1. We wonder whether The Scottish Police Federation is aware of the contents of materials used in training their staff may be receiving and if we could bring this manual produced by the Council of Europe(CoE) to their attention? @DvdHmltn@CalumA_Steele
2. Produced by the CoE SOGI Unit in May 2017, not only does the manual conflate sex and gender; sexual orientation and gender identity, it misrepresents the law and contains extremely controversial definitions about who belongs under the 'trans umbrella'.
3. A 'crossdresser/transvestite' is described as someone who dresses as the opposite 'gender' because they find it fulfilling in emotional or sexual ways. According to the manual these people are also 'Trans'.
4. As is made clear: crossdressers/transvestites have a sexual fetish but nonetheless are 'Trans' in the law & should be given protections to access to single-sex spaces. This puts females in unnecessary danger and we are sure that the public would be outraged to learn this.
5. The European LGBT Police Association also called the European Gay Police Association has close links with the Scottish LGBTI Police Association: lgbtpolice.eu/the-board
9. We ask that you look into the matter urgently and if this manual is being used within the Scottish Police we would like you to take steps to ensure it is removed as quickly as possible so that your members are no longer trained to follow ideologies:
10. To our followers take note that Resolution 2048(2015) which is so often cited by the Scottish Government and public bodies was passed in favour of the YP by the Parliamentary Assembly of the CoE and the CoE SOGI Unit was responsible for producing this training manual.
11. The CoE is clearly confused and we are not surprised because ILGA features many times in the manual. We believe this further demonstrates the global policy capture so called LGBTIQ+ rights groups are engaging in within our national, regional and international institutions.
12. Please share this information with our sisters and brothers in the countries listed below so that they may take action to stop their police forces from being captured. Thank you.
14. Which police forces/countries are represented in these photos? If you recognise any please let us know. We would like to get in touch and make them aware of our concerns. Thank you.
1. Boycott them for sure. However brands like Coca Cola (who own #CostaCoffee) & Nike have far too much global reach and power for boycotts against them to be truly effective. The answer is to look at the root & challenge the #PGLE & ESG policies created by #BlackRock & the #WEF
1. Borloz is in the UK. While he seems to hold a 'respectable' position within the UN, his views on "sex" can only be described as those of extreme biology denialism.
He & others who signed the Yogyakarta Principles often discuss their desire to implement sex self-ID into law.
2. However, it is worth noting that they never openly discuss their aim to abolish the recording of "sex" on all official documents including birth certificates.
This is what Principle 31 of YP+10 calls for & as a signatory it is what Borloz endorses.
3. It is clear that Borloz does not wish to draw attention to the fact that he seeks to establish international policy, which would disconnect human beings from their registered birth sex, with profound human rights implications.
Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Spain, USA, Uruguay.
2. Lead by Argentina, these 28 states have just made a joint statement at the UN claiming that sex self-ID is an 'international human rights standard'. @RoisinMichaux
3. This is false and there is no obligation for member states to introduce sex self-ID, under any UN Treaty or human rights mechanism. The references they have cited in their statement confirm this fact.
3. If you are not based in the UK please see this thread for info about the UPR and why it is important to get involved. The UN OHCHR website contains information and deadlines for all UN member states.
1.We welcome the review/investigation into #Mermaids by the @TNLComFund & @ChtyCommission. There is evidence suggesting funding was previously awarded to them based partly on falsehoods relating to the Yogyakarta Principles (YP). #MermaidsInvestigation
2. In 2019 a report was produced by TNLCF's Director for Scotland to assist in a review of the decision to award £500K over five years to #Mermaids after concerns were raised. The report claims that YP are legally binding & that all states must comply. tnlcommunityfund.org.uk/media/document…
3. The YP are non-binding as confirmed by the UK Supreme Court. They do not represent 'international best practice'. They promote highly contested ideas such as making sex self ID the law & abolishing references to sex on a newborn child's birth certificate.
1. National consultations & the UN Universal Periodic Review.
States are not required to hold national consultations for the UPR but many do. Make sure your voices are heard & tell them what you think about the human rights situation in your country.