New Substack: Decadence and Andreessen's Dilemma:
douthat.substack.com/p/decadence-an…
Previous Substack: Influential Intellectuals Revisited:
douthat.substack.com/p/influential-…
Future Substack posts may discuss Mare of Easttown, Shtisel, and maybe an interview with the author of "Mom Genes," which I am once again asking you to buy:
amazon.com/Mom-Genes-Scie…
If you subscribe you are guaranteed occasional content at least through the release of my next book, so don't hesitate.
douthat.substack.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ross Douthat

Ross Douthat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DouthatNYT

8 Jun
This is a good piece except for the passing attempt to rehabilitate "Lost":
collider.com/indiana-jones-…
Actually I'm not sure if this is definitely saying that "Lost" shouldn't have been approached as a puzzle box instead of simply being "felt"; maybe the author just means that its deliberate puzzle-box design helped encourage the puzzle-box mentality: Image
But either way, if you analyze Raiders of the Lost Ark as a puzzle box you are being a philistine, but if you commit to a TV show that was *designed as a puzzle box*, you are within your rights to be angry when it doesn't have a solution to its puzzles.
Read 4 tweets
8 Jun
My Tuesday column: Are We Destined For a Crisis of Democracy in 2024?:
nytimes.com/2021/06/08/opi…
It's a sequel, of sorts, to my Sunday column: Three Paths to Containing Trump:
nytimes.com/2021/06/05/opi…
Let's see if I can respond to these objections, 1 tweet for 1 tweet:
Read 14 tweets
12 May
The world is not disenchanted:
firstthings.com/article/2021/0…
Not disenchanted:
Not disenchanted:
Read 5 tweets
3 May
My wife and her new book in the latest Opinion newsletter:
static.nytimes.com/email-content/…
Her essay in Sunday's paper:
nytimes.com/2021/05/01/opi…
The book itself, with six shopping days till Mother's Day:
amazon.com/Mom-Genes-Scie…
Read 4 tweets
27 Apr
My wife's terrific new book is out today. I am on social media, she wisely is not. Therefore in the style of a Bernie Sanders meme I am once again here asking you to buy it:
amazon.com/Mom-Genes-Scie…
If you need more inducement here is a positive review from someone who is not me:
wsj.com/articles/mom-g…
Here is an excerpt/adaptation:
smithsonianmag.com/science-nature…
Read 6 tweets
29 Mar
Short take on the Snyder Cut (longer take in the next NR): The new Justice League is effective on its own terms, but those terms are a step back from what Snyder was trying to do in Man of Steel (where it mostly worked) and Batman v. Superman (where it completely didn't).
For all the four-hour-ness and not-Marvel-ness, Justice League is much more of a conventional superhero movie than its predecessors, which were more interested in the terror and havoc Superman's arrival wreaked on *us*.
The setup in Batman v. Superman, especially - how do our leaders, our weirdos, our normies, our merely human heroes all relate to a demi-god - was genuinely original. Unfortunately the plotting was just terrible. And no less terrible in the director's cut, alas.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(