Josh MacAlister has publicly criticised child protection social workers for being overreaching and intrusive, institutionally biased against families.
His #carereview wants to halt the "runaway train" of child protection, which he blames for taking too many children and young people into care.
This is a huge call for a review which has been in place for just three months and is thinly staffed. But the direction of travel is clear. Social workers should back off.
For me, the danger of this rush to judgment could not be clearer. I know enough about child protection to understand that the biggest risk to children currently is that many are left in harm's way on the edge of care, or are not known to social workers at all.
I also know enough about how this works to have anticipated this #carereview outcome from the current series of Sunday Times articles.
Hell knows what frontline social workers are meant to make of this. I fear that hundreds of cases involving children at risk will now be filed under "too difficult."
Externally, so much importance is attached to the legacy and impact of Baby P, because the number of child protection cases has risen since then.
But this is to ignore the profound changes in society which have taken place since then. Those who point to Baby P assume everything else has stood still.
Ask any experienced foster carer. The children we care for now have suffered harm and experienced deep trauma that was rare a decade ago.
There's a political juggernaut that aims to undermine confidence in professionals and experts in public service. Not just social workers but also GPs, teachers and judges, for example. It is hard to compete.
When it comes to child protection, shifting the blame to social workers for what has happened over the past 10 years is as low as it gets.
This needs to be marked as a critical moment, coming just as we begin to understand and address the impact of lockdown.
I know a small number of social workers who have left their roles because they could not bear to walk away from children who needed their help. I don't know if they are typical, but I suspect there are many more.
Longer thread than I ever intended, but I find this particular proposal deeply troubling. Keep experienced professionals at bay, get the neighbours to step up.
Not how I intended to spend early Sunday a.m. But I read this article last thing last night and it has kept me awake for much of the night.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Martin Barrow

Martin Barrow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MartinBarrow

11 Jun
Local authorities have handed responsibility for many vulnerable children to voracious private equity firms. The consequences are catastrophic. 1/
Ofsted has just published an inspection report into a home for children in care owned by Radical Services Ltd, a subsidiary of the private equity firm Ardenton Capital.
2/
It is judged inadequate by every measure. Image
Read 13 tweets
11 Jun
This @CommunityCare
article casually cites the National Centre for Excellence in Residential Child Care (NCERCC) and Revolution Consulting as impartial observers when they are, in fact, as one with the privatisation lobby group #ICHA
communitycare.co.uk/2021/06/11/cut…
In fair, they are quoting Josh MacAlister. But somebody needs to call this stuff out, honestly.
Children's services are increasingly in the pocket of private providers. Yesterday's event was a good example of the closeness between them. Much back-slapping and talk about partnership, notwithstanding MacAlister's speech.
Read 4 tweets
21 Apr
This new West Midlands taskforce to find foster families is spending public money on @NFG_Fostering, which is owned by private equity and ultimately run from on offshore tax haven.

What is the point of all of this?

cypnow.co.uk/news/article/w…
Also, is it really the case that there are significant numbers of children and young people in children's homes who could move to foster care?
FFS, we are so deep down the rabbit hole.
Read 4 tweets
23 Mar
New today: Ofsted has published a damning report into By The Bridge, the flagship private sector foster care agency. This agency is responsible for the lives of 359 children in care. files.ofsted.gov.uk/v1/file/501612…
By The Bridge is part of the giant private company CareTech, worth around £600 million. Last year it was paid £430 million by local authorities to care for children and young people. Some of its directors earn £1 million a year.
By The Bridge trades heavily on the high allowances it pays its foster carers. Its website claims the average is £450 a week per child. bythebridge.co.uk/im-interested-…
Read 8 tweets
23 Mar
Ofsted has ordered the closure of this children's home in Blackpool owned by the private company Care 4 Children Holdco because of the neglect of children living here.

files.ofsted.gov.uk/v1/file/501612…
It is clear that this 'home' has not been fit for purpose for many months. But local authorities share blame for the harm inflicted on children.
This home was rated 'good' at the last full inspection, way back in 2019.
Read 5 tweets
23 Mar
Ofsted has shut down the children's home at Fullerton Park residential special school in Doncaster over concerns about the children's safety.
examinerlive.co.uk/news/local-new…
This school is owned by a huge private company, Hesley Group. Last year it was paid £54 million by local councils to care for vulnerable children and young people.
Hesley is owned by wealthy investors based in the tax haven of Luxembourg. Cedar Luxco is also involved with Kisimul, another private provider of care with a poor record with children's safety.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(