Again, public health is about the community, not individuals. Each one of us is a possible vector for a deadly disease that, if uncontrolled, has the capacity to destroy hospital systems. With highly transmissible new variants & ~50% vaccinated, masks are still necessary
This continues to be something people do not understand: one of the main goals is to prevent hospital collapse. That has always been the case. It's not like, "Oh, people choose to not get vaccinated, sucks for them." It will suck for the entire community
Another related goal is to stop transmission in order to mitigate mutations. So far, our vaccines are strong against the variants. That won't necessarily always be the case. And each new transmission creates a new opportunity for mutation.
So, yes, masks on airlines are still good as long as our vaccination rate stays where it is. Frankly, mask mandates probably shouldn't have been relaxed at all, given low rates of vaccination in several counties. Now we've got a new highly transmissible variant on our hands.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

13 Jun
I've been seeing commentary claiming Trump has been vindicated on Hydroxychloroquine (HQ). I was like, “what’s encouraging this new discourse?” Turns out it is this pre-print and, long story short: no, it does not vindicate Trump or “prove” anything about the effectiveness of HQ. Image
I’m not an expert in this field & I haven’t combed through this pre-print with a fine tooth comb. However, I can make a few general observations
-1 non-peer reviewed pre-print will never “prove” anything. Nor would a peer-reviewed study! All evidence has to be considered together
-This particular study was observational. Observational research is valuable, but it’s also messy, which makes it even more important to consider *all* the data. This study could be garbage or it could be elegant. But even if it's the latter, it would be far from the final word!
Read 10 tweets
12 Jun
There's a lot to debunk about supposed IQ differences between races. Consider a related scenario: the differential performance between men & women on math tasks. When women's attention is brought to gender gaps, they perform more poorly on tasks compared to controls Image
Again, there are several layers of bullshit when it comes to "race gaps in IQ." Stereotype threat is just one piece. And when is stereotype threat activated for Black students? At every level of education. "You're Black. You're different. You won't do as well."
When I worked in public schools, I had very young Black children tell me they weren't allowed to speak "their language" at school. This is just one example of a constant stereotypical monitoring of Black children than can have snowballing effects on performance
Read 5 tweets
12 Jun
I hope everyone is clear: the absolute earliest you can find out if you're pregnant is at 4 weeks. Even then, there are false negatives. So, in a state with a post-6 week ban, people have maximum 2 weeks to schedule an abortion. That's not gonna happen for a lot of people.
It's especially not going to happen for teenagers who are victims of rape or incest. You have to miss your period, be tracking your period, psychologically gather yourself, get access to a test, & then schedule an appointment. All w/in a 2 week period. You can't know sooner.
And, again, that 2 week period depends on that first test actually picking up enough HCG to register as positive. How many teens--or people more generally--understand that they could get a false negative?

Usually only people who are trying to get pregnant know this.
Read 10 tweets
11 Jun
You absolutely never have to hand it to the Red Army
Here's the thing w/ saying "The Soviets ended the Holocaust:" it implies some kind of intent, perhaps even a valorous one. Did the Soviets liberate many camps? Yes. Was their intent a humanitarian one, such that they cared about ending the Holocaust? No.
There's also the issue of this framing eliding all kinds of Soviet behavior/motivations during the earlier years of the war. There's the problem of Poland, for example. Also the issue of the Soviet Union initially supporting the German economy in a manner that empowered the Nazis
Read 6 tweets
10 Jun
It's honestly bizarre to see so many acting as if there is new evidence in favor of the lab-leak theory when, in fact, there is no new evidence. Three people being sick at the Wuhan institute in November, when the virus was already circulating, is not new evidence.
Maybe the virus did leak. If so, it was a naturally occurring virus under study (not a bioweapon). There are also arguments against this hypothesis, but it's not 100% impossible. Either way though, there is no new evidence in favor of it.
This is an example of journalists and pundits misunderstanding scientific evidence and blowing it up into a story. I don't care if you believe in the "lab leak" hypothesis, but it's ridiculous that this has become a heated debate when there is *no new evidence* either way
Read 4 tweets
10 Jun
This is a horrendous policy change from @UHC. In many health situations, patients are unable to know just how urgently they need care &/or have no other choice than to go to the ER. If UHC wants to improve preventative care, they should focus on incentives, not ER disincentives
My first thought was of people who experience extreme abdominal pain. This could be indicative of an ovarian cyst, which, if untreated, could lead to loss of an ovary &/or fallopian tube. This new policy could lead people to not seek urgent care in such cases
And how is a patient to know one way or another? How is the retroactive decision made by @UHC? If a person goes to the ER w/ abdominal pain & it IS an ovarian cyst, is that "urgent" enough? What if it turns out to not be a cyst, but the patient had no way of knowing?
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(