Share this page!

Bad COVID-19 Takes Profile picture
Twitter logo
6 Jun, 4 tweets, 2 min read
ImageImageImage
Context: I looked through the docket. It doesn't seem like anyone argued for or against this claim. It went from being a Facebook meme (or misremembered Fox News segment) to a federal decision with no intermediate steps.

It's false.
The CDC determined that 3 deaths are "plausibly" linked to the J&J vaccine out of millions of doses administered. Even the recent San Jose VTA shooting is more than that.
cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
Perhaps the judge is referring VAERS numbers (we can't tell because he gave no citation). Those aren't deaths "from" the vaccine; they're simply reported deaths. With half of the country now vaccinated, a lot of people will coincidentally die.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Bad COVID-19 Takes

Bad COVID-19 Takes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BadCOVID19Takes

Bad COVID-19 Takes Profile picture
31 May
Context: The tweet cuts off a the first page of results showing that nearly all of the massive overdose injection stays at the injection site or goes to the liver where it's metabolized.

h/t: @BadVaccineTakes for tracking this down.
@BadVaccineTakes Especially true in the case of the mRNA used in these studies. Less than one tenth of one percent of megadose made it to rat ovaries.

Oh, and it's not a leaked document. Antivaxxers love to get clout by rehashing old stuff as "leaked." Rarely true. pmda.go.jp/drugs/2021/P20…
Read 4 tweets
Bad COVID-19 Takes Profile picture
29 May
Image
Context: Bunch of folks are misunderstanding this comment to mean that vaccines are ~1% effective, but the absolute risk reduction is misleading too. The background rate of COVID was 0.9% in the Pfizer control group, and 0.06% for vaccinated. Huge drop.
Absolute risk reduction just isn't a measure of efficacy; it depends on the study protocols. Fewer people get infected over shorter studies. And authors of the paper admit that relative risk reductions have held up in Israel close to 95%.
Read 4 tweets
Bad COVID-19 Takes Profile picture
24 May
Context: almost certainly they misunderstand part of the Pfizer protocol, which doesn't suggest anything is "shedding," as explained in this thread.

h/t @cwarzel.
Thread on why it would be great if it were true.
Read 4 tweets
Bad COVID-19 Takes Profile picture
13 May
Here Naomi Wolf suggests criminal prosecution might be necessary for a teacher’s union that invested millions into a company she says harvests DNA from children without HIPAA protections.

TLDR: They don’t. That’s not how this works, that’s not how any of this works.
A partial list of issues: 1. CalSTERs has invested literally 0.004% of its portfolio into the company Wolf hates. 2. CalSTERS is legally obligated to protect its members’ retirement savings, and so can’t really make decisions based on Wolf’s unique theories.
Read 6 tweets
Bad COVID-19 Takes Profile picture
13 May
Context: Alex Berenson casually suggests the Ohio governor is guilty of war crimes because lottery tickers are "coercive." But by this logic, lotteries themselves are—they offer life-changing amounts of money for only $1, which even less commitment than getting the vaccine!
In fact, they're even more coercive because people can by endless tickets, and some in fact do ruin themselves this way. A chance for a single lottery ticket only constitutes "coercion" if you don't understand what a lottery is.
Read 4 tweets
Bad COVID-19 Takes Profile picture
8 May
ImageImage
Context: I'd like to walk through this, because this plot is sort of a Rosetta Stone of debunking bad takes. Image
First, Covid skeptics almost uniformly denied that cases were meaningless—up until they could snapshot a plot and blame the vaccines. They'd always claim that there are lots of "false positive" and that unnecessary testing created a "casedemic." Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @BadCOVID19Takes has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @BadCOVID19Takes!

Read all threads by @BadCOVID19Takes

:(