The update was no better than the original. We have not, in fact, feuded with Snopes as to whether we publish satire or misinformation. Snopes retracted that insinuation with an editors' note saying it was never their intent to call our motives into question.
It's therefore misleading and malicious to characterize that incident as a feud, as if Snopes ever openly stood by the claim that we are misinformation and not satire.
These mischaracterizations from the Times are nothing new. Previously, Times reporter Kevin Roose wrote a defamatory piece that claimed we "capitalize on confusion" and that we have a "habit of skirting the line between misinformation and satire," whatever that means.
But they know better. In fact, Roose himself contradicted the title of his own piece by acknowledging in his conclusion that, "The Babylon Bee is not a covert disinformation operation disguised as a right-wing satire site, and is in fact trying to do comedy."
For better or worse, the NY Times is considered a "reliable source." We cannot stand idly by as they act with malice to misrepresent us in ways that jeopardize our business.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Planned Parenthood has finally acknowledged their racist roots, so what do the fact checkers who ran defense for them (and their founder Margaret Sanger) have to say for themselves?
Fact checkers had every opportunity to hold Planned Parenthood accountable. But here's @NPR "debunking" what Planned Parenthood now admits is true: npr.org/sections/itsal…
Here's @snopes trying to create distance between Sanger and the KKK, even as they admit she spoke at a klan rally. They claim she "disparaged" the klan's mission and only spoke to them to reach a wider audience. snopes.com/fact-check/mar…
In an article about Facebook's difficulty in dealing with satire, the New York Times points to The Babylon Bee as an example of a "far-right misinformation site" that "sometimes trafficked in misinformation under the guise of satire." nytimes.com/2021/03/19/tec…
Here's the section of the article where they quote Emerson T. Brooking making this claim. Booking is described as "a resident fellow for the Atlantic Council who studies digital platforms."
No other examples of far-right misinformation sites are offered. The Babylon Bee is the only one cited in this piece.
So after a manual review, Facebook says they stand by their decision to pull down this article and demonetize our page. I'm not kidding. They say this article "incites violence." It's literally a regurgitated joke from a Monty Python movie! babylonbee.com/news/senator-h…
In what universe does a fictional quote as part of an obvious joke constitute a genuine incitement to violence? How does context not come into play here? They're asking us to edit the article and not speak publicly about internal content reviews. Oops, did I just tweet this?
A Black Lives Matter leader said that if change doesn't happen, they'll "burn down this system." That's allowed on Facebook. You can quote it. You can link to it. But a Monty Python joke about burning a witch at the stake? That's incitement to violence. 🤡 show.
Interesting how they call us a "right-wing satire site." The Onion, however, is just satire to them. And yet they acknowledge right on the heels of that description that we "don't pull any punches . . . everything is fair game: the left, the right, Trump."
They do at least note that we get we more traffic and social engagement than The Onion. Perhaps they should have described The Onion as a left-wing, less popular version of The Babylon Bee. 😂
You guys won't believe how hard I've worked to bring you this new site. For months, I stood behind our team of developers, repeatedly asking them what's taking so long. I don't even like standing. It was terrible.