This clip really does remind me why Miliband lost. Why Labour lost and will lose. For Labour to adopt a ‘Rejoin’ position wld be political suicide. But to ‘embrace’ Brexit and praise it as a ‘big idea’ is a painfully shallow, opportunistic and dishonest populist ploy. Why?
1) Because Brexit is transparently not a ‘big idea’ in any meaningful sense. Its grandiose aspirations - such as they are - are entirely disconnected from any realistic understanding of the real world, whether in regard to trade, migration, or geopolitics.
It’s a ‘big idea’ only in the sense that ‘Make America Great Again’ is a big idea. Brexit is based on a very similar combination of bitter nationalism, national exceptionalism, national victimhood, all fused with imperial nostalgia. This isn’t ‘big’; it’s toxic and dangerous.
2) Miliband is ‘embracing’ an idea whose negative and harmful economic consequences are becoming clearer with each passing week, and about which Labour has been shamefully silent.
3) SMEs, farmers, fishermen, musicians, transport, hospitality - all these sectors have been harmed by a ‘big idea’ that promised the exact opposite of what is actually happening, in part because Brexiters never understood what this ‘big idea’ meant.
4) European nationals are now being detained and deported as a result of this ‘big idea’ - why is Labour not supporting them?
5)This ‘big idea’ now threatens to pull the Union apart - not a bad thing to my mind, but definitely not what its progenitors intended
6) Brexit has consolidated the power of the hard right in British politics, breaking its flimsy systemic checks and balances to the point when the most corrupt government in British history enjoys almost complete impunity. Would Miliband ‘embrace’ that too?
7) Brexit has instrumentalised the ‘culture wars’ that are destroying even nominal notions of the common good and which are making it ever more unlikely that a left of centre government will take power - unless in coalition of some kind
8) Miliband’s clumsy populist gestures - presumably aimed at placating the ‘Red Wall’ makes such a coalition more difficult and unlikely. Even Remainers who don’t believe it’s possible to ‘rejoin’ - at least now - will be offended and put off by this language
9) Miliband says ‘the argument is over’ - it clearly isn’t, because this argument was always in part an argument about what kind of country the UK should be. By ‘embracing’ Brexit, Labour reduces its ability to reverse the negative consequences of Brexit or even mention them.
10) All very disappointing. But very much in line with Miliband’s previous position on migration - privately recognising its advantages while publicly maintaining a hardline stance and boasting about immigration controls etc
So even in a difficult strategic environment,Labour ought to serve up something more than this lukewarm populist latte otherwise it will lose the voters it might have had & not get the ones it’s aiming for, and things will never get better &;may get a hell of a lot worse.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let’s have a look at the ‘way of life’ Lee Anderson wants to defend, shall we ? The former Labour councillor-turned-conservative certainly has a colourful record
In 2021, he was appointed to the Women and Equalities Committee, even though he had previously been reprimanded by the party: mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…
In 2019 he was caught on video setting up a supposedly impromptu doorstep with a constituent he already knew: theguardian.com/politics/2019/…
Conventional wisdom has is that voters should never be blamed, only politicians. As if voters are inherently virtuous.
They aren't. And what I see now is politicians & voters reinforcing each others' worst instincts and working together to turn UK politics into a moral vacuum
To put another way. If you voted Tory yesterday you don't care that tens of thousands of people have died who needn't have died if the government had acted more quickly and managed the pandemic more coherently
You're not bothered that the virus was effectively seeded in care homes, that billions of pounds have been siphoned up in NHS procurement contracts that produced inferior outcomes, that a Test & Trace system has never worked, despite the vast sums thrown at it
One of the striking similarities between rightwing populist movements in the UK and US is the way they present a vision of society in thrall to 'the far left' or 'commies' at a time when the left is largely powerless in practical terms in both countries.
They do this by presenting even left-of-centre movements/individuals as 'far left' or 'socialist' when they are nothing of the kind. Thus Biden and the Democrats are described as 'radical', and moderate soc democratic reforms as 'communism/Venezuela' etc
When it's pointed out that the 'far left' doesn't have power in either country, they will throw in the (false) idea that the left has a cultural hold on society to compensate for its distance from government, and uses this power to attack 'their history/institutions' etc
Just been looking at the review of this new book Failures of State: The Inside Story of Britain’s Battle with Coronavirus. It looks like an essential look back at the catalogue of horrific and unforgivable errors committed by the government, not to mention shockers like this:
I was struck by the reviewer’s suggestion that a book like this may be part of a ‘reckoning’ with the Johnson government at some point when the post-vaccination bounce has worn off. It would be comforting, up to a point, to believe that this will happen. However,
There are various factors that make this ‘reckoning’ outcome unlikely. One is the control of the narrative by a ruthless, corrupt and immoral government that takes responsibility for nothing and will do everything it can to ensure that no one else tries to get it to do so
Whether it’s the Capitol assault (Antifa & Pelosi caused it!), Brexit eco damage (the EU is punishing us!) or Priti Patel (she’s being bullied!), the new populist right now lies brazenly and without shame in an attempt to turn reality inside out. It’s utterly obscene & corrupt
We have now reached the point when it could be night outside, and the populists will look out the window and say ‘no it’s daytime’ even though they know it isn’t, and their supporters will go ‘yes of course it’s daytime’ simply because the people they hate have said it’s night
Having rejected the notion of expertise (elitist!) or knowledge based on facts, they are free to say that night is day if they feel like it, because what they feel and what they want is more important than the fact that the moon and stars are up there above their heads
So the GFA begins to unravel, exactly as predicted. Exactly what the little boys with matches who went romping into the oil refinery said would never happen. Proving once again that Brexit was a reckless & unforgivable act of political arson theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/m…
Given their long tradition of sectarian murder, who believes that the protests against the NI Protocol promised by the UVF, UDA and Red Hand Commando will be ‘peaceful and democratic’ for long? Esp. after the threats last month thejournal.ie/larne-brexit-c…
In its statement rejecting the protocol, the LCC warns of the ‘strength of feeling’ in the loyalist community regarding the NIP. So it’s very much ‘peaceful and democratic’ protests for now but...