Let me get the good news on the G7 tax plan on the record. It is historic, it's a step in the right direction and it definitely is going to upset a lot of tax havens and some companies. So let's mark that up as a plus for tax justice. But then....a short thread
The 15% minimum tax rate is far too low: it should have been at least 21% and maybe more. The OECD average tax rate is around 25% and so this is a big concession to the low tax countries, including the UK and its tax havens
Next, there are many accounting problems in what has been announced. Who is defining profit margins? Is it one year or over time for example? And why 10%? That brings some pharmaceuticals in but leaves Amazon out. Is that what was intended?
And who defines what is tax paid? If that is an accounting issue then I sincerely hope deferred tax is ignored. If it is a current tax issue then my research shows most companies overstate tax due in their accounts and actually pay less. So which figure to use?
And come to that, where are sales? Are they where things are shipped from, or too? It's likely to be the destination, but that biases this whole deal to developed countries like the G7 where most consumption takes place. Is that fair?
And there are real problems with current Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development country-by-country accounting: are these going to be ironed out to stop gaming on this issue because that will be essential?
And how will the intense lobbying from the tax havens be managed?
And how will data on where sales are to be collected? Can we rely on companies to not manipulate that?
I welcome this deal, although not the rates, but what I really see coming the way of tax negotiators are a pile of accounting problems that almost none of them have ever had to deal with before. I am just hoping they are up to dealing with them. It's essential they do

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Murphy

Richard Murphy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RichardJMurphy

7 Jun
The time for pretence is over: the reality is that the UK is facing another Covid outbreak at least as serious as that earlier this year. This has massive economic consequences. So, a thread on what we need to think about this time.
First, the Treasury has to realise we lockdown to protect the economy. We don’t do it to harm it. We lockdown, provide support and accept the costs because the alternatives are worse.
What’s worse is not just in lives lost, or blighted by long Covid and racked by concern, although they are all bad enough. The alternative is bigger economic cost resulting from health care created chaos.
Read 61 tweets
31 May
I know that I am not alone on the left in wondering how, if ever, we might get rid of Tory rule in England, and so the UK as it now is. I am also far from alone in wondering why so many on the left are so determined to keep them in power. A thread....
The UK faces a vast range of problems right now. That I am aware of no issue that we face has an answer that requires smaller government, more privatisation, more discrimination and less care. In other words, there is no Tory answer to any issue that we face.
Despite this there is a widespread feeling that the Tories are in power to stay. It may not be Johnson, of course. Whether it’s Covid, Brexit or one corruption scandal too many that does for him I don’t know. But what is sure is that those who rise through scandal fall through it
Read 25 tweets
29 May
The new independent adviser on ministers’ interests, Christopher (Lord) Geidt gave two rulings yesterday. Both suggest that he is unfit for office...a thread.
In the first case he suggested that Boris Johnson did not break the ministerial code when having the prime ministerial flat refurbished. He suggested that Johnson was simply ‘unwise’ to allow the refurbishment without considering how it would be funded.
The project was initially paid for by Lord Brownlow, a Tory donor, and the Conservative Party. Geidt appears to have satisfied himself because Johnson, eventually, declared the arrangement.
Read 17 tweets
22 May
I remember the Bashir Diana interview. I remember thinking it weird that this almost unknown guy got it. But I also remember thinking she was pursuing her agenda. And now others are using it for their own agenda.
On a scale of 1 to 10 the BBC’s failings on this came in at about 3 compared with the 7 out of 10 for the tabloids on phone hacking, and the people involved in that survived.
Much more important though is that the current government comes in at 10 out of 10. Organised corruption is their crime, plus indifference to tens of thousands of deaths for which they’re responsible, about which they lie, persistently.
Read 6 tweets
16 May
The government is denying it, but the scientists are seemingly sure about the fact that we are facing another wave of Covid 19 infection. Reopening as planned could see hospitalisations at a rate greater than that in January. A thread on the consequences, and questions ….
Given that the government has get every stage of Covid management wrong my bet is that the scientists are closer to the truth on this issue than the government is. The likelihood that, yet again, Johnson will dither and cost the lives of tens of thousands is very high.
Like almost everyone I was looking forward to summer. With a second jab due soon, I wanted to be optimistic. But I am not. As with the Spanish flu, the likelihood that two waves is not the end of this story is now very high.
Read 45 tweets
9 May
There is one very clear message from this week’s elections. It is that politically the UK is in a very confused state. This needs some discussion. A thread follows.....
Scotland has a strong pro-independence majority at Holyrood. No one but a charlatan could deny it.
Wales has rewarded competent, even if slightly boring incumbency. Plaid Cymru did not make the cut through it hoped for. And yet Labour’s win is so distinct it feels like an expression of independent Welsh thinking nonetheless.
Read 31 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(