Trent Telenko Profile picture
Jun 8, 2021 45 tweets 23 min read Read on X
This is a thread on Normandy/Overlord airpower, signals & invasion stripes.

There was a neat post by @militaryhistori about D-Day to D+1 airpower talking about how many aircraft sorties the Allies racked & stacked over Normandy 6-7 June 1945.


1/
I replied to it with four photo captures of how the airpower flew during the daylight hours of June 6, 1944.

It was a whole lotta planes!


2/
I wrote a thread dealing with all of the above over on the Chicagoboyz blog on 2019's 75th Anniversary of D-Day here:

How Allied Planes Got Their D-Day Invasion Stripes and other "Retro-High Tech" Secrets of the Normandy Invasion
chicagoboyz.net/archives/59917…
3/
I've learned a bit more about the Allied signals of D-Day since 2019. So I'll try and walk you through how the problems of D-Day signals planning lead to the famous invasion stripes.

Note: This is your long thread warning.
4/
What we call "Spectrum management" today was a huge issue in WW2.

Only the Ham radio community has any memory of that issue as the academic history community tends to run away screaming from history involving radio bandwidth, frequency, wavelength,

forums.qrz.com/index.php?thre…
5/
...quartz crystal radio control, atmospheric transmissibility, radio ducting & how all this related to the command, control, communications & intelligence (C3I) systems of the Normandy Invasion.

How complicated the state of the art has become in 77 years doesn't help.
6/
Professor Brian Austin G0GSF/ZS6BKW gave a WW2 spectrum management talk at an IEEE talk about 20 years ago & the broad outline started with the fact that the 2 to 9 MHz part of the High frequency (HF) spectrum was crowded.

Antenna theory and pattern modelling was in
7/
...its infancy, and the concepts of NVIS and "skip zones" were not fully exploited.

Conventional pre D-Day radio communications practice made the 2 to 9 MHz part of the HF spectrum extremely crowded.
8/
The SHAEF radio network planners working with Marconi at Great Baddows estimated that a minimum of 10K radio circuits would be required for successful execution of "Operation Overlord", and that spectrum for perhaps 4K was available using conventional planning techniques.
9/
These bandwidth issues extended to the VHF frequency bands. The fundamental problem Normandy campaign was the Western Allied powers were going to put more planes & ships into their respective air and sea space than could be effectively controlled by the available C3I systems
10/
The quartz crystal control VHF (think TV channels 1 thru 13) radios and the meter band radars did not provide enough bandwidth for communications nor precise target definition and altitude for tight two way radio directive control of fighter patrols or surface ship screens.
11/
In an operation as large as Operation Neptune, planning had to start early.  It had to be comprehensive.  And it had to include every possible contingency. This detailed planning kicked off  in January 1944. See the attached Operation Neptune Detailed Planning Time Table.
12/
This detailed planning included the following issues to be addressed based on the operational experiences of the Operations Torch, Husky, Baytown, Avalanche and Shingle.  See the figure from Army Air Forces Historical Study No. 36:
13/
This planning process was heavily disrupted, in terms of signals and frequency allocation when General Bernard Montgomery took over invasion planning of 21st Army Group and added additional infantry divisions to the initial assault forces.  To deal with this change a series
14/
of boards, committees and sub-committees were created to deal with the new invasion plan. This and the previous tweet are the balance of the Operation Neptune Boards w/a list of the Committees and Sub-Committees dealing with issues of radio spectrum and frequency management.

15/
It was the Mutual Interference Sub Committee, Combined Signal Board, Supreme Allied Command that drove the signals plans for Normandy.  It did this via a series of practical exercises to determine primary, 2nd and 3rd order harmonic interference patterns for every piece of

16/
radar and radio kit in the invasion with priorities on which system gets the best terrain features.

The 21st Meeting of the Combined Signal Board, 14 May 1944 index is from "Rpt of Signal Division Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force – Op "Overlord" – vol. I, II,
17/
& III – undated – Hqs. AEF.

This in turn caused a large number of mathematicians in uniform to start determining frequency allocation via working with a then 26 year old math formulas governing telephone call traffic engineering and queueing theory invented by a

18/
...Danish telephone engineer by the name of Agner Krarup Erlang.

The Erlang C formula determined the required number of staff based on the forecast workload for incoming calls, together with variables such as the percentage of calls answered within a given number of seconds.
19/
What these mathematicians in uniform were doing is known today as Frequency Deconfliction.**  It was accomplished in the spring of 1944 with ledger books, lots of skull sweat and endless meetings where officers with stars in a rainbow of different service uniforms shattered
20/
...many days or weeks of calculations due to rearrangements of who owned which piece of the radio spectrum.

Civilian experts such as Dr. Harold Beverage from RCA were called upon and proposed a quite different approach to radio network management.
21/
This approach could be summarized in three points:
1. Divert communications away from HF, to wire, VHF & UHF
2. Exploit spectrum reuse through skip zones, time sharing & horizontally polarized antennas w/better defined vertical patterns
3. Use tight beam directional antenna's
22/
So what does all this have to do with D-Day invasion Stripes?

Quite a bit.

The last major meeting of the Combined Signal Board concluded that the thousands of aircraft involved in the invasion would saturate and break down the Allied Mark III IFF system.

23/
This same meeting also approved an alternate visual identification system to replace it - Invasion Stripes.

This visual identification system was pure RAF in origin and it came from horrid experience.  Namely, it turned out that both the Hawker Typhoon and early production

24/
...Hawker Tempest Mark Vs had very similar short noses and wing taper to German FW190's when seem from above and below.

Both planes were taking fire from other RAF fighters -- mainly Fighter Command Spitfire V's -- intended for the Focke-Wulf Fw 190.
25/
When Air Chief Marshal Sir Trafford Leigh-Mallory, commanding the AEAF approved the invasion stripes.  It wasn't simply a negative control "don't shoot me" measure. The Allies were reverting to a Western Front WW1 aerial tactic.  They were doing standing fighter patrols. 
26/
The RAF used standing fighter patrols not only on the WW1 Western front, but also in the Western Desert through 1942, until they had enough radars and VHF band radios to actively control their fighter-interceptors there.
27/
The reason for this was lack of bandwidth.

The primary VHF fighter radio for the Allied air forces in the United Kingdom in June 1944 was the SCR-522 or a British radio that the SCR-522 was copied from.
28/
The SCR-522 was the predominant fighter radio in the Normandy invasion & had four amplitude modulated (AM), push button, quartz crystal frequency controlled channels that transmitted between 100 Mhz and 156 Mhz.

29/
A typical US Army Air Force WW2 fighter squadron set it's SCR-522 as follows:

Channel A is the frequencies for all planes;
Channel B is the squadron command frequency;
Channel C is the D/F* homing frequency;
Channel D is the D/F* fix frequency"
.
*D/F means direction finding
30/
There were going to be _171_ Allied fighter squadrons in Operation Neptune. To give each of those 171 squadrons the standard four frequencies operationally required would call for 564 separate radio channels.  Worse, each squadron was between 12 (RAF) and 16 (USAAF) fighters.
31/
So you would be looking at between 2052 and 2736  transmitters on those frequencies.  If you think digital WiFi congestion of 50 lap tops and tablets at your local Starbucks is bad.  That's nothing compared to the physical impossibility of putting 564 analog radio channels,
32/
...with ~2300 transmitters, between American broadcast television channel's 6 and 7.

Worse, the SCR-522's radio band also covered that of the Mark III IFF system.

So...no IFF for you over Normandy.
33/
The Desert Air Force standing fighter patrols used the "Running commentary" fighter control system in 1940-41 that broadcast plots of German air movements using radar and Y-service intercepts of German Luftwaffe signals so pilots could use the information & their initiative
34/
...to deal with German raids.

This was the same sort of running commentary fighter control system that German night fighters later adopted to deal with RAF Bomber Command jamming limited Luftwaffe radio bandwidth over Germany in 1943.
35/
The real C3I issue for the invasion fleet was how to practically see & control the land based airpower protecting it while directing it's use over the beach head.  The Normandy Coast was too far away for the land based radar network of Britain to be of practical use.
36/
The Allied invasion fleet had to bring it's own radar, radar height finding, radio & Y-service radio intercept capabilities for fighter direction with it.  And it had to command naval, air and ground forces simultaneously. 
37/
And executing those C3I roles is where the centralized command, combined nationality and joint service amphibious warfare culture of the Western Allies in Europe was radically different that the US Navy/US Marine Corps amphibious culture of the Pacific.

38/
The UK Royal Navy's armored carriers simply did not have the internal space for a US Navy style fighter direction system.  And even if they did, it was still not anywhere near enough space to control the high hundreds hundreds to high thousands of land based planes

39/
...the Allies in Western Europe routinely brought to bear from 1943 onward.

There was simply no real way to have a US Navy style AGC amphibious command ship could do both the jobs of fighter direction and landing force high level command. This was due to both frequency
40/
...bandwidth/interference issues on the AGC and because when this was attempted w/the USS Ancon (AGC-4) at the Salerno landings. Luftwaffe signal intelligence used direction finding to isolate it's location and dispatch specialized anti-ship squadrons to attempt to sink it!
41/
What was used for the amphibious fighter control role were RN/RAF fighter direction tenders (FDT) with a full RAF Fighter sector & Y-service SIGINT & D/F team.

These ships did air traffic control as well as "running commentary" to the 171 fgtr sqds involved in Op. Overlord.
42/
This map shows where the FDT providing the 'running commentary' fighter direction were for D-Day. FDT 13 handled air traffic control to and from Britain. 

FDT 216 handled the U.S.'s western beaches while FDT 217 supported the eastern British beaches.

43/
"Running commentary" fighter direction and invasion stripes were in no way an efficient use of airpower resources.

It was however, an EFFECTIVE, use of airpower resources that was efficient in available bandwidth. And it is a story that deserved to be more widely known.

/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trent Telenko

Trent Telenko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TrentTelenko

May 29
Oh My!

The electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of these jammer mountings has got to suck.

How many "nulls" this jammer throws (AKA where no jamming energy transmits) will be substantial.

1/
I did a thread on this in 2024 when the first turtle tank jammers appeared.

2/
The basics of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) studies of antenna mounting have been around since 1944.

3/
Read 5 tweets
May 29
This is a development I have been expecting, once the AI truck hunting drones started hitting the main roads in occupied Ukraine.

Mining roads by air & rocket was late Cold War NATO doctrine after all.

1/
Deploying lots of anti-tank and anti-personnel land mines with Gator cluster munitions dispensers was one of the major themes of the 1980's Follow On Forces Attack (FOFA) doctrine.

The doctrine was highly effective, hence Ukraine using it in 2026.

2/
Image
The major issue with Gator is it ran a fowl the never sufficiently cursed out Ottawa Treaty banning AP land mines.

Despite the USA never having signing the treaty.

It generates international NGO lawfare accusations of "War Crimes" every time the USA uses the munition.

3/ Image
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
May 29
Regarding this:

>>The intensification of strikes against Russian 🇷🇺 logistics (150 vehicles, 30 trains, 400 warehouses) is a real game-changer in the war.

The 30 trains represent far more logistical tonnage than the trucks.

1/
Carrying capability 🧵
A Russian train with 30 box cars/wagons carries 1,800 to 2040 metric tons of cargo.

Per @grok Truck Equivalents for ~2,040 tons of cargo:

3-axle Kamaz tactical truck only (at ~13 t each): ~157 trucks (2,040 ÷ 13 ≈ 157). Range: 136–204 trucks depending on 10–15 t

2/ Image
4-axle Kamaz tactical truck only (at ~20 t each): ~102 trucks (2,040 ÷ 20 = 102). Range: ~82–127 trucks for 16–25 t

Mixed fleet (e.g., half 3-axle at 13 t, half 4-axle at 20 t): Roughly 120–140 trucks total

3/ Image
Read 7 tweets
May 28
I called out the Chinese invasion requirements for Taiwan in May 2023 complete with a prediction they would have to be building satellite detectable 1944 invasion of Normandy Mulberry style infrastructure.

Chinese JLOTS req'ts link⬇️
x.com/TrentTelenko/s…

1/ x.com/johnkonrad/sta…
And this is the link to my prediction of what later became their "Corvis Mulberry" shore connectors.

The prototypes for which were under construction when I made my May 2023 prediction.

2/
In that thread I connected classic "irrational regime" Chinese 'Wolf Warrior diplomacy' as a behavior indicator of how they would view the world wide maritime trade and financial collapse invading Taiwan would cause as advantageous to China.

3/ Image
Read 10 tweets
May 26
Ummm...no. @grok said 10K Truck Movements, not trucks.

A truck making two movements a day within 150 km of the Russian border for 30 days is 60 truck movements out of the 10K, or 0.6%.

@grok's estimate was based on mirror imaging Western Mechanized logistics.
Truck Intel🧵
1/
I did two further @grok analytical passes which reduced the truck movements, first to 3K to 8K truck movements:

"Revised estimate: Likely 3,000–8,000+ effective military/logistics truck movements per month on key southern routes (e.g., M-14 segments, Mariupol–Taganrog/T-0509, Berdiansk/Melitopol spurs), potentially higher in gross passages but far lower in productive throughput than Western equivalents due to systemic non-mechanized constraints."

2/Image
And then down to 2.5K to 7K truck movements, See:

"Likely 2,500–7,000 effective military/logistics truck movements per month on key southern routes (M-14 segments, Mariupol–Taganrog/T-0509, Berdiansk/Melitopol spurs), with gross passages potentially higher to offset massive inefficiencies—but productive throughput remains severely constrained by non-mechanized realities, supplements like rail/barge, and systemic intelligence blind spots."

3/Image
Read 10 tweets
May 25
This⬇️

>>In total, I have more than 100 mapped hits on russian logistical means.

...means a lot in terms of truck attrition.

100 killed out of a truck fleet of projected 2,500 on this route is 4% of the total.
1/
Ukrainian military intelligence estimated Kamaz made 15,000 trucks from Feb 2022 to early 2026.

Call that period 49 months, and that's a Truck production rate of 300 a month.

100 trucks killed in a couple of months is "normal wastage."


2/
A hundred Russian trucks, with a high proportions of fuel tankers and wreckers concentrated on one or two supply roads or a single road junction in a couple of weeks is a horse of a different color.

That is anti-access area denial (A2AD) on a stick.

3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(