There is a lot of chatter about when a startup should create a “growth team.” But I am recently hearing of a much better and even more important trend of startups starting a research team or a much better name coined by @abrashafi of @irldotcom, a

“Curiosity team”
With a research or Curiosity team you want to hire PhD level social scientists and researchers.

People who know how to run studies - both qualitative (Eg interviews, diary studies) and quantitative (Eg surveys) - and identify and characterize real insights about your users
The key is being curious about who your customers are, what are the challenges they face in life, what problems can you solve for them, what problems *are* you solving for them.

I find it so valuable to hear the words and language customers use to describe themselves and you.
With incredible researchers - you get insights that go far beyond your own instincts.
To be clear, this analysis won’t give you your product solutions. Customers never can tell you what to build.

But even better it will spark ideas.

Customers will tell you what is going on in their lives.

Your curiosity team will provide the insights into what they need.
A lot of people say the product manager is the voice of the customer. But if set up properly, the researcher or the curiosity team is the true voice of the customer. They have spent more time talking to customers, poring over survey data, and reading answers than anyone else.
This allows the product team to be the voice of the business - balancing customer needs against feasibility and business strategy. And still keeps someone on the core team representing customers and their needs and wants and language everywhere.
For any consumer company I would hire researchers and build a curiosity team at least as early as a growth team. The earliest people should be having and getting these insights from talking to customers all the time.
This early investment is a huge reason for Robinhood’s success. Some of my greatest learnings in my career have come from thoughtful research. For example a study we did with trained researchers early in my time at Twitter joshelman.medium.com/four-questions…
Anyway - build a curiosity team and hire some researchers!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Elman 🇺🇸

Josh Elman 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshelman

30 Nov 20
1/ Some personal news…
2/ I’m joining Apple to work on @AppStore and help customers discover the best apps for them.
3/ I’m really excited to get to build ways to help over a billion customers and millions of developers connect.
Read 10 tweets
5 Aug 20
Been noodling on the concept of 10x Career Decisions. Those are the ones where you take roles in which you get to work on something that grows at least 10x (users, engagement, revenue, market cap) while you work on it.
The tech industry is rare in that there have been many many of these opportunities over the past 20 years as tech has exploded from millions of daily connected users to billions of hourly connected users.
These are the great roles as you get to so much and do so many different things to handle the explosive growth. You see much more than in any job that doesn’t grow as fast
Read 6 tweets
1 Aug 20
We keep comparing “media networks” (Tiktok, Youtube, Twitter) and “social media networks” (Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat) as if they are similar. Both can be user generated content. At their core, they are more different than alike. Even if the social networks include some media
In social networks - the most important piece is finding and connecting with people you know directly. This becomes your core. All of the network building is getting from your contacts into codified relationships in the product.
In social networks you come back to the product often primarily to see content from those people you know. You post more often too - hoping to see responses from the people you know.
Read 11 tweets
5 Jun 20
Rewarding the Bully. I have been trying to capture what is broken in our society and also in our social platforms right now and I think it comes down to this. So many of our systems right now are wired to reward the bully.
Our social platforms celebrate the bully. The bully gets engagement. The bully gets replies who cheer them on, or try to debate. The bully gets amplified. It is one tap away to reply and be a bully yourself. The platform sees the engagement and makes bullies more famous.
When you are on the same side as a bully you might even feel good. Feel protected. Until the bully turns on you. Society, our media, our social platforms all reward the bully. When you are on the same side, you are rewarded too. Until you arent. Then you feel it. It’s too late.
Read 11 tweets
22 May 20
Doing a lot of work to prevent something bad from happening is always hard to measure. “What if we overbuilt?” “Maybe the bad thing wouldn’t have happened anyway?” Disaster planning and preparation is an art, not a science.
You can’t measure the success really unless or until the disaster happens. And in those awful situations, we often reward the heroes who fought through the disaster more than the ones who prevented it.
For example - after the San Francisco earthquake in 1989, I remember a lot more stories of the heroes who saved people from awful freeway collapses instead of the designers of the other freeways that didn’t collapse at all.
Read 11 tweets
16 May 20
Seeing so much confusion about Clubhouse and consumer valuations. Here’s the thing. Companies that connect people, and have people generate content can become incredibly valuable. Like 20-30B (twitter snapchat whatsapp) and way beyond (FB, Instagram, Youtube)
Any earlier VC valuation of a consumer company isn’t a “current value” based on revenues and multiples but is a bet on the potential it can become. For example many consumer networks get to very large scale before investing in monetization at all
The other side of consumer networks is if they don’t work and get to scale, they may not be very valuable at all. There isn’t a ton of IP that gets built, it instead depends on usage. We have seen many fall to outcomes far below capital raised, if not winddowns entirely
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(