I realized something interesting about tankies' "The Soviets ended the Holocaust!" rhetoric. By painting the liberation of the camps as valorous due to humanitarianism, as well as centering Jewish victims, these same people are adopting a Western (US) frame, not a Soviet one.
Fetishization of the red Army/Soviet objectives has always been offensive & inaccurate. What's interesting about this *specific* trope is that those who engage in it are revealing their framing of historical events--as well as their assignment of value--is Western in nature
The Soviets did not sell themselves as liberators of oppressed Jewish people, due to antisemitism & other factors. And, given all the red Army had experienced, both during the war & at home, their reaction to victims & camps was fundamentally different than that of Allied forces.
Anyway, it's always irritating to see these tropes. But it's also revealing that people choose to praise the red Army through a Western (US) lens, rather than a Soviet one.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

16 Jun
Mr. Lamar Johnson has spent 26 years in prison for a crime to which other men have confessed. Even local prosecutors think Mr Johnson has been wrongfully convicted. However, he is unable to get a new trial due to the state AG & Supreme Court. news.stlpublicradio.org/show/st-louis-…
Mr. Johnson has been languishing in prison for *years*. I respectfully ask that people retweet his story to put pressure on public officials in Missouri. Please include the name of the AG--Eric Schmitt--in tweets. Schmitt is standing in the way of justice. Get his name trending.
Eric Schmitt-State AG of Missouri--is working to deny an imprisoned man a trial even though other men have admitted to the crime AND local prosecutors think Mr. Johnson was wrongfully convicted. At the very least, Mr. Johnson deserves a trial.
Read 8 tweets
15 Jun
I keep seeing "White Fragility" referenced as the text given to white academics in workshops on diversity, anti-racism, white privilege, etc. Has this book been specifically recommended by Black academics/activists/specialists or did white people just pick it out for themselves?
I am fully supportive of academia taking a very pro-active anti-racism approach that extends far beyond a single day of training. However, when I look at some of the descriptions of this stuff, I wonder about the specifics of the approach (even though I share the common goal)
This kind of activity seems to be designed to mitigate how much POC have to deal w/ white feelings. That's a good goal, but it also seems to have ended up as white people reading a book by a white woman (that has been criticized by Black experts) & talking about white feelings Image
Read 7 tweets
14 Jun
As an anxious person, I'm pretty superstitious, just as a matter of checking all my bases. Yet, despite being scared of things like spilling salt or looking the wrong way at a ladder, I am still willing to say, w/ confidence, that Ukraine joining NATO will not lead to nuclear war
There's a thing called Mutually Assured Destruction. Russia doesn't want it. And if you go on twitter and claim they do, you don't understand the country at all.
Now there's the slightly less hyperbolic claim that Ukraine joining NATO would trigger just a regular war with the U.S. (not nuclear). This is very unlikely. Russia likes proxy wars & micro-aggressions. Militarily & economically, they would be at a disadvantage in a war w/ the US
Read 8 tweets
14 Jun
It's concerning that so many white liberal/progressive commentators are buying into the conservative straw man that people who advance social justice are pitchfork-wielding radicals intent on "canceling" fellow citizens for perceived thought crimes
A few weeks back, I wrote about how conservatives are sneaking in pejorative feelings about social justice by using language that is both vague & charged w/ negative valence. Unfortunately, some in general commentariat are lending this tactic legitimacy salon.com/2021/05/05/how…
These negative perceptions of social justice would not stick as much in the minds of older white liberals if not for the support they're getting from some prestigious writers. In these perceptions, social justice is not just oppressive, but also frivolous theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
Read 12 tweets
13 Jun
I keep seeing this trend where researchers overstate their conclusions & then journalists will render these conclusions even *stronger*. Then, if someone comes in & says, "Well, if we look at the statistical tests. . . .," we look nitpicky, when, in fact, it's pretty important!
An example of this I saw recently was a pre-print where the researchers kept saying they saw a "decrease" in a treatment effect w/ N=5000, when, in fact, most of the "decreases" were not significant. Journalists wrote up these "decreases" as meaningful!
Then, some come in & say, "those tests weren't significant in a sample of 5000, so that's something to consider," & no one cares, b/c the study has already gotten tons of attention. The reaction is almost, "why are you nitpicking this way?"

Because it changes the conclusions!
Read 5 tweets
13 Jun
I've been seeing commentary claiming Trump has been vindicated on Hydroxychloroquine (HQ). I was like, “what’s encouraging this new discourse?” Turns out it is this pre-print and, long story short: no, it does not vindicate Trump or “prove” anything about the effectiveness of HQ.
I’m not an expert in this field & I haven’t combed through this pre-print with a fine tooth comb. However, I can make a few general observations
-1 non-peer reviewed pre-print will never “prove” anything. Nor would a peer-reviewed study! All evidence has to be considered together
-This particular study was observational. Observational research is valuable, but it’s also messy, which makes it even more important to consider *all* the data. This study could be garbage or it could be elegant. But even if it's the latter, it would be far from the final word!
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(