What's been unveiled about the underbelly of the SBC is just a microcosm of what's going on in many Evangelical denominations and institutions in the U.S.

The question is, are we going to learn? Are we going to dig deeper into what's going on behind the scenes in our circles?
This is not just an SBC problem, and to frame it as such will cause even more harm. Lay people in the pews of Evangelical denominations need to ask their leadership about what's being done to make sure these same things aren't happening in their own denominational circles.
Students at Evangelical seminaries need to ask what kinds of policies are in place to prevent and deal with these kinds of heinous actions and to increase transparency between the leadership and everyone else.
The underbelly of the SBC should not make us all think the worst of those in positions of power, but it should make us be critical thinkers who are also realistic about sin within the church. We should always be alert and ready so that we can respond in ways that can immediately
help victims, counteract DARVO tactics and cover-ups, and create safe pathways for whistleblowing. This should be a great of a time as ever to take a good hard look at the policies we currently have in place in our own denominations and institutions to see if they would
please our Lord, or if they will end up making us no different than what's been revealed about the SBC.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Timothy Isaiah Cho

Timothy Isaiah Cho Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tisaiahcho

5 Jun
There are Reformed circles that act as though doctrinal orthodoxy covers over a multitude of sins. While claiming they believe in a "high view" of the ministry of the Word, they believe that an ordained minister who is ungodly and unloving is nevertheless preaching God's Word.
A low bar of ordination (i.e. passing theological examination) is seen as a license to preach and administer the sacraments regardless of whether or not the private life of the minister is in step with the gospel of Jesus Christ. As long as he "preaches the gospel," his "rough
around the edges" parts of him are explained away and excused.

I will say this with the deepest sadness - out of the Reformed ministers I have been in close proximity with in their private and family lives for extended periods of time, I can count less than the fingers on one
Read 8 tweets
5 Jun
It's shameful that in the church, those who want to pursue justice for victims have an ungodly standard placed upon them to be considered trustworthy. One slight misstep, one word said out of turn, one phrase misinterpreted is used as the lynchpin by detractors.
All the while those who are engaging in abuse are given huge leeway for their "indiscretions" and "mistakes," and second chances become fifteenth chances.

We have created and maintain a standard of a perfect victim and a perfect advocate. Instead of recognizing that ongoing
trauma in a victim's life has ongoing repercussions and expressions, we wrongfully chalk them up to be unreliable, untrustworthy, and divisive because they don't fit within the paradigm of perfection. Instead of walking with victims and caring for them as they need, we end up
Read 7 tweets
27 May
Cornelius Van Til argued that we don't deal with just bare facts, but we interpret facts based upon our presuppositions. The presuppositional preference of protecting reputation and power have again and again overridden accountability, justice, and protection.
Further, "slander" requires falsehood in order to be slander. People telling their experiences of abuse in the OPC and PCA does not amount to slander in any thoughtful definition of the term. That would be equivalent to calling a whistleblower policy a slander policy.
Even further, your comments and similar comments are exactly why people have not and continue to not come out in public with their stories of abuse in our church circles. They are met with gaslighting, preposterous accusations of "slander" and "insubordination," while the
Read 6 tweets
26 May
It's historically been a minority view to argue that "Junia" was a man (i.e. "Junias"). Ever since the Greek New Testament began using accent marks, it accented the name in such a way that it *had* to be rendered as feminine. It's only in recent history that that's been
challenged.

"Outstanding among the apostles" *can* be rendered "outstanding by the apostles." But, Matt. 2:6 has a parallel construction of en tois when it says "Bethlehem... not least among the rulers of Judah." The similar construction would lead you to exegete it similarly.
There's no exegetical necessity to translate it as "outstanding by," but there is precedent to translate as "outstanding among/within the group of the apostles."

"Apostle" can be used in a less technical sense, like for Barnabas, Timothy, and Silvanus. But, in the NT, it
Read 5 tweets
26 May
@MeditarMestizo is just citing and quoting straight up facts of the legal history of the U.S. You cannot look at all of this data and say that the U.S. was not constructed to be a White nation with White supremacy at its core.

One of the biggest takeaways I had from this was
when @MeditarMestizo encouraged Christians and churches to think about the laws that have created the communities where they find themselves today. What laws and practices intentionally excluded and disenfranchised people groups in order to create the cities and neighborhoods you
find yourself in? And, how can the church, as an embassy of grace, enter into and bring healing, justice, and correction knowing that history?

White Christians often like to think that the "lack of diversity" in their churches as something accidental or unfortunate, when the
Read 5 tweets
25 May
From my understanding (I could be wrong), I don't believe that wine and bread are intended by the Lord to be the exclusive, universal elements of the Eucharist.

Rather, I think it's clear from a biblical theological perspective that wine and bread symbolize
rejoicing/mirth and sustenance/fullness, respectively.

Churches in different parts of the world have employed this understanding when they have chosen what to use for the elements of the Eucharist, especially when wine and bread are not at all within their regular cultural
experience. They choose a drink of celebration and a food of core sustenance to remind themselves that in Christ is rejoicing and fullness, signed and sealed in a covenant meal.

I'm aware that this can bring up some odd situations, especially within the U.S.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(