplex
Just your average fourplex
Another fourplex identical to a single family home, only identifiable by the meters on the side
Read 4 tweets
31 May
Decade in Review: This is the Bay Area's Jobs-Housing Balance during the entire 2010s.

The blue bar is the number of jobs created from the late 2009/early 2010s to the end of 2019, and the orange bar is the number of homes built (i.e. not just permits) from 4/1/2010 to 1/1/2020
The reason I used the April 2009-March 2010 average as rather than just the 2010 average is because the DOF counted 2010's homes in April so it gives it an appropriate symmetry and lag. Numbers virtually identical anyhow. I've shared the DOF's nums:
The Bay Area added 6 (or 6.36) employees for every 1 home built in the entire 2010s. And we sit here and wonder why there's a housing crisis. Props to Solano and Contra Costa for being responsible. Alameda did meh assuming 2 employees per home. Everyone else was dogshit
Read 10 tweets
30 May
Stupid and cowardly country buys more guns because they're on social media all day despite the decade's murder rate being at the lowest since the 1960s. News at 11.
All these guns everyone's buying because Facebook and Twitter instantly share crime videos and opportunists are peddling fear is mostly going to be used to kill other family members accidentally or as a suicide weapon once the neglect of mental health reaches overload.
Fantasy: This new glock I have zero training with will protect me against the protesters

Reality: This new glock I have will be used against my wife as soon as I get into a vicious argument
Read 6 tweets
30 May
"Print out the directions on MapQuest and lets get going."
"Clean the CD with rubbing alcohol to stop it from skipping."
TV Show on Youtube (Part 1 of 6) 2:01, 240p ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Read 5 tweets
28 May
I hate repeating that this is a housing shortage but literally all indicators are identical. We're approaching WW2 levels of home scarcity yet we're not fighting the Axis and we have no nat'l rent control. The young can't move out their parents homes into homes that dont exist
I read the news story but used an old chart. Here's the 2020 version. We aren't approaching WW2 level housing woes, we've now surpassed it--in the number of 18-29 year olds living at home with their parents.
We have an aging population living in housing built for a post-war baby boom and then we stopped and now we're just out. The only ones who win here are speculators when everyone's competing for the few crumbs left.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(