Future Substack posts may discuss Mare of Easttown, Shtisel, and maybe an interview with the author of "Mom Genes," which I am once again asking you to buy: amazon.com/Mom-Genes-Scie…
If you subscribe you are guaranteed occasional content at least through the release of my next book, so don't hesitate. douthat.substack.com
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Actually I'm not sure if this is definitely saying that "Lost" shouldn't have been approached as a puzzle box instead of simply being "felt"; maybe the author just means that its deliberate puzzle-box design helped encourage the puzzle-box mentality:
But either way, if you analyze Raiders of the Lost Ark as a puzzle box you are being a philistine, but if you commit to a TV show that was *designed as a puzzle box*, you are within your rights to be angry when it doesn't have a solution to its puzzles.
My wife's terrific new book is out today. I am on social media, she wisely is not. Therefore in the style of a Bernie Sanders meme I am once again here asking you to buy it: amazon.com/Mom-Genes-Scie…
If you need more inducement here is a positive review from someone who is not me: wsj.com/articles/mom-g…
Short take on the Snyder Cut (longer take in the next NR): The new Justice League is effective on its own terms, but those terms are a step back from what Snyder was trying to do in Man of Steel (where it mostly worked) and Batman v. Superman (where it completely didn't).
For all the four-hour-ness and not-Marvel-ness, Justice League is much more of a conventional superhero movie than its predecessors, which were more interested in the terror and havoc Superman's arrival wreaked on *us*.
The setup in Batman v. Superman, especially - how do our leaders, our weirdos, our normies, our merely human heroes all relate to a demi-god - was genuinely original. Unfortunately the plotting was just terrible. And no less terrible in the director's cut, alas.