Facebook's Trump decision: suspended for 2 years. Best of it is that they will then consult outside experts and consider his behavior and conditions at the time before deciding whether to reinstate. about.fb.com/news/2021/06/f…
Now the hard question is: How does Facebook apply this to other authoritarians?
Facebook says in response to Oversight Board that it will implement fully this recommendation: "Facebook should suspend the accounts of high government officials, such as heads of state, if their posts repeatedly pose a risk of harm." transparency.fb.com/oversight/over…
I still think Facebook's original "indefinite suspension" of Trump was better than this but for that blame rests solely with the Oversight Board. In a sense this is still indefinite as it depends on Trump's behavior in the meantime, it just creates more dates for trouble.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Richard Stevens, chair of the UNC Board, wants me to share his email with the 300 journalism faculty and deans who signed the letter of protest regarding Nikole Hannah-Jones' appointment to the school. Here it is:1/
I responded that I take this as promising as I hope the board will offer Nikole Hannah-Jones tenure and will be the first to congratulate them. Otherwise, I am sure many schools would leap at the opportunity to hire a journalist of such singular reputation, and ability. 2/
More: I asked Stevens whether the board would vote on tenure. He responded: "Our last board meeting of the academic year was last week and my term as chair & as a board member is ending." I said: "It is a pity that your term ended without the milestone of hiring @nhannahjones."
This is good, as far as it goes. It is written from journalism's perspective without acknowledging media's larger strategy, its moral panic, against technology, playing out not only in print but in lobbying governments. 1/ nymag.com/intelligencer/…
See this paragraph from a proposal I'm working on. 2/
What the titan v. titan storyline misses is the public: "reader" to one side, "user" to the other. The internet gave people too long not heard agency; they are flexing their power and that is what scares the incumbents from media and their conspirators in politics. 3/
Now here's Niall Ferguson on TV making excused for Donald Trump and the pandemic.
As an antidote to the moral panic of Niall Ferguson & Morning Joe about disinformation and social media, please read this paper by @duncanjwatts, @DavMicRot & @markusmobius: "Fake news is a tiny proportion of Americans' information diets." google.com/search?q=measu…
N.B., @JoeNBC, that @BrendanNyhan said *elite* messages are where danger lurks: not your average Facebook post but lies from politicians and that other cable "news" channel that exploit group identity. 1/
What can we do? I'm working on a post arguing that we in media need to provide other paths for belonging: e.g., demonstrating to parents that they share concerns and needs as the start of conversation and journalism, rather than setting groups against each other. 2/
I'm grateful that @BrendanNyhan dismissed glib claims--hmm, wonder where--that Section #230 is the problem. The question is, how can we use Facebook + media to foster constructive paths of belonging and community.
I have spoken. I gave @ginoseast five pies in my very scientific survey/boondoggle for @people. (God, those were the days.)
Take that @mathewi
CC: @pilhofer
And then there is this, my welcome to San Francisco for Uno's and Chicago pizza. They used to hang this in every Uno's across the country. Those, too, were the days.
Here is my full report for People, thank goodness without the embarrassing picture of me in a red-striped pizza chef's outfit. people.com/archive/in-sea…
Legal Twitter is enjoying the nuances of the Oversight Board decision while information, political, and tech Twitter are viewing it through other sides of the prism, looking more at the impact, I think.
Many are enjoying the bind the Oversight Board put Facebook in. Meanwhile, that bind will be exploited by Trump et al over the next six months, doing more damage to the net as self-appointed net watchdogs from both right and left imagine new torture for #230, etc.
So *neither* Facebook nor the Oversight Board made a strong statement about the unacceptability of not only inciting insurrection but also promulgating the Big Lie against democratic elections. Both failed to keep their eyes on the highest priorities.