It comes as an unpleasant surprise.
I was reading the published multi-year correspondence between Kawabata and Mishima (both of whom I admire). it is entirely about very mundane things: weather, food recipes, travel, publishers.
War is never mentioned, even if the exchange of letters begins in the Spring of 1945.
But then suddenly Kawabata describes his manipulation (although he does not call it such) of PEN to become a candidate for Nobel.
Then asks Mishima to write a recommendation. Mishima rightly (and very politely; he is a junior partner in this relationship) replies that, given his reputation, it may be counterproductive.
But Kawabata insists; claiming that it is important for Japan to get a Nobel in literature, never mind he is scheming for himself.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Branko Milanovic

Branko Milanovic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BrankoMilan

28 May
Many years ago when I read Neruda's excellent memoirs (I would suggest the book to everyone), I was a bit puzzled by Neruda going ecstatic in front of every Siberian dam when the same dam would leave him ice- cold in the US.
But then I thought I understood.
A dam built by capitalists is built by clever rich people who try to extract money by selling electricity to the poor. And they are clever enough to have hired the best engineers to do it.
But a dam built by workers is built in order to provide the light and heat to other workers. And workers thereby showed that, however downtrodden and mistreated they historically were, they could match best capitalists.
Read 7 tweets
27 May
My article "After the Financial Crisis: The Evolution of the Global Income Distribution Between 2008 and 2013" just published today:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ro…
Using the newly created, and in terms of coverage and detail, the most complete household income data from more than 130 countries, the paper analyzes the changes in the global income distribution between 2008 and 2013.
This was the period of the global financial crisis and recovery. It is shown that global inequality continued to decline, largely due to China’s and India’s high growth rates that explain about two-thirds of the global Gini decrease between 2008 and 2013.
Read 4 tweets
23 May
(A thread; of interest to few).
Rereading @IsabellaMWeber book, a Q (to me) naturally arises:
Why were Chinese utterly uninterested in Yugoslav socialism? There were important EEuropean participants but no Yugoslav (except A Bajt and his role was minimal).
It is a puzzle.
Yugo (SFRJ) was way ahead in "reforms" compared to HUN, CZE, POL. The issues discussed by Brus, Sik in 1980s in China were issued discussed in SFRJ in 1965. So why were the Chinese uninterested in a more "advanced" socialist reform?
Several possibilities.
1 Chinese invited EEuropean "emigré" economists who tried reforms in their own countries (Kornai does not fit that scheme though). SFRJ had no significant "emigré" economists to invite. The were all in country.
Read 5 tweets
22 May
(Long thread on Africa)
I enjoy reading @scepticalranil weekend Economics & Marginalia. They are great commentated weekly summaries of the new in development and around development.
In his latest
cgdev.org/blog/economics…
Ranil kindly comments on my recent "primer" on global inequality. He likes it, but he thinks that I am wrong on the lack of African convergence. But while there is unconditional convergence in the world, this is thanks to Asia. Not Africa.

glineq.blogspot.com/2021/05/notes-…
Look at the next picture: it gives you the ratio of Sub Saharan Africa's population-weighted GDPpc to the global mean GDPpc (all in international dollars).
It shows that around independence Africa's GDPpc was about 1/2 of the world level.
Read 6 tweets
19 May
I faced this "my nation is being exploited" problem in 1987 when I did my dissertation on income inequality in Yugoslavia. Household surveys (run since 1963) had data on 6 republics plus 2 provinces, and for 4 social groups (worker, farmer, mixed & pensioner households).
You could realistically choose either to be a "Marxist" and look how inequality between and within social groups evolved, or to be a "nationalist" and do the same for republics.
It was quasi impossible to do for both because you would have 8x4=32 partitions for each year.
I chose the "Marxist" approach which was problematic b/c within each social group, most of the income gap was due to the fact that e.g. workers in different republics had systematically different wages.
So nationalist approach would have made some (or more) sense.
Read 5 tweets
17 May
I am surprised that people reacted so strongly to my comment (both positively and negatively). The answer to my comment is not to list multiple area-studies articles. The answer is to consider whether the following is true or not:
1 The number of alternative political regimes has expanded significantly since 1990s whereas the number of economic regimes has shrunk.
2 But my *impression* is that most of new ways to organize political life are considered as "failed" or "fallen" democracies--while they may...
...be genuinely new durable types. It seems to me that e.g. the Iranian system with pre-vetted candidates and yet free elections is a system that cannot be just seen as "imperfect democracy".
Similar for royalist full-franchise w/o responsible govt like Jordan and Morocco.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(