This piece is excellent. It historically situates the movement as a workers movement, recognizing internal contradictions, and counters the framework of both apologists for the repression & liberal cheerleaders of the student movement on how we should understand the consequences
Pulling out sections I especially feel are worth highlighting: “In an incredible display o...
“The workers of Tiananmen a...“The battle between the Chi...
This one is less centrally important to Tiananmen but it highlights the contradictions in the tendency within the socialist movement which has substituted workers control for party domination

Been told I need to read state and rev, when I did this quote jumped the fuck out to me “As David Graeber pointed o...“Lenin’s idealized form of ...
“In time, various socialist...
This is an incredibly conscise summary of what is really the main contradiction within the workers movement: “Unfortunately for the Leni...“Ideologically, this manife...“These two beliefs in and o...“For the Leninists and soci...
“The persistence of these r...“This took a number of form...“Worst of all, the mobility...
Important framing of the class nature of the cultural revolution and its repression: “The most significant impac...
What I take from this is that one need not be an anarchist to assert the necessity of workers control and autonomy for workers. Dispossession, alienation, and disempowerment produce their own dissenters and assert those necessities. “One worker interviewed by ...“This is an extremely conse...
First they kill the workers then they kill their ideas, as such they die two deaths. The counter revolution continues every time they are socially killed again. “This was as pure a workers...
On Tiananmen as the transition between different forms of workers struggle, the shift in the site of social struggle from the factory to the street, and the challenges that emerge from this particularly in the lack of ability to assert collective power. ImageImageImage
There are no easy answers for this as the article suggests this struggle and others like it were in a sense a response to the reorganization of the world economy to make such struggles impossible (we cannot go back) but there are glimmers of hope to be found.
There are examples like autogestion in Argentina of workers democracy asserted after this but unlike Tiananmen Hungary, Spain, Italy, Russia as mentioned these have been largely filling gaps left by capitalist reshuffling not a direct challenge to capitalist production writ large
The ability to assert collective power as workers or in resistance to capital seems to be shifting from the point of production to crucial nodes along the supply chain. They can now easily move a factory whose workers strike but they cannot as easily change global geography.
The port blockades against Israeli ships, the barricades of Canadian railroads in solidarity with Unistʼotʼen Camp, the blocking of the pipeline itself, even that accidental blocking of the Suez show what might be an alternative.
Missed the alt text for these but don’t want to break the thread so here they are if you need them: “What then, was Tiananmen? ...“The fact remained, however...“Contemporary revolts thus ...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with for the self abolition of the proletariat

for the self abolition of the proletariat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @thecoleslaws

9 Jun
Y’all should read this again, you are reading what you want to see into it. He says explicitly “that primitive communism... furnishes the finest and broadest basis of exploitation and despotism there, as well as in India and Russia” he framed that as worse than the colonization.
This is very explicitly celebrating colonialism as progress “in the conditions of modern society it turns out to be a crying anachronism (which has either to be removed or almost made to retrograde) as much as were the independent mark communities of the original cantons.”
It might be helpful to show what Marx and Engles general understanding of imperialism was at this time (and Engles never changed this). It was that it was something of a necessary evil whose brutality paled in comparison to the progress it made through stagist history.
Read 8 tweets
8 Jun
borders only exist as violence
the border is the crisis.
there is no migrant crisis there are crises that produce mass migration, the border produces another.
Read 4 tweets
7 Jun
The supply line blockade is a potential way to reestablish the power of the classic workers movement under conditions of neoliberal globalization of production in which a factory can simply be moved elsewhere if its workers become too militant.
This tactic allows for contemporary street movements to approach the power of the general strike and directly challenge the profits of capital in a way that occupying squares does not.
Maintaining supply lines is essential to the functioning of contemporary capital (and for counter revolutionary economic reorganization). But supply lines have weak points and choke points both of which can be targeted to great effect.
Read 5 tweets
7 Jun
On the US-China Cold War line:

The US and Chinese competition is an inter-imperialist rivalry, the Cold War was also an inter-imperialist rivalry over so in that sense it has an element of truth but I don’t think that’s what most people mean when they say that.
I think most who talk about that on the left especially against any acknowledgement of Chinese capitalism/imperialism, are trying to appeal to anti-Americanism. But materialism here demands a bit more than that in a one dimensional US bad China good way. Both are worse.
For one the Cold War actually had much less integrated ruling classes, economies, and spheres of production and distribution than exists now between US and China this trend seems likely to continue with Chinese firms now even opening factories in the US.
Read 8 tweets
7 Jun
This nonsense is a great example of why decolonization cannot be a state process imposed from above but must be a movement of by and for the colonized masses. As Sandino said “only the workers and peasants go all the way to the end”
Read 4 tweets
6 Jun
Almost like for some of these people critiquing the democrats isn’t actually about principles (they have none) but a marketing strategy/brand for their grifts
I am skeptical of Medicare for all as a socialist proposal because Medicare really sucks to be on and the state controlling shit doesn’t actually mean workers and communities reliant on it do, but not having to pay out the ass for basic healthcare would be nice.
fully decommodifying healthcare would be better.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(