So I finally got around to reading the Yashar piece (not even going to do a 'Y*shar' since the last time I tried that, he found/screenshotted it in less than 10 min) & my recommendation is, if you were hesitating, definitely read it. It's really good. lamag.com/mag-features/y…
I thought of Yashar as some sort of irritating, rich fail-son, who was a massive celebrity clout chaser that would just shamelessly seek attention (much of which was just blatant bait like, 'omg anyone who likes avocado is just wrong.' & 'The Beatles are so basic. Don't @ me.')
(And btw I believed he was the rich, fail-son of some wealthy Iranian family, because he led everyone to believe that. In reality, his parents both work(ed) at the Univ. of Illinois, which tbh is much cooler but I guess didn't fit the 'image' he was going for.)
Now after reading the piece, it's pretty clear that he's less of a benign clout chaser & much more malevolent. Part that fake German socialite Anna Sorokan, part Shaun King & a dash of Glenn Greenwald. He appears to be a serial manipulator, fraud and kind of a fabulist.
Rather than a wealthy trust-fund 'socialite', he seems to be a broke guy who doesn't have a real job or any income but just uses his connections to emotionally manipulate people out of money.
And again...
Just keeping a normal excel spreadsheet of all my celebrity friends, including their personal contacts, that I will produce at a moments notice to prove how important I am.
He squatted in Kathy Griffin's house until Joan Walsh helped her work up the courage to kick him out lol
Real Shaun King vibes.
A lot of his 'reporting' has clear conflicts (b/c he has no editor) and seems to be thinly veiled 'defend my friends/go after my enemies'. Never trust someone, much less a journalist, who thinks they've "never gotten anything wrong.
Also, he's extremely vindictive, to the point where people didn't want to go on the record with their thoughts on him (which was how GG was treated by most, up until a couple years ago).
Extremely weirdly, no one can actually recall how they became friends with him?
I'll just end it with this. Nothing else to add but LOL.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yes, it was incredibly meek and buried at the end of the tweet but he did it! It took a year and a half but it seems like has finally noticed that Trump is a demented old man (kind of).
The issue with Fetterman v Lamb was not an issue of 'progressive' ideology, it was a matter of ignoring numerous red flags that he was a very 'off' person not suited for congress, mainly b/c people fell in love with his aesthetic
One of the first major "red flags" about Fetterman that I called out years ago was his behavior wrt to the jogger incident.
He did something that was so self-evidently wrong but rather than apologize or take accountability, just pushed through & refused to admit to being wrong.
It should have been really easy to do, but he wouldn't do it.
Pretty obvious parallels to Platner's defense of the Nazi tattoo (a clear, insult-to-your intelligence lie) & his defense of his reddit posts ('i was an angry troop').
Anyway, this is all going to go fine. For sure!
The Left desperately wants to pretend they were all completely duped by him and he suddenly changed after the stroke, but the truth is that there were numerous red flags that were there if you wanted to see them. But his aesthetic!!
Would just like to note that back in Oct I pointedly asked @jonfavs what the Pod Bros relationship w/ Platner campaign was and he gave me a whole big, indignant," How DARE you, sir!" response.
And now, faced with another Nazi 'controversy' they rush out another softball intvw.
It strained credulity to believe that there was no actual relationship and 'just wanting to keep an open mind.' Now, it's just completely obvious that John was just straight up lying about it.
I mean, it was obvious then too, but now it's just comically obvious.
Yesterday Trump said, 'he didn't know what body part his MRI was, but NOT the brain'. Today Trump struggled to stay awake repeatedly during a cabinet meeting.
Naturally, Nate's last 14 political tweets are about BIDEN OLD (12 of which are about Neera Tanden).
That's dedication!
And yet ANOTHER long ass, whiny 'article' about Biden Old and how right he was. Nothing else going on. Nothing about pardons. Nothing about presidential age/cognitive abilities. Nothing. Just that pure 100% uncut Biden Old.
Never say that Nate doesn't have hobbies.
I was going to post snippets from the article but honestly it's just too pathetic. It's literally the same shit he has posted, i don't know....100 times?
Given Nate's total silence now, I can only assume that he thinks this is all normal and acceptable (way more normal than having a well-planned cabinet meeting). Nothing authoritarian going on now!
These guys all used to react to every single utterance. Every single flub. Every anonymous background quote Politico article. And now...all of them are just completely silent.