"Nature and The Lancet played important roles in enabling, encouraging, and enforcing the false narrative that science evidence indicates Sars-CoV-2 had a natural-spillover origin points and the false narrative that this was the scientific consensus.”
unherd.com/2021/06/beijin…
unherd.com/2021/06/beijin…
"The science establishment colluded to dismiss the lab leak hypothesis as a conspiracy theory, assisted by prominent experts with clear conflicts of interest, patsy politicians and a pathetic media that mostly failed to do its job."
"[A]t the heart of this scandal lie some of the world’s most influential science journals. These..have played a central role in shutting down discussion and discrediting alternative views on the origins, with disastrous consequences for our understanding of events."
Shocking to see Wellcome Trust Director Farrar quoted describing a discredited op-ed with no scientific data and risibly pseudoscientific analysis as "the most important research on the genomic epidemiology of the origins of this virus." Is Farrar a fool? Or a liar? Or both?
(The Fauci email trove made it clear Farrar was a participant in the telecon Fauci organized to shape and coordinate the false narrative to be sold to the press and the public...but I had not realized until now that Farrar was cut from the same cloth as Fauci.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
