You pay for the sins of every guy that fucked her up before you met her. Her father, her ex etc.
Because the trauma from her suffering typically overshadows the wisdom from her experiences.
Women do not improve with use. They deteriorate.
Deep down everybody knows this.
This is why being the first love of a woman of a good father is the best shot you'll ever have.
This is why traditionally women were married off young as virgins.
Because women are fragile, and as they accumulate experience they accumulate trauma that ruins them for romance.
The feminine is not built for stress. It is the masculine that is forged through the traumas of suffering, not the feminine. Women who actively have to work on being feminine aren't ascending to a higher stage, they're trying to get back something they had but lost to suffering.
The feminine is in its natural state, complete. The same cannot be said for the masculine. The masculine undergoes a journey which requires the integration of the shadow and the shedding and loss of innocence to truly self-actualise. Women attempting the same journey will implode
There is no man you would truly consider a man who hasn't paid a trip to hell.
Those are the fees we pay. That's the cost of being man.
A woman who went to hell is a shadow of her former self because hell destroys femininity.
Which is why it strengthens men and destroys women.
Not every man survives hell. The weak ones suicide, or become sociopathic - highly emotional, unbalanced and destructive men who lash out at everything aggressively in the same way your typical feminist woman does.
But men *CAN* make the trip and be better for it.
Women cannot.
Men do "need to get in touch with their softer side" but not until they've been to hell, survived, made peace with it and come out the other end free of resentment and bitterness, but fortified by their experiences into a man.
And its a good woman's love that brings that out.
The reason for this is simple. If you've been to hell, you became a monster to beat a monster, and if you're not careful, that monster will possess you (sociopathy). Connecting with your softer side is thus a counterbalance to the evil that lurks within you and helps centre you.
But if you have not made the trip to hell, never triggered your shadow, let alone even integrated it, and you're already "connecting with your softer side" - then you'll never survive the trip necessary to hell. You're taking steps back rather than forward. This is self-sabotage.
You could define a healthy masculine man as a man who has unlocked his inner darkness, but does not wish to be consumed by it. Such a man benefits from feminine warmth as it balances him rather than feminises him
The same cannot be said for men who haven't unlocked the darkness.
Put another way, a boy who spends a lot of time around women too much is coddled and becomes feminised, never properly developing.
But the unpossessed man who can wield evil who spends time with women who care for him will only become kinder, not weaker.
This is the difference.
If spending too much time around women feminises you, it's because you've not paid your dues and been to hell, triggered your shadow and met your darkest self.
And life has a way of making sure you pay your fees.
You can avoid the trip, but your weakness means it'll find you.
And to be honest, it needs to find you.
Because only then will you be strong enough to protect the women you care about from making that same trip.
The very trip that ruins them, and makes them all but useless to us.
Don't let your women go to hell.
Go for them, and evolve.
And by go for them, I mean go so they don't have to
You're going for yourself first and foremost.
They like you are simply the beneficiaries of your journey.
If the women in your family are making trips to hell, you've let them down.
And that's why they're not feminine. Fact.
The men who have been to hell but didn't make the trip successfully are the ones who know how to be evil but can't control it, and thus become tyrannical and abuse that power to send their women to hell rather than to protect them from it.
Never be that guy. This is failure.
She's either going to hell because you're a sociopath, or she's going to hell because you're a weakling who cannot protect her from the predatoriness of life.
Either way, you've failed - because you haven't preserved her femininity.
Femininity is fragile and easily snuffed out.
Warm eyes, a coy stare, a gentle smile, a general cheeriness, a shy giggle, modesty, grace and a pure heart - when's the last time you observed the captivating beauty of healthy femininity?
That's what's hard to cultivate & easily snuffed out. Their spiritual beauty is fragile.
And when they lose their spiritual beauty, all that remains is their quasi impersonation of the masculine, and the negative elements of the feminine.
And you know what this looks like, because you've met plenty of feminists.
They are all damaged, failed women.
It's very sad.
If you enjoyed this thread, you can find more than 60 others freely available at
If you want to support my work and get something back in return, you can purchase my audiobook at
Low self worth and agonising self pressure vs. supreme confidence and elegance in execution - both can (and often do) appear in the same person.
This is a seeming paradoxical contradiction at odds with itself until you realise the transmuted energy of the former is responsible for the exceptionality of the latter.
That is to say, it was only by so strongly hating their powerlessness and inability that they were able to cultivate the capacities that brought them their confidence - but this is fragile, and performance based as they never got rid of the psychological scaffolding (self-agonising) that got them there, and so if due to their very human limitations their performance dips or somehow despite their very best (super)human efforts they fail, they very quickly shift from elitistly self-assured to self-punishingly strivingly.
"What's the solution?"
I will be crude: stop trying to please your asshole parents. They're not gonna love you any deeper or more profoundly because you're successful or useful in some way. Love shouldn't have to be earned, but you were taught it is - that's why you're like this
The pursuit of excellence as the pursuit of validation from parents who can show you respect for competence, but never actually showed unconditional love
So you chase basic praise without knowing real warmth or affection
One of the greatest differences between a man and a woman, is when a man trains a woman to be exactly what he wants her to be, he loves her more for becoming his ideal, but when a woman trains a man to be exactly what she thinks she wants him to be, she loses respect for him, then disposes of him.
This is the difference between knowing what you want and leading, and falsely thinking you know what you want - and misleading.
Men are architects, women are saboteurs - even of their own dreams
Because to be an architect requires clarity of thought, vision and ambition in alignment.
And women, as the chaos bringing rather than order generating principle are incapable of that consistency
Unfit to lead.
This is why if a woman trusts her judgement more than she trusts yours - you have no business attempting to create anything with her
She is either so foolish she truly believes her judgement is on par with, if not superior to yours
A man’s vulnerability is sort of like spiritual porn to a woman, they get off to the connection, but feel disgusted in the aftermath. It’s the desire for authenticity and connectivity (with the man) without the capacity to take responsibility for the full weight of his feelings.
Like you know how a young guy with no wisdom or maturity wants to have sex with the cute young girl, but can’t really handle the full weight of looking after?
Same here. Women want full spectrum shared spiritual emotional connection.
But can’t handle a man who breaks polarity.
Vulnerability outside the context of “I went through some bad shit and I conquered it” or “I’m going through some bad shit but don’t worry I’m a fucking warrior and will conquer all of it” results in a polarity break. Loss of confidence? Polarity break. Despair? Polarity break.
Funniest thing about regular women is they call you evil when you give actual wisdom derived insight/ metaphysical analysis because their fragile egos can't appreciate nuance or handle the implications.
But if you sabotage them with ego affirmations they believe unquestioningly.
Which is actually why evil is more permeating and pervasive and the default and "stays winning"
Because it takes less skill, and there's less resistance to it
It literally takes 10x the skill to be a good, strong but ruthless man than just a straight up predator
And the thing is, all good men - in the real sense of the word - as in, could fuck your shit up and exploit you maximally against your best interest for their self-interest *BUT DOESN'T* functionally knows how to be a predator - they just choose not to be.
What do working out, *WINNING*, sex and getting paid all have in common for a man?
They make you feel powerful.
And it's crucial to a man's mental health to feel powerful. Regularly.
I believe this is the cure to depression in men. Depression in men = sense of powerlessness.
This is why men tend to be solutions focused rather than catharsis focused (though the latter does happen too) - just give them a way to feel powerful again, and you'll "fix them" - that's it. Being understood is great too, but it comes AFTER that, not BEFORE it.
Mainstream doesn't understand this, because mainstream is feminised to the point men are basically alien to them.
This is why it tries to apply female ways of doing things to male needs, and fails epically
The greatest lie the devil ever convinced you was that beauty is weakness, and ugliness is strength.
This is a widely believed illusion - a state of mass hypnosis almost, but it is functionally, archetypally untrue.
Being negative takes *ZERO* skill - so how can it be strength?
Just because some are more talented in the negative than others, as in, more creative and forceful with it, doesn't make them strong - makes them dangerous, yes, but not strong - dangerousness is not strength if we define strength as the capacity of a soul to resist impurity.
They are dangerous because they are influential, and because they can self-perpetuate the memeplex of destruction, because they are a chaos variable, but they are not strong, because they failed to preserve the inherent beauty they were born with, they let this world spoil them.