But AG, who is far more thoughtful than most right wingers, insists that I'm just mad a Manchin for having "principles. I gave this some this some thought.
What are Manchin's "principles." He says bipartisanship. This requires him to ignore the GOP wave of new voting restrictions across the US. AG argues, like Liz Cheney, these are all appropriate though the justification for them all sound just like Trump's calls for January 6th.
The "principle" Manchin is actually defending is McConnell's perversion of the filibuster, a tradition that goes back to 2007 after the GOP was crushed at the polls.
A best Manchin is defending a perversion of the filibuster from the early 70s when the talking filibuster died.
To anyone who has followed the GOP's embrace of voting restrictions following Obama's first win, what's going on is pretty clear.
Making it hard to vote wasn't good enough the GOP to hold power. Now they're focused on using their state power to void results they don't like.
Trump made it pretty clear that this is what he wanted in 2020 and the vast majority of the party is on board with that and probably won't accept anything else.
The result isn't just GOP rule -- they already have that in the courts and Senate.
The GOP's goal now that they're superpowered by Trump's shamelessness is the end of the second Reconstruction to enforce minority rule based almost exclusively on the support of older, white voters.
If you see that, and it isn't hard to see, Manchin's principles -- the preservation of a Senate where a minority that starts each election with a massive headstart gets a instant veto on everything that matters to the other vast majority of Americans -- deserve to be insulted.
But this leads us back to the beginning and the damn paradox we face.
Joe Manchin doesn't mind if we insult his principles. It may be what he's after!
So how do we save democracy while there's still a chance?
Luckily we have a president whose appeal is built in part on his professed ability to win over truculent Republicans. Manchin should be easy, right?
Of course, I screwed up the first tweet in this. Lesson: Never thread.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There's no good faith argument for slowing down the mail and gutting USPS' senior leadership in the middle of a pandemic and an election year.
Trump doesn't oppose vote by mail. He's voting that way from his fraudulent voting address. And encouraging other Republicans to do so.
USPS' economic and social value are undeniable and the only reason it isn't "profitable" is because Republicans created impossible pre-funding of pensions for 75 YEARS specifically to create the talking point that it isn't profitable.
This is a deliberate attempt to scare possible Democratic voters from voting by mail and to literally burn up their ballots by slowing down their delivery.
And if that doesn't work it's just a pretext for Trump and Barr to contest the election when that's not even a thing.
The idea that Mitt Romney was treated any worse than any other major party nominee is a Republican connivance to justify Trump. He wouldn’t even crack the top five for mistreated Democratic nominees in the last 30 years.
Mitt Romney ran for president on the premise that his health care plan was about to destroy America.
Romney accused Obama of sympathizing with the terrorists who committed the Benghazi attacks, one of the worst dog whistles of the pre-Trump era.
I'd like to remind you that the president of the United State has his charity shut down this month for a “shocking pattern of illegality."
And that's not even what he's being impeached for.
I'd like to remind you that we have no idea how many children the president of the United States illegally ordered to be kidnapped from their families nor how many of them still have not been returned.
And that's not even what he's being impeached for.
I'd like to remind you that the president of the United States asked his FBI Director to end an investigation into his National Security Advisor, who illegally worked as a foreign agent for another country.
And that's not even what he's being impeached for.
STYLE GUIDE: Calling David Koch is philanthropist is like calling Nero a violin player.
He gave away a fraction of the money that should have gone to taxes and the permanent damage he did to the planet and humanity. You don't focus on the soccer fields Pablo Escobar built for the neighborhood kids.
The Kochs funded a massive assault on the first black president under the guise of caring about the deficit. They then helped deliver the Senate to a white nationalist who exploded the deficit more than any previous president. Because it's a game to avoid taxes & pollute for free