Colombia's #ParoNacional protests have highlighted main concerns for protecting the ability to use technology and the internet to speak up and organize.
.@Karisma and other groups have pointed to three urgent concerns:
1: The official narrative criminalizing those who protest online as “digital vandals” carrying out “digital terrorism" nacla.org/news/2021/05/1…
2: The use of technical and legal capacities to block Internet access and protest-related content netblocks.org/reports/intern…
3: The role of internet intermediaries in contexts of crisis and how they can do better in guarding users’ free expression
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Are you tasked with defending your colleagues' devices from ransomware? We've created this handout and phishing art critique activity as part of our free Security Education Companion resource. Some excerpts below. sec.eff.org/materials/malw…
(1/5)
Some definitions of malware and phishing from our sec.eff.org malware handout
(2/5)
Common ways malware is installed, from our sec.eff.org malware handout
We are calling on the California legislature to approve Governor Newsom's just-announced $7 billion investment in public broadband infrastructure, which would give California one of the largest public broadband fiber networks in the country. eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
Laying infrastructure like this brings terabits of broadband capacity to unserved and underserved communities throughout the state. This plan will dramatically lower the cost to the communities themselves, who are in charge of developing their own, locally appropriate plans.
As we’ve noted in the past, national private ISPs have proven themselves unwilling to tackle the rural and low-income urban fiber challenge. It is time to embrace local options.
Along with @ACLU, we have asked the Supreme Court to hear our challenge to the @DHSgov practice of warrantless and suspicionless searches of travelers’ electronic devices at international airports and other ports of entry. This case is years in the making: eff.org/press/releases…
In Riley v. California (2014), a landmark victory for digital privacy, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment requires police officers to get a warrant before searching the cell phones of arrestees. eff.org/document/amicu…
In Riley, the Court reasoned that we have extraordinary privacy interests in the massive amount of sensitive information we carry in our cell phones. caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-cou…
What happens to FOIA requests that go unanswered?
They get nominated for our Golden Raspberry-style "awards" for officials who stand in the way of government transparency and freedom of information.
For the first time we're giving an award to a dog! When @twocatsand_docs asked whether Conan, the canine injured in a raid against the Islamic State, was a boy or a girl, the Defense Department could neither confirm nor deny the dog’s gender. eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
Another faux award goes out to the U.S. State Department for refusing to release records about former Sec. Pompeo's preferred sandwiches and pizza toppings. eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
Don’t be fooled: Google’s latest announcement on third-party cookies doesn’t mean it will stop tracking you. Thread. vox.com/recode/2021/3/…
Last week, Google announced that after phasing out third-party cookies, “we will not build alternate identifiers to track individuals as they browse across the web, nor [] use them in our products.” That’s nice, but a far cry from not tracking you. blog.google/products/ads-c…
We’ve written about the problems with Federated Learning of Cohorts (FLoC), one of Google’s proposals to replace tracking cookies for advertisers. But even without this new technology, Google’s post-cookie surveillance will be nearly as powerful as ever. eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
Last fall, Apple & Google took action against data broker X-Mode after we learned of its ties to US defense contractors. Last month, Google kicked another location data broker from its stores—Predicio. These moves help users, but they’re not enough. Thread.eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
The data brokers, X-Mode and Predicio, have each been the subject of reports over the past year that reveal how U.S. government agencies—including the Department of Defense and ICE—try to work around the 4th amendment by buying location data on the private market.
In 2018 the Supreme Court handed down US v. Carpenter, a landmark decision which ruled that location data collected from cell towers is protected by the 4th Amendment—meaning law enforcement can’t get your location from your cell carrier without a warrant.eff.org/cases/carpente…