Another day, another factually inaccurate critique of UC's use of diversity statements. A thread.

newdiscourses.com/2021/03/univer… via @NewDiscourses
The conflation begins early: while all faculty applicants at UC submit DEI statements, the general use of DEI statements is much different than the way they've been used in the Advancing Faculty Diversity Initiative searches, which are specially-funded, targeted & small-scale. Image
Even within the targeted AFD searches, the rubric these authors provide was not mandated or universally employed. I was on an AFD search committee @UCDavisLaw that did NOT use the rubric these authors are quoting from. At @ucdavis, I think only 3 hires were made using this rubric
It's true that in the limited searches THAT WERE FOCUSED ON DEI WORK, UCB cut a lot of people who didn't write good DEI statements. Similarly, when my school is hiring in IP, we cut a lot of people who do torts; we don't hire immigration restrictionists to run our asylum clinic. Image
Here's where these factual mistakes matter. Academic freedom means that teaching & research can only be judged by disciplinary experts in one's field. If rubrics are being imposed from above (as these authors mistakenly say), that's an academic freedom problem. If not, it's not. Image
Quick side point: @ucfreespeechctr does much more than the authors note. For example, it has also now sponsored four classes of Fellows, with a $25k budget for each, funding a broad array of research--including mine on DEI statements. This is all readily available on the website. Image
I have a different take here. UC should demand that all disciplines attend to diversity, equity, and inclusion, but allow that this will operate differently in different disciplines. This is fully consistent with academic freedom's focus on disciplinary expertise. Image
Finally, it is notable that a long essay about purported threats to academic freedom at the University of California makes no mention of any of the structures in place to protect academic freedom throughout the system, or any of the work done there on these very issues.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brian Soucek

Brian Soucek Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BRSoucek

2 Jun
Amazing here how the authors trot out all the usual misrepresentations about how UC actually uses DEI statements, then fail to note how UC already does EVERYTHING the authors suggest as better paths forward.
chronicle.com/article/how-to…
As usual, the authors fail to note that the 5 (not 8) searches at Berkeley that attracted 893 applicants in 2018 were specifically searching for faculty who had made strong DEI contributions. That was the job description, not some add on. This is not our general hiring procedure. Image
The authors fail to realize that Berkeley experiment was addressing the very problems the authors say they care about: institutional and journal prestige bias! Berkeley was showing what would happen if you don't use CVs to do the initial cut in a hiring search. ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
14 Apr
Big academic freedom news: Zoom has officially announced that it is handing off content moderation to universities for (almost) everything hosted on university Zoom accounts that is "related to the institution's academics or operations."

Policy here:
explore.zoom.us/docs/en-us/tru…
This is an issue UC's system-wide faculty Committee on Academic Freedom has been working on since late last year. The faculty released a statement a few months ago calling on Zoom to make a change like this: senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/reports…
Since then, I've been meeting with Zoom's lawyers, UC's lawyers, and law and tech people at several other schools to develop a policy that would get Zoom out of the business of deciding whether classes, talks, student events etc. comply with Zoom's standard terms of service.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(