Writer. Thinker. High Truth Preference. Newsletter: https://t.co/hxELRsljIH
159 subscribers
Nov 19 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
Following emotion makes for a bad compass.
As there's morally bad things that feel good, and morally good things which feel bad
And it takes a sufficiently benevolent and cunning man to ensure you only feel good whilst doing good.
This is essentially the art of managing women.
But it's that inherent propensity to trust, obey and be compelled by emotion that makes women a liability - it's what makes them more manipulable and influenceable even at advanced age.
It's why a "woman who knows better" will still make mistakes.
Because he made it feel right.
Oct 10 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
If we define maturity as having empathy for you as a man, and we define empathy as having some insight into male psychology/your struggles and complementing that.
Then yes, most women never mature.
Only women who really have empathy for men are outliers with good dads.
Because it's not to truly understand you and connect with you, but it's to worship you for so long as you do not destroy the illusion they have of you
So you see, there is no empathy, because there is no maturity
Sep 24 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
From her perspective it’s accepting less than she thinks she’s worth because she’s not truly respectful of or attracted to the man she decided to marry
That’s why she calls it settling
In reality, she’s lucky to even have a man who thinks she’s worth the bother
She’s conceited
Imagine you have multiple potential investors and the least intelligent and poorest of them’s the only one who agrees to invest
And instead of being grateful you got the help you needed
You resent having to settle for your least preferred investor
The arrogance is breathtaking
Sep 18 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Competing with a woman as a man is like competing with a child as an adult.
There is no upside for you.
If you win, you’re a bully, and if you lose, you’re a gay that got beat by a child/girl.
The asymmetry is inherently not in your favour.
This is why you need a pet woman as your champion to fight battles you can’t.
You actually see corporations do this all the time, even the police do it.
The police will use women to arrest women so they can’t fabricate a sexual abuse claim and so it doesn’t look as bad to the public
Elon has Linda Yaccarino to be the aligned HR mum for his company to offset all his “advertiser unfriendly” aka based masculine behaviour.
It’s amusing when you see it, but also an invaluable tool for you strategically.
All I will say is that the typical woman is not up to the task to “be your champion”.
It won’t be your wife, unless you married the wrong woman.
You’re looking for an unmarriageable, intelligent but knows how to be aggressive type of careerist woman who is tough and less delusional but has both positive masculine and negative feminine traits.
The whole “power couple” meme is very rarely done right and for the most part is just a man who married a masculine woman getting dictated to but thinking he’s in charge because he relies on her the way you would typically rely on a man.
It’s almost homosexual as zero polarity.
Sep 18 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
Being a top 1%er in any domain is shit because you have to suffer the tedium of almost everyone being shitter than you before getting curb stomped by an absolute alien who outpaces you by a factor of 10.
In chess that’s Magnus.
In football it’s Ronaldo.
In business it’s Musk.
Play literally any video game competitively and you will always find one absolute alien who makes all the other pros look shit (even though they’re all better than you)
It’s a universal phenomenon
Apr 27 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Women used to dealing with men who are always trying to prove their worth to them, don’t know how to be unannoying to men with nothing to prove to them.
They’re so used to getting to choose, that they haven’t actually developed the elegance necessary to get a man to choose them.
I can always tell when a woman who’s used to men trying to prove their worth to her is trying to get me to prove my worth to her
But what she fails to understand is:
I don’t give a shit what she thinks
It’s an affront to me she thinks she’s so above me she gets to test me
No.
Apr 9 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
The very dirty and messy work of being a man is having to be mean and punishing and villainous sometimes, BECAUSE IF WE ARE NOT we'll get treated like subhuman garbage and so merely to be afforded even a basic level of respect we have to teach you to fear us so you treat us well.
Exceptions notwithstanding, the vast majority of people seem to be incapable of treating men well if they do not possess an element of fear in regards to that man, as in, an acknowledgement of his destructive capacity/threat potential and a desire not to be on the receiving end of it.
Awareness of this capacity is the basis for all rudimentary respect and civil behaviour, and guides one's conduct towards him going forward. The absence of a dangerous element, or the belief it is not there leads to repeated violations of said man's dignity by the unafraid, who in its absence perceived or otherwise takes that to mean he is prey and thus exploitable and expendable.
If you are a man dealing with women or children this is especially true (due to their immaturity and dependence) and if you're dealing with low IQs it is likewise amplified because the stupid are best persuaded by aggression they can feel rather than reason they struggle to grasp.
Apr 3 • 7 tweets • 4 min read
Let’s play a little game. Forget the fact none of these people are real. There are five women. Look at the faces of each woman. Identify the most wholesome woman of the five based on facial analysis alone. Note: there *IS* a correct answer. I may or may not reveal the answer.
I will give you a vague hint
A lot of you keep saying the same thing and I can see why you would say that
But it’s wrong
Dec 8, 2023 • 6 tweets • 4 min read
Society needs marriage, but it also needs to structurally bias marriage in men's favour by ensuring they don't waive their rights by agreeing to it, because without legal protections for them it's all downside, no upside. You are signing yourself up to be asset stripped and humiliated under the current system. You will reproduce, yes, but your legacy will be in shambles because you weren't given scope to properly govern what you were trying to build.
Female fickleness and infidelity should carry a heavy social and legal penalty, to the point engaging in such behaviour is so undesirable to them that they don't engage in it. If they can get away with being shitty human beings, they will be. If a woman knows she will get to keep her children and a fat pay out on top, she is more than happy to fuck over her husband rather than try to work with him if she becomes displeased with him.
Women who don't have religious faith, community pressure or legal penalties for being terrible people will continue to be terrible people, and western women have demonstrated this reality for the past few decades. This is why our families are the weakest they've ever been, and we are more socially atomised than we've ever been - in failing to adequately discipline women and require they sacrifice anything for their families - we've sacrificed the very institution of family itself to their neuroticism, estrogen and capriciousness.
Anyone with sense knows we cannot rely on or simply trust women to behave themselves and be good moral people because they're sweet and lovely. They need guard rails, boundaries and consequences - like a child - or they will act in heinous ways.
The powers that be know this, but for some reason seem intent on sabotaging our societies with rules and cultural norms that lower our birth rate and ability to maintain ourselves whilst replacing us with foreigners who hate us for the actions of our ancestors, so our only options now are to navigate this toxic environment by only marrying outlier women because the vast majority of women are unmarriageable, or moving to a jurisdiction where men are still respected and will have their authority backed by the system and culture there - whether that means marrying a foreign woman in her lands and staying there or taking a western woman to a more traditional jurisdiction is down to personal preference.
It's normal and natural to want to stay in your land of birth and have an affection for your home culture no matter how flawed it is. Most people don't want to leave and travel elsewhere, learn a new culture, new language and be an outsider.
But the system is against you here.
Nov 24, 2023 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
Clever men are unattractive to women if they're not ruthless, courageous and quintessentially masculine in all the ways that come naturally to the brute in much the same way clever women are unattractive to men if they allow their smarts to make them coarse, wilful and inelegant.
High IQ men are less likely to be masculine and high IQ women are less likely to be feminine because their greater cognitive ability gives scope for the expression of traits the opposite sex detests.
Women don't care for nerdiness, and men don't care for immodesty and arrogance.
Nov 21, 2023 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
We live in a society that complains men aren't masculine enough after creating an environment that is actively hostile towards it, but then insists anyone who can actually help with the issue is toxic because it cannot face the truths that threaten its fragile sensibilities.
The church failed in this matter
The schools failed in this matter
Millions of single mothers failed in this matter
All of them complain men aren't good enough and are quick to tell you what is toxic and wrong, despite the fact none of them are actually any good at making men.
Aug 25, 2023 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
People who lack self-awareness have opinions and beliefs which reflect their sentiments rather than the reality of how things work.
They tell you what they believe, but what they believe’s false and thus misleading.
It’s for this reason I disregard almost all women’s opinions.
She can believe what she’s saying wholeheartedly, but it doesn’t make her any less wrong.
Level of passion is not level of accuracy.
If a man is to lead he must be wise enough to know when he is being petitioned by the passions of a fool so their rhetoric does not mislead him.
Aug 20, 2023 • 9 tweets • 2 min read
Other than attaining high testosterone levels, I believe the next biggest lifehack for a man is being able to make money without an employer.
That means being an independent contractor, your own boss, your own hustle, making a living by selling and cooperating but not obeying.
Evil always triumphs over good because it's willing to do things good won't do in order to get its way.
If you think this world is fair, moral, just or correct - you're delusional and wrong.
The only justice we have are those who can be evil directing that evil at other evil.
Literally, your definition of a good guy is just an evil guy who only hurts other evil guys and leaves innocents alone.
That's it.
Literally that simple.
The line is that thin.
Jul 28, 2023 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Women's whining tries to psy-op the population into believing most men are manipulative abusers.
But most men are less manipulative and ruthless than women.
But women ignore those men and go for the arrogant manipulative ones.
They do it to themselves because they're retarded.
They ignore the vast majority of men, and all share a same specific type THAT'S BAD FOR THEM - then act like that's all that exists
But then tell a man who's complaining about an average woman he just chose the wrong woman and shouldn't generalise
It's breathtakingly hilarious.
Jul 24, 2023 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Women will be in fully fledged relationships with men in their head who haven't even committed to them, whilst being mentally checked out of relationships they are in long before they actually end.
Her level of attachment to you doesn't care about your boundaries.
This is why some of the men they speak about from their past weren't even boyfriends. As in, she had zero status or title. They are just men she had strong emotional attachments to
To a woman's mind, strong emotional attachment = "we are a thing"
Even if they weren't or aren't.
Jun 29, 2023 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
Less mature people are liabilities who need to be managed to prevent them from self-destructing and causing second/third order problems.
This means:
-Any low IQs in your family
-Women in your family
-Obviously children
-Any narcissists
Immature = chaotic and needs leadership.
Low IQ men and narcissistic men should not be allowed into positions of leadership within any structure, especially the family, and do untold harm to their subordinates when given an order bringing position of responsibility due to their inherently chaotic and unstable natures.
Jun 13, 2023 • 12 tweets • 3 min read
The smarter and less self-absorbed you are, the better able you are to communicate your needs and understand the needs of others.
The dumber and more self-absorbed you are, the more you believe people who don't just magically get you are stupid even though you don't get them.
With the self-absorbed there's an expectation others should get them without them having to explain, even though they don't understand others and often don't even care to despite claiming they do and being unable to prove it.
Basically, solipsism and low IQ cause empathy issues.
Jun 13, 2023 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
@LifeMathMoney Now she has to live the rest of her days knowing the consequences of her sluttery resulted in her son's suicide, of course, if she's like most women she'll cope by deflecting the blame elsewhere because she wouldn't be able to live with herself if she accepted the truth.
@LifeMathMoney The masculine response is to hate yourself for your error and use that hate to transcend everything else you hate about yourself and become a better man.
The feminine response is to eternally avoid the topic and live in a delusional not my fault bubble.
Is why they stay losing.
Jun 10, 2023 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
Thoughtful disagreement is an act of respect, because it means they care enough about you to spend their time cognitively toiling to expend the fruits of their thinking earnestly explaining why they think you're wrong.
The disrespectful would mock and the apathetic would ignore.
I will be honest in admitting that with each passing year I become less generous in my willingness to explain, and more thrifty with who I spend my mental efforts on. I won't waste time on the unproven unless they show potential, and it's rare I think someone has potential.
Jun 6, 2023 • 9 tweets • 2 min read
A woman has to decide whether she's going to partner up with a man and be the best housewife she can be so she will get provided for OR accept she will be working long hours and grinding corporate for the rest of her life. Failure to be good at either is what results in poverty.
Now of course some insecure woman with trust issues is going to come along and say "what if I'm a good wife and he leaves me anyway"
You're missing the point. Corporate can fire you and make life hard too. The point is you have to pick a path, specialise in it and be good at it.
