I'm absolutely fascinated by the mechanics of "Trump will be reinstated in August." How does any of this work? Who makes the final call? Does Pence get reinstated too? Is Biden supposed to just pack and go? What does SCOTUS do? Why didn't past presidents get "reinstated?"
Often in prophetic conspiracy theories, the details of whatever is supposed to happen shift constantly and aren't regarded as important by believers. That's because they aren't real, and therefore, they don't matter.
I understand that the threat of a coup or takeover isn't funny, and at least some Trump acolytes are taking it seriously. But it's also important to mock things that deserve mockery, even as we monitor them.
Like, what is supposed to happen here? Kagan and Sotomayor just go "eh, screw it, let's get Trump back in office" by voting for some case that doesn't exist? Biden's aide with the nuclear football says "you won't be needing me, sir" and heads to Mar-a-Lago? The mind boggles.
"Eric, get some old newspapers and a shopping bag, you're going to hold the nuclear football!"
"You got it, Real President!"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Russia's links to QAnon (whatever that even is anymore) are still nebulous, with no compelling evidence of anything beyond early social media boosting. Americans have always excelled at being sucked in by scams and conspiracy theories, so no links are really necessary.
People get unreasonably mad at me when I point that out, and if it were different, I'd gladly say so. But that's how it is. We tend to be our own worst enemy.
A former president in prison is one thing. A former president who commands an armed and violent personality cult is something else.
Look, if the evidence is there, indict him. But it's a pandora's box inside a pandora's box. Let's be clear about the potential consequences - and the potential of limited returns (ie, he pays a fine and declares victory.)
While there's no indication she had any link to QAnon, her motive for killing her children is the same as most Q-driven crimes I've seen: unshakable belief that her children were in mortal danger, and she had to stop it at any cost.
Mothers have killed their own children many times before. It never makes any sense, because it's inherently senseless. What a tragedy for everyone involved.
A lot of people are assuming this woman was a QAnon believer or obsessed with its mythology. I haven't seen any story that confirms this - only that she believed some elements of what other Q believers think. But even Q believers don't routinely kill their own kids.
The far left and the far right agree that everyone in between is merely a mark to be fleeced with all of the scams, schemes, grifts, fundraisers, crappy products, fraudulent investments, and pieces of content that Heaven will allow.
"Well, actually, the Krassensteins' politics..." - just stop. The only thing anyone knows them from is being anti-Trump and a major part of "the resistance" to him on social media. What else matters about them?
Nobody dedicated to fighting Donald Trump should be retweeting crypto investment schemes from a far right activist who led the campaign to overturn his election loss. What they all call themselves doesn't matter.
I get into Q proofs in THE STORM IS UPON US. One easy one to debunk are "deltas" between Q drops and Trump tweets. Short version: Trump tweeted a lot at regular times. If Q made drops during those times, some would invariably go up at almost the same time. It proves nothing.
If two unrelated statements go up at around the same time because one poster gamed out the times when the other poster made their statements, what is that supposed to prove? Most "deltas" not only say nothing, but aren't meant to say anything.
The point of "Q Proofs" is quantity, not quality. No one proof is especially compelling (though the McCain death one gets close). But Q believers will hit you with dozens or hundreds, and you give up on dealing with them. It's why debating a QAnon believer is pointless.