Since 2 congressmen chose this week to teach the world the complicated business of serving lawsuits (and I'm relishing the opportunity to dump my process-server-anecdotes notebook), I've got one more story to share.
It's about the Proud Boys and Enrique Tarrio.
Tarrio was arrested, banished from DC days before the Capitol riot when he landed in town. He had allegedly destroyed the Metropolitan AME Church's Black Lives Matter banner in December.
On top of his arrest, the church sued Tarrio and the Proud Boys.
The lawsuit landed in DC Superior Court the same day as Tarrio's arrest, Jan 4.
The church's lawyers needed to get the suit into the hands of defendant Proud Boys International. So a process server delivered it to the group's registered agent, Jason Van Dyke in Texas, on Jan. 6.
But then something funny happened: Jason Van Dyke swore up and down he didn't represent the Proud Boys.
The lawsuit now in his hands but hell bent on distancing himself, Van Dyke started emailing. Then he started calling.
He had "nothing to do with the Proud Boys since November of 2018," he told the church's lawyers, according to court records.
But the lawyers, from the very big and experienced law firm Paul Weiss, had receipts: The certificate of formation for the Proud Boys from the Texas Secretary of State.
Van Dyke's name is on it.
The email exchanges really are something. Van Dyke keeps writing to everyone involved that he doesn't rep the Proud Boys. He's begging them to stop.
But Paul Weiss/the church keeps shipping him documents.
And what does the court do? They start sending Van Dyke case alerts.
Van Dyke is pretty mad by February. He picks up the phone and calls the church's lawyer at Paul Weiss, Jeannie Rhee. Threatens to seek sanctions against her
(Rhee is the former Mueller prosecutor who oversaw the Russian interference side of the investigation)
Transcript:
Again, Paul Weiss has receipts.
Time's up for the Proud Boys w the lawsuit, and Van Dyke never responded in court.
The church asks for a default win in the lawsuit.
And, they show the court evidence that Van Dyke is still working with/in contact with the Proud Boys.
So now what does the court do?
Default judgment. Metropolitan AME wins, because the Proud Boys never responded in court.
This is an example of why civil procedure is so important. (I have not gone to law school, but I've heard that's what people who have would say)
This story isn't over yet. Remember Enrique Tarrio, the Proud Boys chairman? He's the other named defendant in this Metropolitan AME lawsuit.
You might wonder how the church's process server found him to give him his copy, while the Proud Boys were apparently being recalcitrant
When the church filed the lawsuit on Jan 4, Tarrio was sitting in the DC Jail.
That's where the church's process server found him and handed him the papers: In the lobby of the jail release center the next day.
(Photos of this event exist, per the church's filings)
Tarrio, having been properly served and now filing responses, is still fighting the suit. He says it should be paused while he faces the criminal case.
"To be honest with you, I don't care," he also said about the church's suit.
Hearing set for late June. washingtontimes.com/news/2021/feb/…
If you enjoyed this story and other mini-soap operas about the service of lawsuits, court filings are a rich text.
Here's a thread with some more process server greatest hits. Several relate to Trump, Russia and/or other Washington luminaries.
Real talk: Rep. Eric Swalwell technically can't hand Rep. Mo Brooks his insurrection lawsuit when they pass each other in the halls of Congress or when they're both voting on the House floor.
To rewind, this twist came about yesterday. Swalwell sued his colleague Brooks, but Swalwell's lawyers (slash-their process server) say they can't get to Brooks, for a variety of reasons, some explained and some unexplained. Swalwell's team hires a P.I.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson reviewed lots of documents, found lots of misdirection from DOJ
-Barr's team was already working on telling Congress DOJ wouldn't prosecute Trump when appointees Steve Engel, Ed OCallaghan finalized a memo that was supposed to advise the AG on what to do
-DOJ lawyers in court trying to keep the memo secret told the judge it was legal/policy discussions, thus, able to be redacted under the law.
ABJ says it wasn't just deliberative, it was strategy too. DOJ was pretending in court it wasn't, she wrote
Next week marks 100 days since the insurrection, and it's now one of the most sprawling and intensive criminal investigations in American history.
Yet the crush of defendants and evidence in such an unusual set of cases created a logjam in court.
Flipping defendants was already in the works this week, per a court filing and my reporting yesterday.
But leadership at DOJ hadn't signed off on making deals w defendants to plead guilty. (Likelihood is that lots will go that route) cnn.com/2021/04/07/pol…
Guilty verdict of Michael Flynn’s former lobbying partner Bijan Kian, for illegally and secretly working for Turkey in 2016, will stand, 4th Circuit rules.
A trial judge had thrown out the jury verdict and ordered a new trial—but that was the wrong call, the appeals court says
The 4th Circuit said a jury was able to conclude that Kian and a Dutch-Turkish contact of his had conspired to work for Turkey and did not disclose the work to DOJ.
The court noted that it would “refrain from drawing conclusions with respect to Flynn’s alleged participation.”
What this means, in the big picture:
-Big win for DOJ in efforts to enforce FARA
-A reminder that Flynn Intel Group was advocating for Turkey’s interests in 2016–just as Flynn was about to become Trump nat sec adviser
-Flynn’s still got his pardon, and it covers the Turkey stuff
In the Capitol riot cases, judges have split on whether to keep defendants in jail before trial. That’s not unusual, given how the system works and the charges that are being used—but it’s a surprise to many people tuning into these cases cnn.com/2021/02/19/pol…
This report from 2018 really digs into the numbers on pretrial detention in the federal judiciary—and the reasons people are detained following an arrest. uscourts.gov/sites/default/…
I didn’t realize until reading this report how skewed the numbers are for Hispanic defendants being detained—and that’s bc immigration cases present more of a risk the person could flee the country, making detention far more likely for people arrested on immigration charges
Prosecutors investigated them in 2019 re: Stone's Instagram post about the judge in his case. Proud Boys leaders including Enrique Tarrio were subpoenaed for grand jury testimony. No charges resulted.
"They asked me about if I had anything to do about posting that. They were asking me if Stone has ever paid me, what he's ever paid me for," Florida Proud Boys head Tyler Ziolkowski told CNN this week.
Roger Stone's ties to the Proud Boys are still in the news following the Jan 6 Capitol riot.
This 2019 investigation, which hasn't been revealed before, shows prosecutors already looked into some aspects of the far-right organization's leaders' ties to Stone.