@IAmSciComm - On a Break! Profile picture
Jun 11, 2021 13 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Earlier, I shared my own little "blogger makes good" story about how the Better Posters blog became a book.

Pfft. 🥱 You want a REAL "blogger makes good" story?

@edyong209 won one of the @PulitzerPrizes today for #SciComm! 🎉
🧵 1/13
Ed Yong cut his #SciComm teeth with his acclaimed blog Not Exactly Rocket Science. 🚫🚀🧪

He got real good REAL fast.

Scientists AND journalists quickly recognized that he was one of the best science writers working in the blog format. 2/13
Several of Ed's blog posts appeared in The Open Laboratory anthology of best science blogging.

I can't remember how many times his work was featured. It was many. 3/13 "The Best Science Writing Online 2012" book cover.
The Not Exactly Rocket Science blog took a meandering path over its run.

It started at Wordpress in 2006 with DOZENS of readers... 4/13
Then the blog moved to ScienceBlogs (an influential network for a while)

then to Discover magazine (ooh, established national magazine)

then to National Geographic (one world's most ICONIC magazine brands). 5/13
Ed wrote Not Exactly Rocket Science for 10 years and racked up over 1,800 posts.

He also started writing projects for little places like @SciAm, @newscientist, and @nature.

And he wrote a book 📖, I Contain Multitudes.

You know, regular stuff. 😉 6/13 Book "I Contain Multitides" on shelf.
Ed only folded the Not Exactly Rocket Science blog when he started working full time for @TheAtlantic.

His last post is here nationalgeographic.com/science/articl… (may be paywalled). 7/13
Some of Ed's pieces before COVID-19 seemed downright prophetic. Like, Pythia, Oracle of Delphi level prophetic.

This piece in 2018 asked all the right questions. It's like, "He tried to warn us all." theatlantic.com/magazine/archi… 8/13
Ed's #SciComm biology blogging, and his book on microbes 🦠, served him in good stead when COVID-19 hit.

He had the knowledge and skills to put the pandemic in perspective in a way few could. 9/13
Ed's #SciComm writing is remarkable not only for its technical accuracy and insights, but because his pieces are so often infused with great EMPATHY.

For scientists. For readers. For people caught up in moments bigger than them.

His words have homour, warmth, and care. 10/13
I feel lucky 🍀 that I happen to be in charge of the @iamscicomm account as this year's @pulitzerprizes are announced.

I know Ed a little through the blogging and the science online community. I could not be happier for this win 🥇 for him. 11/13
The joke is that there are only two prizes 🏆 that count: he Pulitzer and the Nobel.

Having bagged one, I wouldn't count him out of the running for the other just yet. 12/13
It only remains for me to say:

Congratulations, @edyong209! 🎉

I'd wish you success in your next steps, but this somehow seems redundant at this point. 13/13

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with @IAmSciComm - On a Break!

@IAmSciComm - On a Break! Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @iamscicomm

Nov 2, 2022
I have 10+ years of university-level education.

But no lecture taught me how to create good visualizations.

These things are crucial for communication but are often not part of the training.

So, let's have a crash course on visualization guidelines anyone can implement. 🧵
1. Know your audience

You can't use the same visualization for every audience.

A plot that works in a scientific journal may bore (or confuse) non-scientists.
2. Know your takeaways

Forget the dream of putting ALL of your great insights into one powerful plot.

This. does. not. work.

If anything, this dream is a gateway to using too many chart types all at once.

Visualize only your most important insights (maybe in separate plots).
Read 17 tweets
Nov 1, 2022
There are hundreds of online resources for learning how to code.

But there are much fewer online resources for math.

Maybe that's because LaTeX (the premier math writing tool) isn't good at creating them.

#QuartoPub can do both. So, is it a worthy alternative?🧵 #mathematics
What is Quarto?

Short answer: It's a tool that can create many output formats all from one interface.

That means you can create classical PDF math papers as well as online math books with Quarto.
You may be sceptical about the online part. Maybe you have only seen math in PDF format.

But I assure you that it's a real thing. And it's powerful.

For example, every day hundreds of mathematicians on MathOverflow talk about research-level math online. mathoverflow.net
Read 16 tweets
Oct 31, 2022
Quarto becomes *really* cool when you see all the beautiful outputs it can create.

Let's have a look at some more #QuartoPub examples.

Let's start with good old fashioned PDF documents.

With Quarto, you can still do all the PDF stuff you used to do.

nmfs-opensci.github.io/quarto_titlepa… ImageImage
You can even add beautiful title pages to your PDFs.
nmfs-opensci.github.io/quarto_titlepa… Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 30, 2022
Alright, another common misconception I encounter is the gene vs allele/variant mixup. Most often I see it phrased something like "She has the gene for breast cancer."
In this example, I think we all understand what the person means: she has a genetic variant that makes her more predisposed to breast cancer. For a lot of purposes, that's the only information we really need.
But in reality, we all have two copies or alleles of the BRCA2 gene, one from each parent. But some of us have versions of that gene that make us more prone to developing breast cancer.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 30, 2022
Alright, time to talk some DNA misconceptions and how we can try and break them down!

First up, myths about dominant and recessive traits.
This one hurts, because I thought a lot of these were true for a while!

Often when learning about genetics, we learn that things like tongue-rolling, attached earlobes, and PTC tasting are pure dominant/recessive traits. They're simple, easy traits to demonstrate in a classroom.
But unfortunately, many of them aren't really true dominant/recessive traits! There's a great website called "Myths of Human Genetics" by John H. McDonald at the University of Delaware that breaks down where many of these myths came from: udel.edu/~mcdonald/myth…
Read 12 tweets
Aug 30, 2022
Good morning, all! Today, we're gonna talk about the importance of SciComm in Genetics. Why genetics specifically?

Because that's what my PhD is in, so I'm biased towards it being the coolest science 😂.
BUT ALSO because I strongly believe we're all increasingly asked to make choices that involve genetics in our everyday lives, and I want to equip everyone with the vocabulary to feel comfortable making these choices, from getting a DNA test at the doctor to understanding GMOs.
And while I've believed this for a long time, it was thrown into an incredible spotlight over the past few years, as things like PCR and RNA became household words. Imagine my delight as I saw RNA trending, and then the sadness as I found threads full of misinformation.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(