I wonder who has been spinning my judgment? 🤨

Dozens of media outlets carry the same statement that "High Court Judge" Mr Justice Choudhury said my views "may well be profoundly offensive and even distressing"

.... but he doesn't say that in the judgment at all.
The closest thing he says is this, on page 55.
This is what he says about my beliefs on page 1
While it is often said that gender critical movement is well-funded etc, w shady powerful backers this is not true.

I am one woman who has been working as hard as i can over the past couple of days (with the help of
@LauraBerrillPR🙏) to get my case covered by the media
Whoever has been placing the phrase about "profoundly offensive and even distressing" views and downplaying "widely shared"

... into the media it doesn't appear to come from CGD's press release or from mine. cgdev.org/article/cgd-st…
So I wonder who has been spinning it?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maya Forstater

Maya Forstater Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MForstater

6 Jun
Hmm. I don't know how the govt will or can regulate legal Crowdfunders (since you can crowd fund for anything on generic sites, or set up your own).

And this is one of those illiberal moves not-to-applaud just because it is getting at someone you don't like
The ability of the public to bring JRs is important.

And there are permissions hearings and cost orders to deter the vexatious and frivolous.
I do think @CrowdJustice has been unwise to flex its own self-regulation for the Good Law Project.

Normally the rules require the "case owner" is the claimant and their lawyers sign off on the case page. But for GLP these constraints and quality control are removed.
Read 5 tweets
5 Jun
A reflection on leveling up over the past year..

There has been a lot of this (ordinary people finding ways to express their concern)
No movement here

These people would rather be irrelevant

Read 4 tweets
2 Jun
"Stonewall law"

The purpose of the Freedom of Information Act is to keep information about our relationship with public bodies that could cause reputational damage out of the public domain
The purpose of the Charities Act is to allow people to organise together for the public good.

We get to define what the public good is.

Disagreement with us is not in the public good
The purpose of the Equality Act 2010 is to support "our community".

The EHRC should not intervene to support other people's rights.

consortium.lgbt/ehrc-open-lett…
Read 4 tweets
2 Jun
Journalists... This Goliath sues David case is a story....

Time for a profile of Bev, Kate and Malcolm, the plucky upstarts

And for more on detransitioners, the story Mermaids doesn't want told
You can quote from Bev Jackson's excellent speech at @LabWomenDec Stonewall and co see as the kind of thing that should get you ousted from your job and from the public debate

labourwomensdeclaration.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
In the league of Orwellian documents the pleadings in this case (that no lawyer put their name to!) are right up there.

drive.google.com/file/d/12q_P2a…
Read 5 tweets
26 May
Stonewall's new range of clothing is "unisex"

(by which they mean designed for men, as if the needs and realities of being female don't matter)
Similarly their policies

"All LGBTQ+ couples and parents should have their relationships recognised on all official documents"

....sounds nice, right?

What does it mean?

In the case of surrogacy - that the "intended parents" should be recorded on the original birth certificate not the mother who carried the child.

Removing women's rights and commodifying their bodies
Read 6 tweets
24 May
Some thoughts on Stonewall's rebrand and strategy.

Erm.... does anyone else think that the rebrand is an 'up yours' to EHRC??
They went from LGB to LGBT in 2015 .... now adding "queer, questioning and ace" (asexual .... a spectrum which includes "demisexual", which means heterosexual who experiences sexual attraction based on emotional connection with a person...)
This is likely to mean that lesbian and gay men are a minority in the LGBTQ+ movement.

The government's LGBT survey (not a representative survey, but still interesting) suggests this is already the case amongst 16-24 year olds
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(