I've always thought that George Wallace's "I got out-n—d," on why he lost the 1958 governor's race, was essential to understanding white supremacy in the Jim Crow era—race hatred as an electoral tactic, race hatred as a verb.

The guy Wallace was referring to died this Friday.
The past, as the man said, is not past.
Which is, I guess, a pretty good pretext for sharing something I've had on my desktop ever since I stumbled across is a couple of months ago—a front-page New York Times headline from 1967.
The headline reads "Rusk's Daughter, 18, Is Wed to Negro," and it refers to the wedding of the only daughter of the sitting Secretary of State, Dean Rusk. Again, the story ran on the front page of the New York Times. Above the fold.
The second graf of the story says that Rusk offered his resignation to LBJ when he told him that his daughter was going to be marrying a Black man, and that LBJ declined it.

This was, again, in 1967. Just fifty-four years ago.
Sgt. Pepper was at the top of the charts, Bonnie and Clyde was at the top of the box office, and the US Secretary of State was offering to resign because he was concerned his daughter's marriage to a Black guy might embarrass the president.
And of course it was only that summer that the Supreme Court had announced its decision in Loving v. Virginia, legalizing interracial marriage in the sixteen states in which it was still illegal.
The wedding, by the way, didn't just make the front page of the New York Times. It made the cover of Time magazine, too.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Angus Johnston

Angus Johnston Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @studentactivism

5 Jun
Elvis: *shows me an assortment of "you got weezered" Tiktoks*

Me: I think I've reached the limit of my ability to understand Zoomer humor.

Elvis: I mean, you got pretty far.
To those who are asking if this is 2021's version of rickrolling … no. I mean, kind of, but also no. It's like that plus BOFA but … color-based? And then there's a bunch of other stuff mixed in. The video Elvis showed me included stock art of an apple for some reason.
(I asked, and apparently the apple was being transformed into an Among Us character. Also there was an Ed Sheeran joke because "Gen Z finds Ed Sheehan hilarious in a cringe way." The video was like 30 seconds long.)
Read 4 tweets
4 Jun
Honest question: Are there places in the US where ice cream trucks don't sell soft-serve?
A few people are saying there are a few soft-serve trucks outside NYC, but the consensus seems to be that they're overwhelmingly a New York thing.
So for context, in NYC, pretty much every ice cream truck—I want to say LITERALLY every truck, they're so ubiquitous—has one of these machines in it.
Read 10 tweets
31 May
Is it me, or are people getting the "X, let alone Y" construction backwards more and more often these days?
It almost feels like "much less" misuse is sloshing over into "let alone."
Someone mentioned "could care less" in replies, and that's one that I 100% have no problem with.
Read 7 tweets
30 May
Eddie Albert being in his late forties when he made Roman Holiday is the precise inverse of all of those “look at these middle-aged-ass teenagers from the olden days” threads. Image
Also, apparently the guy who played the barber was fucking the pope? Like, in real life?
(He wasn’t the pope yet, to be clear. But the actor who played the barber who cut all of Audrey Hepburn’s hair off was apparently in a long term relationship with the Archbishop of Milan, who went on to become Pope Paul VI.)
Read 5 tweets
28 May
This entire thread is bullshit, but this tweet in particular is specifically bullshit. When I donate to a campaign, I'm giving money not just to win a specific election, but to build power for progressive politics more generally. And paying staffers well is a part of doing that.
I donated to the Democratic candidate for the US Senate in IDAHO last cycle. Why? Because I wanted to support grassroots progressive politics in the state where my grandfather was a progressive activist. (Also she had a cool tee shirt. But mostly the other thing.)
I was adding my drop to the bucket so she could hire good staff and pay union vendors and distribute lit and provide opportunities for young volunteers. And I don't think I'm all that unusual for having done so.
Read 10 tweets
27 May
Everyone's dunking on Nate Silver today, but I'm not seeing a lot of people flagging his claim that when "one side" of a FACTUAL DISPUTE "is excessively concerned with policing the discourse…that side is more likely than not to be wrong."
I mean, let's start with how he puts his thumb on the scale with "excessively." Is "policing the discourse" evidence that you're in the wrong in a factual dispute? No, because of one side of the dispute is obviously incorrect, they're going to get yelled at more.
So the "excessively" isn't a rhetorical flourish. It's central to his argument. But how can "excessively policing the discourse" be measured? What does it refer to, other than someone's gut feeling that one group of people are yelling at another group of people for bad reasons?
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(