White panic over kids learning truth about America's racist history has a long pedigree. In 3rd grade, white teachers got angry at me for reading Roots in the back of class during free time. The Black teachers encouraged it but the white ones were enraged (1)
THREAD
This was the year the miniseries was on, and the teachers wanted to either bury conversation about it (and its subject matter) or have us "trace our family tree" without thinking of how Black kids might experience that, and w/o confronting the enslavement elephant in the room (2)
I gather that this is what white conservatives prefer: avoiding truth and pain and conflict and contradiction and evil (if committed in our country and in our name or for our benefit). They have never wanted to face it. Not 200 years ago, and not today (3)...
And we just keep papering it over, we keep lying. And we say we do it to protect the kids from painful lessons. But who are we protecting? Not Black kids. Ignoring the experience of racism doesn't protect them from it. It merely makes it impossible for us to address it (4)...
...and that's what white folks are really worried about. If we tell the truth, and not only to kids of color (who often already learn it at home), but also to whites (who don't) it might cause some of those white kids to rethink their attachment to whiteness (5)...
When those teachers lashed out at me for reading Roots, or two years later when one teacher told my mom she was unfit for allowing me my friendships (mostly Black kids at the time), they were policing a border--the border of acceptable whiteness...(6)...
Their fear then, and now, is that their children haven't yet fully bought into the bullshit. Kids still question. They still believe in fairness. They haven't learned to go along with injustice yet. They need to squash solidarity before it grows..(7)...
White folk should view this attack on antiracist education not merely as an attack on folks of color, and Black people especially. But also as an attack on OUR kids and us. People trying to force us back into THIR conception of what it means to be a person of European descent (8)
We must insist that our kids too deserve better than this. We need people of European descent to engage in a special form of European DISSENT...dissent from white supremacy, phony history, and lies in the service of blind patriotism./ END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Those attacking Critical Race Theory want us to get bogged down explaining why they don't understand CRT, or what CRT really is. Don't fall for it. Flip the frame. By their own admission, they seek to lump all discussion of racism, past or present, under the CRT label...
THREAD
...Bc they don't want any analysis of racism as a historic or contemporary force in the U.S. This is why even books like To Kill a Mockingbird are coming under attack, and books looking at segregation are being called "divisive" because they cast whites in a 'bad' light (2)...
Rather than spend time trying to explain what CRT is, expose their real agenda: canceling truth about history and its lingering effects. Censorship. Book banning. And as I said in an earlier thread directed at one of their main attack dogs, their approach would cancel MLK...(3)
Hey @realchrisrufo. Serious Q: anti CRT legislation seeks to ban teaching that could "promote division" or cause discomfort for a racial group. So, should schools ban MLKs Letter from Birmingham Jail, which condemns white moderates bc some white folks might feel attacked?...(1)
Or how about his book Why We Can't Wait, where he endorsed aff action, or his statement in the I Have a Dream Speech re America giving Black folks a bad check marked 'insufficient funds.' Is that un-American bc it recognized how racism had been foundational to the country?...(2)
Or his last address to the SCLC in which he noted the importance of Black folks affirming their beauty, a self-affirmation "made compelling by the white man's crimes against him." I mean, talking of "the white man's crimes?" My goodness...how racist, right Chris?...(3)
Critics of antiracist teaching say they just want history taught in an "unbiased" way with "no agenda." First, that's a lie: their version of history has an agenda...blind patriotism without complication. That's not a neutral presentation...(1)
Second, they don't mean it: they don't intend to teach about the revolutionary war from "both sides," nor the bombing of Pearl Harbor, nor 9/11...We won't be hearing a balanced presentation of Hitler's take on Jews in the WWII section (nor should we) (2)...
Third, if they really believed in "presenting all sides" w/o an agenda that would actually be an argument FOR teaching the 1619 Project, and antiracist perspectives and theories, not shutting them down. By squleching these they prove they just want the white conservative side (3)
What's most ironic about white folks criticizing antiracist history teaching for "making white students feel bad" is this: if we, as white folks, had picked BETTER white role models for our kids -- not enslavers but abolitionists -- this wouldn't have been an issue (1)...
If we had held up John Fee and Ellsberry Ambrose and the Grimke sisters, over the founders and other apologists for slavery -- thereby debunking the "they were just men of their day" excuse -- our kids would never feel shame bc they would know they could be antiracists (2)...
If we had held up antiracist white allies as examples of a different way to live in this skin, we'd never worry about white kids coming to think they were "inherently oppressive," bc they would know they had a choice, and have examples of what that choice looks like (3)...
The critics of antiracist teaching in schools say they want to prohibit teaching that casts white people in a "negative light." So they'll have to ban MLK, bc he said: "Large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility...than about justice and humanity...(1)
and bc he said: "America is reaping the harvest of hate and shame planted through generations of educational denial, political disfranchisement and economic exploitation of its black population," bc that could encourage "hatred of one's country," so King's gotta go...(2)
He also said: "capitalism was built on the exploitation and suffering of black slaves and continues to thrive on the exploitation of the poor — both black and white, both here and abroad…" so he'll need to be banned bc he suggested America's economy was built on injustice...(3)
In the latest edition of 'White folk trying to cover up history,' a group in Williamson Co. TN is angry about their elementary schools using the book 'Ruby Bridges Goes to School,' about Bridges's harrowing integration of New Orleans schools. The reasons should enrage you...(1)
According to the leader of the movement to ban it, the mention in the book of a 'large crowd of angry white people who didn't want Black children in a white school' drew too stark a contrast between Black and white people, and the book didn't offer 'redemption' at its end...(2)
Um, no. 1), the book doesn't draw the contrast between white and black people, HISTORY & the behavior of white people drew that contrast. 2) What does it mean to end w/ 'redemption?' Those white folk never apologized. Should we pretend everyone lived happily ever after? (3)...