Trent Telenko Profile picture
Jun 14, 2021 25 tweets 12 min read Read on X
This thread is another visit into the pyrrhic victory known as Operation Iceberg, the Apr 1945 invasion of Okinawa.

This thread is based on my Aug 2013 Chicagoboyz column "Technological Surprise & the Defeat of the 193rd Tank Battalion at Kakuzu Ridge"
chicagoboyz.net/archives/38455…
1/ XXIVth Corps 19 April 1945 situation map showing the 27th InThis is the wreck of a M4 Sherman tank on the approaches to
On 19 April 1945, the US Army’s 27th Inf Div launched an attack against the Kakuza Ridge position held by the 32nd Army on Okinawa with the 193rd Tank Btn's 30 tanks, S.P. assault guns, and attached armored flame throwers from the 713th Flame Tank Btn.
2/ This is a 713th Flame Tank Battalion M4 Sherman rebuilt as a
When the battle was over, 22 of the 30 AFV had been destroyed in a coordinated ambush by Japanese AT- guns, artillery, mortars & suicide close assault teams. Among the dead was the commander of the 193rd, on whom blame was laid for attacking without infantry in close support.
3/ This is a detailed Fire Plan Map of the Imperial Japanese ArThe commander of the 193rd TB had a great deal of faith in tThis is the description of the Sherman "backscratcher&q
After the catastrophe at Kakuzu Ridge, th 193rd TB was effectively disbanded & their remaining tanks were used as replacements by other US Army TBs.

This battle is referenced in most narrative account of Okinawa as proof of the tougher defenses US soldiers and marines
4/ Mines are not your friend.
...would face in an invasion of Japan.

It turns out that while this particular narrative has a great deal of truth, it isn’t the whole truth

Reversing Churchill, this narrative has a huge lie buried in a bodyguard of truth.
5/
The most important truth of this battle was that US troops suffered a technological surprise. The IJA were listening to the SCR-300, SCR-500 and SCR-600 series FM radios of US infantry, tanks and artillery forward observers at Kakuzu Ridge (& other battles through out the
6/
Pacific in 1945) with Japanese Type 94 (1934) Mark 6 walkie-talkie radio that was issued to every IJA Inf. btn.

US tanks were equipped with FM radios & their operators were told the IJA didn't have any FM gear & took no security precautions.
n-mmra.net/radio/94-6/94-…
7/
The poor performance of the 193rd Tank Btn on Okinawa at Kakuzu Ridge could be easily explained if that were the case.

So, serious charges require serious proof. Where's the proof?

"Show me the money!"

8/
This is the transcript of the 2005 PBS Show “Victory in the Pacific” that includes an interview of an Okinawan Student Conscript Katsuo Nagata who carried 10kg suicide bombs to Kakazu Ridge the night before the failed 193rd Tank Battalion/105th Infantry Regiment attack.
9/
So, the night before the 193rd TB's attack, the IJA independent 272th Inf Regt. knew US tanks were coming, check.

Where is the proof the IJA was using it's Type 94 (1934) Mark 6 walkie-talkie radio to monitor & exploit US Army radio communications?
10/
First let look at IJA radio via History of Technical Intelligence SWPA 1942 - 1945 Pg 90

"Lt Ford found that the Japanese type 97 portable wireless telephone set could receive signals clearly from US frequency modulated SCR-610 & SCR-300 sets at distances of 2300
11/
...to 3000 yards. This was important, as messages in the past had frequently been sent in the clear on these two sets. The 41st Division Signal officer, the G-2, and the Division artillery were given this information."

The capabilities of the type 94 walkie-talkie radio were
12/
...noticed in Luzon as well.

Intelligence bulletin. Vol III, No 12, Aug 1945 issue, noted that:

JAP WALKIE-TALKIE
Tests conducted with four Japanese Type 94 (1934) Mark 6 radios on Luzon reveal that it is possible for this amplitude modulated set to

cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/compoundob…
13/
...communicate with both the U. S. SCR-610 and SCR-608 FM sets. A small two-unit set of the Walkie-Talkie design, the Type 94 Mark 6 is standard equipment within the Japanese infantry battalion.

Results, of the tests show that the enemy sets operate satisfactorily with the

14/
...SCR-610 within a range of 1/4 to 1 & 1/2 miles, and with the SCR-608 within a range of 1/2 to 4 & 1/2 miles"

The article also detailed how to covert & maintain the IJA Walkie-Talkie with US Army batteries & vacuum tubes!

15/
So, the IJA had both radio means (link) & the motives. How do you prove the IJA about used its opportunities?

To understand this, you need to become familiar with the US Army vs USMC naming conventions for M4 Sherman main armament flame tanks.

lonesentry.com/manuals/handbo…

16/
The USMC called it's Iwo Jima M4 Sherman main armament flame tanks "C.B. Mk-1" AKA Construction Battalion Mark One.

Over the radio it was simply "Mark One"

17/
The US Army Chemical Warfare Service used a complicated designation that was more abused than used. It runs as follows:
Flamethrower, mechanized, main armament, CWS-POA "75" H1-H2

CWS - (see above)
POA - Pacific Ocean Area
"75" H-1 - See CB-H-1 Gun
H-2 - See fuel tanks
18/
Now we turn to IJA General Mitsuru Ushijima (same man both uniforms)

Ushijima issued 32D ARMY COMBAT DIRECTIVE No. 13. Which was captured, translated and reprinted in “Information on Japanese Defensive Installations and Tactics”, ARMY WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA.
20/
Ushijima directive (see text clips) came out after the US landings but before Marines used flame tanks in Southern Okinawa.

The 10th Army & XXIVth Corps Army units never called flame tanks "Mark One's"

So where was Ushijima getting "M-1" in DIRECTIVE No. 13 ?

21/
The only answer that works is that the IJA garrison on Iwo Jima heard USMC tank crew in the clear over their FM radios. Then the garrison there passed that information to Japan.

After reviewing IJA GHQ passed the intelligence to Gen Ushijima's 32nd Army staff.
22/
This brings up very difficult historical questions for the last year of the Pacific War starting with Navajo code talkers at Iwo Jima.

While they were a safe code there...

...they were not EVERY CODE at Iwo Jima.

23/
How many US Marine infantry attacks were anticipated by Lieut. Gen. Tadamichi Kuribayashi's garrison because they were listening to USMC tankers talking in the clear on FM radios they thought secure?
24/
No historical research on the last 12 months of ground warfare in the Pacific War that uses official American military histories can be relied upon. Extensive primary research on both any surviving Japanese and American military documents must be done with the idea
25/
...that low level American FM radio communications could and were monitored. Only then can you select items from the official histories for use.

“Trust, but verify” applies as much to military history as it does to nuclear arms control treaties.
/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trent Telenko

Trent Telenko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TrentTelenko

May 23
We have seen an evolution from 7-inch to 10-inch and now to 15-inch propeller drone designs for FPV's since 2023 in the Russo-Ukrainian War.

The question going forward is the choice of fiber optic guided or radio links.

Drone CRPA🧵
1/
The cost of putting serious radio link electronic counter-countermeasures (ECCM) on an FPV drone using a CRPA is way high.

Grok has an adequate estimate on what Chinese CRPA's cost.

2/
grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…Image
Even basic Russian Kometa 4-channel design CRPAs are hundreds of dollars apiece.

To beat intensive ECM/Jamming at the front lines with 8, 12, or 16 element CRPA will cost hundreds to thousands per drone.

Plus CRPA weight & power drain impacts the drone w/bigger batteries.

3/ Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
May 22
Guns rule in the age of drones, but the "muffin top" Burke class DDG's are so top heavy with the SLQ-32(V)7 Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP) installation that the idea of adding 76mm or 57mm autocannons is insane from the metacentric height POV.

1/ Image
Image
Image
What to do?

You can proliferate light precision guided weapon mounts. Which can be the 21st century version of the 20mm oerlikon.

A Burke needs multiple Hydra and APKWS 70mm semi-active laser guided rocket mounts on the centerline and both broadsides.

2/ Image
Image
The US Navy is already slapping deck crew operated 25mm autocannons and .50 caliber HMG all over Burke class DDG's already.

3/ Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
May 21
I've been posting about the inertia of Russian civil infrastructure industrial disinvestment for some time regarding Russian railways and it's foreign bearings.

The key tell going forward is triage.

This western part problem also applies to Russian Coal fired power plants
1/ Image
...and we are seeing triage there now that will apply to Russian railways later.

Non-Russian core populations areas of Russia have been cut off from modernization and restoration of thermal power plants due to a lack of Western parts.

2/Image
Image
Image
Image
There are grave implications in that for the electrified Trans-Siberian railway.

Russian railways are already seeing repair trains derail on the journey to go fix derailments.

3/
Read 6 tweets
May 21
While this @Tatarigami_UA 🧵concentrates on the modernization of pieces of the Russian military-industrial base as a cautionary tale.

It leaves a throw away line about economic collapse that leaves out the reality of Russian industrial/infrastructure disinvestment which will
1/
...continue for years even if the fighting stops tomorrow.

The rundown of Russian stocks of western railway bearing will continue for years because the specialty steel supply chain feeding western bearing manufacturers has shut down unused capacity after 3-years of war.

2/ Image
It will take years to "turn on" the specialty steel pipeline to even begin to make new bearings for the Russian railways.

Compounding the matter is the extreme age of the Russian rolling stock fleet of 1.1 million freight cars/wagons at the beginning of the war.

3/ Image
Read 23 tweets
May 19
We need to place this highly innovative Chinese artillery shell to drone precision guidance kit in its military-technical perspective.

China has taken the late 1960's US idea of a laser bomb now kit and the late 1980's Australian Kerkanya glide wing and tail kit and
put...
1/ Image
Image
Image
...them on 152/155mm artillery shells as a drone munitions.

Boeing took the Australian Kerkanya DSTO GTV technology demonstrator and later made the JDAM-ER.

China took the Paveway & JDAM-ER kit ideas and mashed them together for a much cheaper
2/ Image
...precision guided munition than anything that can survive a 40,000 Gee force ballistic tube launch.

A M1156 precision guidance fuze costs $13,500 as compared with Excalibur’s $113,000 per round because of the mil-spec electronics.

3/ Image
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
May 18
Brian Iselin on medium -dot- com has a very nice final article in a series of three on how the loss of oil income is killing Russian shell production.

This is a figure from that article:

1/3 Image
This opening paragraph is killer:

"Russia’s military machine doesn’t run on patriotism. It runs on petrodollars. Look at this chart and understand what you’re seeing: the death spiral of an empire, measured in dollars per barrel.

2/3
...When Urals crude crossed below $50 in April 2025, the Kremlin didn’t just lose money. Rather it lost the mathematical possibility of sustaining its war."

3/3
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(