I am not sure there is quite as much distance between "tear-gassed protesters for a photo op" and "took advantage of scheduled tear-gassing of protesters for a photo op" as some people seem to claim there is.
Also I am *intensely* curious what this redacted "request" made by what is likely a WH or Secret Service official!
The report amounts to an exoneration of the Park Police for the specific action of "clearing protesters for the president's photo op" and essentially nothing more. Fine, that's in the report's title! Pretty weird to claim it has anything to do with the other actors involved!
There is a plausible timeline where the WH learns protesters would be cleared that afternoon/evening, tries to get the USPP to speed that up (including with an unexplained "early deployment" by the Secret Service), and then Trump jumps across the street when it was cleared.
The alternative, and the full-on "exoneration" and "media failure" version of this, is that it was, what, a complete and utter coincidence?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So I went to another lake that the Los Angeles aqueduct dried up 100 years ago, and eventually turned into the *single largest source of dust pollution in the United States,* to find out what might be coming.
The day I visited, the air at Owens Lake was pristine. 20 years ago or so, there were days when the PM10 pollution level was more than 130 TIMES the federal limit. I asked Phill Kiddoo, the region's pollution control officer, what that would do to a person:
"Instant death."
The thing about the Great Salt Lake is that it is bigger than Owens Lake. Much, much bigger.
And it is rapidly drying up, and already becoming a dust source. 2.5 million people live next door.
"Where demand for water exceeds water supply are places where we see more likelihood of violence associated with water.... I do believe that climate change is going to make this problem worse." -- @PeterGleick
In recent years, in particular in Yemen, there have been a number of attacks on water infrastructure that almost certainly violate the 1977 protocols of the Geneva Conventions.
Draft of the 5th US National Climate Assessment, now open for comment:
"While US greenhouse gas emissions are decreasing, the current rate of decline is not sufficient to meet current national and international commitments designed to avoid the worst harms from climate change."
"US emissions remain substantial and would have to decline by more than 6% per year on average to meet current national goals of reaching net-zero emissions around 2050."
"...multiple climate hazards and cascading climate impacts are disrupting essential societal systems in every part of the country."
Me from last month re cascading/compounding climate impacts: