Gregory A. Daddis Profile picture
Jun 6, 2021 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
A 🧵on "sympathy for the devils."

I read @EvansRyan202's excellent thread on Afghanistan this week as I was writing an essay on the end of America's war in Vietnam. Revisiting the My Lai massacre after this and @dtaberski's "The Line," I was struck by some rough comparisons. Image
Particularly, the level of support Eddie Gallagher & William Calley, Jr. received from (far, far too many) Americans who supported both once learning of their war crimes. After Calley's guilty verdict, Sen. Adlai Stevenson's office was receiving mail 200-1 in favor of Calley. Image
Gallup polls suggested almost 70% of Americans thought Calley a "scapegoat." A Ga. American Legion Post tried to collect $100k for his defense fund, while the national VFW commander said this was "the first time in our history we have tried a soldier for performing his duty." Image
One Fla. congressman wanted Calley to address a joint session of Congress. The Wash. Post suggested the massacre only symbolized the "brutalization that inevitably afflicts men at war.” And, of course, "The Battle Hymn of Lt. Calley" was popular. ("They made me out a villain.") Image
Unsurprisingly, none of these apologists had access to the LT’s psychiatric reports, in which Calley stated “he did not feel as if he were killing humans but rather that they were animals with whom one could not speak or reason." We might ask if Gallagher feels similarly today. Image
I'm struck by how easy it is for Americans, then and now, to be so dismissive of heinous acts, how nationalistic racism so effortlessly allows far too many of us to support-let's be honest-war criminals. Is it reflexive patriotism? A misplaced sense of national guilt? Politics? Image
I think Ryan was right in asking us to reflect a bit more deeply, thoughtfully on our experiences in Afghanistan. And part of that is asking ourselves how we think about "honor" and "patriotism" when those who wear our nation's uniform commit egregious acts in times of war. Image
The key, I think, is that a military uniform should not be seen as an inviolable shield to protect those who don't deserve our admiration or sympathy. Perhaps Calley's prosecuting attorney put it best. "You did not strip him of his honor. What he did stripped him of his honor."
For #twitterstorians in the audience, many of the quotations here come from an excellent contemporary source. Tom Tiede, Calley: Soldier or Killer? (New York: Pinnacle Books, 1971).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gregory A. Daddis

Gregory A. Daddis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GregoryDaddis

Sep 8, 2023
Hi @herandrews, Vietnam-era historian here. Thought I might continue the dialogue you began on @BethLynnBailey's really fantastic book, #anarmyafire.

First, I appreciate that you are writing for your audience. They're attuned to be angry at the "libs."

theamericanconservative.com/racial-trouble…
We live in a hyper-politicized moment. I get it. But you're politicizing the review & distorting the author's argument. In no way does Bailey discuss the army as a tool for social control. That's you, not her. I talk about "bias" w/ students & your review is a classic example.
As @joestieb notes, Bailey qualifies constantly, as all good historians do. In no way, does she "spin" her evidence to make her argument more attractive. She's an award-winning historian, a respected member of the military history community. She doesn't "spin." Again, that's you.
Read 12 tweets
Jan 31, 2022
🧵Reading @ThePlumLineGS's WaPo piece today on a proposed New Hampshire ban on teaching “negative” accounts of US history, I'm struck by the parallels to the early 1950s Red Scare. This article from the November 1951 issue of The American Legion is strikingly similar.
The article, targeting parents, speaks of professors who are "easily buffaloed by the communists with the cry of 'academic freedom.'" Pro-communist teachers are the "most fruitful sources of recruitment" and, thus, parents must take stock & "the lead" of educational institutions.
Because of professors who are "aiding Stalin...in their infiltration of schools," a "cleaning-up is in order." The article cries that "we have every right to defend our young people from those who would poison their minds in behalf of the Soviet dictatorship."
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(