Back in Feb, I published a @washingtonpost op-ed about the disgraceful legal threats and smears ES&S - the voting machine monopolist - had thrown at SMART, NY activists who lobby for election security and against unaccountable voting machines.
For years, orgs like SMART argued that the defect-riddled machines from the likes of ES&S were a threat to US election integrity, not just because they were hackable, but because this made it easy for push a bad-faith narrative of a stolen election.
Of course, this is exactly what happened, with Trump and his cult taking up a baseless narrative that Dominion Systems' (terrible) voting machines had been used to steal the election. Far from being chastened by this democracy-destabilizing moment, ES&S seized upon it.
3/
ES&S lumped SMART's accurate, measured warnings about its flagship Expressvote XL machines in with Trump's unhinged claims about Dominon's machines, hoping that the general public wouldn't know enough about the specifics to tell the difference.
That is, ES&S was tacitly colluding with Trump to making voting machines a culture war bullshit topic, turning the years of selfless, well-informed, highly technical scholarship on the dangers of voting machines into a marker of unhinged conspiratorialism.
5/
Despite legal threats from a vicious monopolist, SMART didn't give up. Their bravery is paying off. The NY Senate will take up SB309A, a voting machine bill to ban "hybrid" machines that mark and count ballots, among other election integrity measures.
The bill also prohibits counting non-human-readable ballot marks like QR codes and bar codes insisting that any automated ballot tally count up the same marks that a human recount would rely upon.
7/
SB309A mirrors the language of federal laws like the SAFE Act and PAVE Act, which were struck down after massive, coordinated lobbying campaigns by the voting machine industry.
8/
And SB309A has the support of the nation's foremost election security experts, led by Princeton's Andrew Appel.
Despite what Trump and voting machine profiteers would have you believe, election integrity is not conspiratorial culture war bullshit. Between Bush v Gore and 2020, we ignored the warnings of security researchers - and now we're paying the price.
10/
Passing SB309A would mark a turning point for sound, evidence-based election security, and make New York State the leader in sound elections.
eof/
ETA - If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
2003's PRISONERS INVENTIONS is an underground classic, a high-stakes precursor to MAKE Magazine, combining ingenuity, adversarial interoperability, and user-centered design. After 13 years out of print, @halfletter's published a new, expanded edition.
If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
Prisoners' Inventions was created by Angelo, a pseudonymous, long-serving incarcerated American who entered into a collaboration with the Temporary Services collective, who both published Angelo's work and staged multiple gallery showings of his work.
It's (mostly) great that Big Tech monopolies are FINALLY facing regulation.
There are two bad things about monopolies:
I. They cheat their customers and suppliers because they know they're the only game in town, and
II. They use their money to legalize harmful practices.
1/
Here's a Type I example of how Google uses its monopoly power to cheat: Google controls the ad-tech market they rig it in their favor - they represent both buyers and sellers, and they compete with them, and they advantage themselves.
But Google's ad-tech stack also has a Type II monopoly abuse: the ad-targeting systems Google sells are extraordinarily, harmfully invasive. They get away with this privacy abuse because they convert the money they get from rigging the market to lobby against privacy laws.
3/
Today, @propublica published the first in a series of blockbuster analyses of leaked tax data from America's richest billionaires - some of whom have lobbies for higher taxes on the rich! - showing that the true tax rate for billionaires is 3.4%.
These records - which include tax data for Elon Musk, Warren Buffett, Jeff Bezos, Michael Bloomberg, George Soros, Carl Icahn and others - reveal that it's not just sneering boasters like Trump and Helmsley who avoid the tax the rest of us pay - it's the whole cohort.
3/
While #DigitalFeudalism is practiced by many Big Tech companies, Apple pioneered it and is its standard-bearer. The company rightly points out that the world is full of bandits who will steal your data and money and ruin your life, and it holds itself out as your protector.
1/
Apple is a warlord whose fortress has thick walls and battlements bristling with the most ferocious infosec mercs money can buy.
Surrender your autonomy by moving to Apple's fortress - where they choose your which apps and where you get repairs - and they'll defend you.
2/
This arrangement (which should really be called "digital manorialism" because feudalism involved providing men-at-arms to the monarch) has the same problem as all benevolent dictatorships: it works well, but fails badly.