I think it's weird that "freedom" has gone from meaning something like, "the capacity to make choices" to "the ability to take on risk without responsibility."
"Freedom" has become as a kind of branding or aesthetic, rather than a means of achieving goals. One is "free" not when one makes hard, sometimes painful choices to achieve something of value, but when one ignores consequence in favor of a kind of naïve hedonism.
It's the "freedom" of the child, rather than the freedom that just about every group of people throughout history have struggled to win for themselves. It's all very strange.
I honestly think it's dangerous to treat "freedom" as theology rather than as a measure of capacity, and I think that at least some of the weird cultural dross we've had to deal with over the last decade or so is the result of this sort of thinking.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
