Savarkar has three opponents.
1. Sarva dharma samabhāva type Gandhian congressis / libtards.
2. Brigade / DMK / Kshatriya-baniya-OBC-SC caste supremacists (or regional chauvinists) who only see the Brahmin caste (or Marathi linguistic ethnicity) of Savarkar to hate him.
1. Sarva dharma samabhāva type Gandhian congressis / libtards.
2. Brigade / DMK / Kshatriya-baniya-OBC-SC caste supremacists (or regional chauvinists) who only see the Brahmin caste (or Marathi linguistic ethnicity) of Savarkar to hate him.
3. The Uber-Hindu “trad” gang who get pissed due to his opinions on cow, Īshwara, caste etc.
The third category is not exactly an opponent like first two are. They are least virulent among three and their opposition is usually harmless (because they are staunch Hindus).
The third category is not exactly an opponent like first two are. They are least virulent among three and their opposition is usually harmless (because they are staunch Hindus).
At the core of all three is deep belief in supremacy of one’s caste identity.
The Congressi libtards are as extremely and virulently casteist/caste supremacist as Sambhaji Brigade / unionists / DMK types. Just they are usually cover it up brilliantly in liberal gobbledygook.
The Congressi libtards are as extremely and virulently casteist/caste supremacist as Sambhaji Brigade / unionists / DMK types. Just they are usually cover it up brilliantly in liberal gobbledygook.
The virulent notion of one’s supremacy and exceptionalism coupled with Brahmin hatred is at the core of all the spawn of Periyar and their offshoots in all castes and regions of India. Usually helped by Fox type leaders (there is a 🦊 analogue regional satrap in every province).
The opposition by the Uber-Hindu “trad gang” (many respectable people in this group who genuinely believe in applicability of birth based “guNa-karma-vibhāgashah” varNāshrama dharma is the most curious of all.
Savarkar’s stinging (and religiously irrelevant) criticism apart, ++
Savarkar’s stinging (and religiously irrelevant) criticism apart, ++
The third group is also the real conduit for propagation of Hindutva.
As long as the third group “keeps it real” and doesn’t make practical sociopolitical decisions based on their personal preferences on varNāshrama etc, they are best positioned to benefit from Savarkar.
As long as the third group “keeps it real” and doesn’t make practical sociopolitical decisions based on their personal preferences on varNāshrama etc, they are best positioned to benefit from Savarkar.
Problem is that the third group tends to loose contact with ground reality far too often and it is frustrating to every now and then remind them what a shitty situation They/Hindus are in and why is it important for them to stick together for “ihalaukika/ this worldly” affairs.
People from categories 1 and 2 won’t even mind leaving Hindu dharma if only they get to fulfil their wet dreams (Gandhian/Nehruvian Sarvadharma Samabhāva for category 1, and genocide of Brahmins & destruction of Hindu dharma for category 2). Both are natural allies to each other
It is really difficult to be a Savarkar and a Savarkaraite.
To put it it’s simply,
Savarkar’s Hindutva = Aihik (this worldly) Hindu hita vāda
A sociopolitical ideology for organisation and material upliftment of Hindus as a group
The “that worldly” opinions of Savarkar usually are irrelevant in this case except to shake the trad class
Savarkar’s Hindutva = Aihik (this worldly) Hindu hita vāda
A sociopolitical ideology for organisation and material upliftment of Hindus as a group
The “that worldly” opinions of Savarkar usually are irrelevant in this case except to shake the trad class
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
