1. Wuhan Institute of Virology and REMDESIVIR
(Patent and Paper)
Second analysis by Jian Kang, New York Medical College Associate Professor @jkssdk0907
The first analysis was posted yesterday here:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China
2. On February 4, 2020, the Wuhan Institute of Virology announced on its official website whiov.cas.cn/kyjz_105338/20… (now deleted) that on January 21, 2020, it had declared a Chinese invention patent on the "use of anti-2019 novel coronavirus" Remdesivir. archive.ph/88ecC
3. The experimental data that the application relied on was sent to Cell Research on January 25, 2020, and published as a Letter to the Editor on February 4th 2020 in the journal, Nature. (nature.com/articles/s4142…)
4. The content of this paper (see attached figure) includes:
A. the culture of SARS-COV-2 virus in a Vero E6 cell line
B. the use of anti-bat SARS-like virus antibodies to identify SARS-COV-2 virus
C. the test of seven compounds on the growth of SARS-COV-2 virus
5. The experiments include the simultaneous addition of viruses and compounds, the early or delayed addition of compounds.
Each compound was tested at 6-7 concentrations, with three samples for each concentration, and a control group for each concentration.
6. The degree of virus infection was analyzed by anti-bat SARS-like virus antibody, qRT-PCR and Western Blot.
7. Using anti-bat-like SARS virus antibodies to identify SARS-COV-2 here requires a lot of preliminary experiments to determine why anti-bat-like SARS virus antibodies instead of others such as anti-human SARS virus antibodies, anti-bat RaTG13 virus & anti-human SARS-2 antibodies
8. In addition to statistical analysis of data, writing papers, and English corrections, the general laboratory may need half a year to a year, and the fastest and most powerful laboratory may also need at least 2-3 months to complete this experimental study!
9. Yet..The Letter to the Editor was Published:
04 February 2020
The letter discussed the Institute’s evaluation of ribavirin, penciclovir, nitazoxanide, nafamostat, chloroquine and two well-known broad-spectrum antiviral drugs remdesivir (GS-5734) and favipiravir (T-705)
10. Conclusion
If the Wuhan Institute of Virology completed this paper in 2 months, then the time for the isolation of the SARS-COV-2 virus strain would be before November 21, 2019, instead of the officially announced January 5, 2020
11. The Wuhan Institute of Virology - Time Lords?
A similar miraculous feat was noted by Bernd Kaina in:
"On the Origin of SARS-CoV-2: Did Cell Culture Experiments Lead to Increased Virulence of the Progenitor Virus for Humans?"
"During shooting in Thailand, I was shocked by Daszak’s fast & loose with facts, his refusal to acknowledge his conflict of interest,& his denial of his gain-of-function res in collaboration with Wuhan lab"
You guessed right, i hope?
@janeqiuchina
She continued:
"I was equally shocked by Daszak’s constant self-promotion and how effective it was."
@janeqiuchina About the film:
"Blame: Bats, Politics & a Planet Out of Balance"
"Christian Frei seemed entranced by hero worshipping, apparently having lost all sense of objectivity & critical judgment. I felt strongly then, as I do now, that the film was a blatant piece of propaganda"
Bloody Hell, it's worse than even I imagined in my darkest nightmares about #scamdemia.
Time to spend some of this tax money on local electronics, biological, ecological, IT, optical, chemistry, engineering & physics labs run by local amateurs for the benefit of our communities?
Short 🧵on Primer & PCR Test issues (Pangolin Covs)
1. The key issue with pangolins and Pcovs is that:
It was discovered that the standard PCR tests used in 2020, and often still used, failed to actually detect many of the betacoronaviruses generously hosted by the pangolins.
2. Unless
The samples are retested with bespoke primers & more accurate PCR tests available now,
We will not know exactly whIch Pangolin (or bat) coronaviruses were hosted by Pangolins at WIV & elsewhere pre-pandemic.
However, "they" (I will name who they are later) should, and perhaps in the future, may retest the stored samples at WIV, IPB, SCAU AND GIABR, to clarify the question of which coronaviruses were present in their pangolin samples.
2. May have been for research and commercial purposes, but they were caught bang to rights.
"LIU initially stated that he did not know what the materials were and that someone must have put them into his bag"
3. When asked why someone would put them into his bag, LIU stated that he did not know, and that maybe he had accidentally put the materials there. After further questioning, LIU acknowledged that the materials were different strains of the pathogen Fusarium graminearum