I think a lot of anti-CRT people would agree that "white" isn't a very useful label. People are Irish or Italian or German heritage or whatever or better yet we are all just individuals that deserve dignity. "Black" and "white" are weird social constructs that somebody made up.
If "black" and "white" and "race" in general are all just constructs that keep us divided then shouldn't we work together to dismantle these arbitrary categories so we can all just live our lives as individuals?
The good news is I think a lot of CRT folks also agree with this. As far as I can tell, many CRT folks also want to get to a point where we can abolish these arbitrary racial constructs so we can live in a freer society.
CRT-influenced social thinkers often call this construct that lumps all "white" people together "whiteness" and say things like we should "dismantle whiteness" meaning the arbitrary category. Sometimes, anti-CRT thinkers hear this as saying abolish the humans who have been put...
...in the "white" category. But I think what CRT folks are actually saying is if you're currently classified as "white" then it would be better to reclassify you as Irish American or German heritage or to just look at you as being a unique individual human being.
I really do think a huge number of anti-CRT folks would prefer a world like that so it's confusing that people fight so much about this. Imagine not having to worry about being lumped in together with all the "white" people who did all those bad things in the past.
I think where CRT and anti-CRT folks differ is CRT folks think a necessary prerequisite to dismantling these categories is to put sustained effort into understanding what these categories are and how they work to propagate inequality and teaching this understanding to others.
The anti-CRT folks seem to think that if we just avoid talking about the social implications of these constructs ourselves and discourage others from doing so, then the bad consequences will naturally go away on their own.
I'm not going to say which approach seems more sensible to me. You decide for yourself. 👍

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🔥 Kareem Carr 🔥

🔥 Kareem Carr 🔥 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kareem_carr

12 Jun
I think that Ibram Kendi is just a consequentialist. Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges whether an action is right or wrong based on what its consequences are. By applying this to race, he concludes that all actions are either racist (wrong) or anti-racist (right).
Consequentialism has a long tradition in the West. It goes back to Jeremy Bentham (late 1700s) and John Stuart Mill (mid-1800s). It's also a cornerstone of Utilitarianism which is one of our main moral traditions.
To summarize, when Kendi says every social policy is either racist or anti-racist, this is just consequentialism, which is clearly grounded in classical Western thought. If you disagree with this then I think your fight is with Consequentialism as an idea not Kendi himself.
Read 4 tweets
12 Jun
I finally learned what CRT is. From what I understand, the idea is this: if you let people who assume black people are inferior create a social system then that social system will likely have the assumption that black people are inferior baked into it. This seems obviously true.
This isn't race specific. It should be intuitively clear that when humans design systems, they tend to bake their assumptions into their designs. As a statistician, I see the consequences of hidden assumptions all the time.
A lot of anti-CRT folks seem to think saying "the system almost certainly has racist assumptions baked into it" is the same as saying "EVERYTHING is racist". This is binary thinking which is a cognitive bias that happens a lot when people feel threatened.
Read 5 tweets
27 May
My opinion on Bayesian statistics is it flows naturally from a Bayesian philosophical perspective but since no philosophy is universally accepted among humans, Bayesian statistics is deeply in conflict with how many people see the world. Whether this is good or bad, I don't know.
Frequentist statistics is grounded in frequencies of events. Since all humans can (objectively?) observe events and count them, Frequentism starts out from a more simple, less philosophy-dependent position.
People can and do add their own philosophies on to Frequentism which can make it seem a bit philosophically confused and incoherent. I think this incoherence and confusion is what Bayesians are often reacting to when they critique Frequentism.
Read 5 tweets
13 May
how it started how it's going
apparently you can just buy mushroom growing kits on internet. these are called pink oysters. imma bout to fry these bad boys up. will keep you folks posted.
a little butter, garlic, salt, pepper. not going to lie. i’m having mixed feelings about cooking and eating my children...
Read 4 tweets
7 May
People ask me about getting started with data science all the time. So I came up with three paths for self study: Easy, Medium and Hard.

Continue reading to hear about each path and see my book recommendations. 🧵👇
EASY PATH. On this path, you will get lots of practical skills but only an intuitive sense of the theory. I think the easiest way to start is to read a good data science book and get your hands dirty. I like to recommend "R for Data Science" for that.
MEDIUM PATH. This path gives you some theory with an eye toward applications. A lot of books at this difficulty level suck. The formatting and writing are often bad and the authors are clearly phoning it in. I like "Think Stats" because it's not like that.
Read 6 tweets
16 Apr
live footage from boston. lol. why do i even live here? 😂
decided to crack open the windows, turn on my winter playlist and set up my desktop fireplace.
here's the link. it's pretty simple. just a concrete bowl that you can pour rubbing alcohol into. (i'm not getting any money to share this. unfortunately. 😅. ) amazon.com/colsen-Tableto…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(