In recent days I've noticed the BBC improving its game in clearly, and now properly, quoting vaccination numbers as proportions of the whole (or just adult) population. Thanks. Now how about quoting total deaths using the full ONS death-certificate number (152,183)?
Not quoting the full number of Covid deaths, apart from being extraordinary propaganda, insults the dead and their bereaved families. And it insults your intelligence and mine. I don't know why we put up with it.
Ask yourself which number YOU want to know: the one on the left, or the one on the right?
There are those who want to say 'ah but' about the full number - "ah but maybe Covid was only one of the causes", "ah but maybe they had Covid and were run over by a bus" etc. Sorry, I'm not interested. If the death certificate cites Covid as causal, that's enough for me. End of.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some junior folk in my office arranged for a brilliant £200k freebie for me to fix up my pad (no crappy £30k annual grant for me) and then, when that fund didn't work out, they forgot to mention it and watched me carry on spending the £200k! Amazing eh? Can't get the staff.
And honestly, I was so busy personally vaccinating people at that time that, as the golden rolls of wallpaper went up around me, and my world became a whirlwind of garish pattern, it never occurred to me to double-check that it was still all free and now it turns out it wasn't!
Can you imagine? It's well known I'm short of cash. And who in their right mind would want GOLD wallpaper if they were having to pay for it themselves?
FFS! BBC News at it again. 3pm headlines on Radio 4: "blood tests show 75% of people have antibodies". Absolutely not. The figures were for adults. They *keep* quoting stats which exclude children from the population, making the numberd sound misleadingly reassuring.
I expect better from BBC, but to be fair to them, ONS hides this as note 6 in its dataset: "The England population used in this analysis relates to the community population aged 16 years and over. It is not the same as the total population of England..."
OMG BBC News at Ten just said 37.5 million first doses meant 71.2% "of the population" had been given a dose. The population of the UK is circa 68.2m, so that number represents 55%.
They meant the *adult* population I suppose, but they made the same horrendous mistake twice.
And by the way, if 55% of the population have had 1 or 2 doses, then 45% have had none.
Doesn't sound quite so good that way round, does it?
If you're looking for a number close to 70%, it's this: 68% of the population have had either only the first dose, or nothing. Herd immunity is further away than BBC News would have you believe.
A non-binding referendum turned out to be absolutely binding.
A non-binding referendum turned out to be absolutely binding, and set in a tablet of stone - and to question it became traitorous heresy.
A non-binding referendum offering dramatic constitutional change - and disruption to a total population of half a billion people - was authorised without any requirement for a supermajority, and nevertheless turned out to be absolutely binding.
Let's talk about patriotism, shall we? People who love their country don't sit on their hands and do nothing when they know an infection is sweeping across their country.
Let's talk about patriotism, shall we? People who love their country do not destroy their country's trading position with the world's biggest trading union, or promise "free trade" and deliver the opposite, or deliver barmy borders within their own country.
Let's talk about patriotism, shall we? People who love their country do not run down its health service for a decade, leave its staff hideously unprotected, promise them a reward in due course and then offer them 1%.