1. Wuhan Institute of Virology and REMDESIVIR
(Patent and Paper)
Second analysis by Jian Kang, New York Medical College Associate Professor @jkssdk0907
The first analysis was posted yesterday here:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China
2. On February 4, 2020, the Wuhan Institute of Virology announced on its official website whiov.cas.cn/kyjz_105338/20… (now deleted) that on January 21, 2020, it had declared a Chinese invention patent on the "use of anti-2019 novel coronavirus" Remdesivir. archive.ph/88ecC
3. The experimental data that the application relied on was sent to Cell Research on January 25, 2020, and published as a Letter to the Editor on February 4th 2020 in the journal, Nature. (nature.com/articles/s4142…)
4. The content of this paper (see attached figure) includes:
A. the culture of SARS-COV-2 virus in a Vero E6 cell line
B. the use of anti-bat SARS-like virus antibodies to identify SARS-COV-2 virus
C. the test of seven compounds on the growth of SARS-COV-2 virus
5. The experiments include the simultaneous addition of viruses and compounds, the early or delayed addition of compounds.
Each compound was tested at 6-7 concentrations, with three samples for each concentration, and a control group for each concentration.
6. The degree of virus infection was analyzed by anti-bat SARS-like virus antibody, qRT-PCR and Western Blot.
7. Using anti-bat-like SARS virus antibodies to identify SARS-COV-2 here requires a lot of preliminary experiments to determine why anti-bat-like SARS virus antibodies instead of others such as anti-human SARS virus antibodies, anti-bat RaTG13 virus & anti-human SARS-2 antibodies
8. In addition to statistical analysis of data, writing papers, and English corrections, the general laboratory may need half a year to a year, and the fastest and most powerful laboratory may also need at least 2-3 months to complete this experimental study!
9. Yet..The Letter to the Editor was Published:
04 February 2020
The letter discussed the Institute’s evaluation of ribavirin, penciclovir, nitazoxanide, nafamostat, chloroquine and two well-known broad-spectrum antiviral drugs remdesivir (GS-5734) and favipiravir (T-705)
10. Conclusion
If the Wuhan Institute of Virology completed this paper in 2 months, then the time for the isolation of the SARS-COV-2 virus strain would be before November 21, 2019, instead of the officially announced January 5, 2020
11. The Wuhan Institute of Virology - Time Lords?
A similar miraculous feat was noted by Bernd Kaina in:
"On the Origin of SARS-CoV-2: Did Cell Culture Experiments Lead to Increased Virulence of the Progenitor Virus for Humans?"
1. The long awaited 293 questions for Dr. Ralph Baric have finally been completed and shared! Long live the quest for truth! You are hereby invited to read the sharpest, most lethal 293-question dossier ever built.
1. "These tiny fragments were far smaller than cells and even smaller than many viruses. Some were close to the size of DNA strands. Under high magnification, she noticed small hooked shapes with sharp points.
✴️2. OVERLOOKED
"She realized that the plastic in human brains was not only present, but surprisingly small. The fragments were so tiny that common diagnostic tools could not detect them. Pathologists had likely been overlooking them for years."
"The two original samples showed a strong link between plastic particles and dementia. As Bearer expanded her work to ten more donated brains, she found plastic in every single one. None were free of synthetic fragments."
Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
🧵3. Summary of Redfield's Statements
(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)
He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.
He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.
"Of note, the spike protein of this novel bat coronavirus possesses a functional FCS at the S1/S2 junction with a unique amino acid sequence motif (RDAR) that differs from that found in SARS-CoV-2 (RRAR) by only 1 amino acid."
"The molecular biology capabilities of WIV & the genome assessment are consistent with the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 was a lab-engineered virus that was part of a bank of chimeric viruses in Zheng-Li Shi's laboratory at WIV that escaped from containment"
Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created full-length a infectious clone in pBAC-CMV using an unpublished bat Coronavirus genome as template (BatCoVX)
page 85
3. Hypothesis 3:
Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created chimeric Bat-CoV-X viruses using the pBACCMV-BCOVX backbone and swapping out key cassettes with other bat Coronaviruses (RBD, RBM, etc.) and adding additional features such as a furin cleavage site