1. Wuhan Institute of Virology and REMDESIVIR
(Patent and Paper)
Second analysis by Jian Kang, New York Medical College Associate Professor @jkssdk0907
The first analysis was posted yesterday here:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China
2. On February 4, 2020, the Wuhan Institute of Virology announced on its official website whiov.cas.cn/kyjz_105338/20… (now deleted) that on January 21, 2020, it had declared a Chinese invention patent on the "use of anti-2019 novel coronavirus" Remdesivir. archive.ph/88ecC
3. The experimental data that the application relied on was sent to Cell Research on January 25, 2020, and published as a Letter to the Editor on February 4th 2020 in the journal, Nature. (nature.com/articles/s4142…)
4. The content of this paper (see attached figure) includes:
A. the culture of SARS-COV-2 virus in a Vero E6 cell line
B. the use of anti-bat SARS-like virus antibodies to identify SARS-COV-2 virus
C. the test of seven compounds on the growth of SARS-COV-2 virus
5. The experiments include the simultaneous addition of viruses and compounds, the early or delayed addition of compounds.
Each compound was tested at 6-7 concentrations, with three samples for each concentration, and a control group for each concentration.
6. The degree of virus infection was analyzed by anti-bat SARS-like virus antibody, qRT-PCR and Western Blot.
7. Using anti-bat-like SARS virus antibodies to identify SARS-COV-2 here requires a lot of preliminary experiments to determine why anti-bat-like SARS virus antibodies instead of others such as anti-human SARS virus antibodies, anti-bat RaTG13 virus & anti-human SARS-2 antibodies
8. In addition to statistical analysis of data, writing papers, and English corrections, the general laboratory may need half a year to a year, and the fastest and most powerful laboratory may also need at least 2-3 months to complete this experimental study!
9. Yet..The Letter to the Editor was Published:
04 February 2020
The letter discussed the Institute’s evaluation of ribavirin, penciclovir, nitazoxanide, nafamostat, chloroquine and two well-known broad-spectrum antiviral drugs remdesivir (GS-5734) and favipiravir (T-705)
10. Conclusion
If the Wuhan Institute of Virology completed this paper in 2 months, then the time for the isolation of the SARS-COV-2 virus strain would be before November 21, 2019, instead of the officially announced January 5, 2020
11. The Wuhan Institute of Virology - Time Lords?
A similar miraculous feat was noted by Bernd Kaina in:
"On the Origin of SARS-CoV-2: Did Cell Culture Experiments Lead to Increased Virulence of the Progenitor Virus for Humans?"
1. He had a long, rich history & expertise in creating stealth biological weapons that evade tests, confuse diagnosis, & torment the afflicted with slow, chronic diseases, neurological problems & cancers
"He specialized in developing incapacitating biological agents and mastered the art of this new class of germ weapons that were nearly incurable and caused devious effects on the afflicted"
"Stealth biological weapons that attack the core of your being, that do not show up in diagnostic tests nor show any abnormal blood work that doctors use to diagnose, & without the level of inflammation that doctors can see in scans"
1. Heinz Felfe was head of the Soviet counter-intelligence Department & ran a long running project called "Panoptikum" to uncover a high level "mole" within the West German Intelligence Service...
In the end, the target of "Panoptikum" would turn out to be Heinz Felfe himself!
2. His Memoirs (in German)
Heinz Felfe published his memoir in 1986 under the title "In the Service of the enemy: Ten years as Moscow's man in the Federal Intelligence Service"
"During initial stages of a forensic investigation of Wuhan Labs, all 4 evaluation tools including Grunow & Finke's epidemiological assessment criteria would be useful adjuncts to the investigation framework of Pilch et al."
"The Radosavljevic–Belojevic method for outbreak scoring & differentiation shows that official assumptions of its natural origin is questionable & highlights the probability that the pathogen was "accidentally" introduced to humans"