Tl;Dr for anyone who doesn't follow: while still in office, President Trump directed Kurt Olsen - one of the attorneys for Texas in Ken Paxton's attempt to overturn the election - to push the DOJ to file a Supreme Court complaint seeking to overturn the election
Here, btw, is another email from Molly Michael who worked in the White House, Executive Office of the President, attaching the same seditious complaint Image
In which Mark fucking Meadows, specifically from his official WH email, sends DOJ a conspiracy theory about german servers and military vote manipulation. Background on the insanity is from this article

usatoday.com/story/news/fac… ImageImageImage
Rosen and the folks at DOJ were appropriately dismissive, btw (the "last one" is the batshit video, it's referred to lower in the email chain) Image
"Dismissive," btw, is a massive understatement Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Akiva Cohen

Akiva Cohen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AkivaMCohen

10 Jun
The Judge is now patiently trying to get Kleinhandler to understand the difference between saying "I think MLB is wrong about GA voting law" and "I think that means it was bad faith"
Holy shit. Never say "wait a minute, your Honor" to a judge
Kleinhandler just said that MLB was free to cancel the ASG entirely, just not able to move it to a different state
Read 52 tweets
10 Jun
This is both true and false. There's no proof that Israel committed war crimes in Gaza. But evidence is not the same as proof; evidence is "available facts which tend to support a conclusion." There's evidence sufficient to say "it's a war crime unless XYZ"
@elderofziyon is correct, however, that the IDF has (1) claimed to be following the laws of war in their targeting decisions; (2) demonstrated significant attempts to minimize civilian casualties, warranting a level of trust that they are attempting to follow the laws of war; and
(3) proffered explanations that, if true, would mean that they did not commit war crimes. And we (the public) are simply not going to know for certain whether those explanations are true; revealing proof of those claims would threaten IDF sources and methods, so it won't happen.
Read 8 tweets
4 Jun
OK, as promised, a thread on the flaming bag stuffed with feces Mike Lindell and his excellent lawyers at @BTLawNews left on the electronic doorstep of the Minnesota federal court yesterday
And yes, I tagged @BTLawNews (and am tagging their other practices @BTLawLE @BTLawTrade @BTLawDC) for a reason. I'm not sure they understand how rapidly this filing is torpedoing their reputation; I've already seen GC's on here pledging never to send them any business
And that's well deserved. Not only did @BTLawNews @BTLawLE @BTLawTrade @BTLawDC sign up for a morally repugnant assault on American democracy, *but they did a craptastic legal job doing it*. In-house counsel thus gets to stay away for both moral and practical reasons
Read 99 tweets
2 Jun
OMG, what? They filed a *civil rights* claim against MLB moving the All Star game?

People, this is not a thing. It's not even in the same zip code of a thing
Let's count the ways this is not a thing. Long-time readers will probably be able to sing along
Here's who the plaintiff is, in this lawsuit over <checks notes> harm to Atlanta businesses.

A Texas based non-profit whose mission is to highlight the economic impact of bad policy.

Makes sense. Yes, you definitely have standing here. 100%
Read 46 tweets
30 May
1) This is not a bad provision, guys. If you can prove that there were 10K illegal votes in an election won by 9K, you SHOULD be able to void the election

2) That's how most states do it already

3) The proof issues for Trump weren't "how individual voters voted
Judd Legum is freaking out, and more importantly freaking his readers out, but he's dead wrong. This is EXACTLY the standard that got Trump suits tossed in Georgia and Pennsylvania and Arizona and ...
It's not unprecedented. It's not radical. I'm not sure what else is in the bill, and judging by history I'm sure it's got other objectionable provisions, but this isn't one of them. Judd, how do you imagine anyone could ever prove how individuals voted?

Read 6 tweets
28 May
When you absolutely, fundamentally, and enthusiastically refuse to understand Jewish history.

It's not bigotry. It's not particularly specific to Palestinians, or Arabs.

It's 2000 years of persecutions, expulsions, and murders conducted under the auspices of gentile governments
We're done with that. We're not going back to that. And if the best you can offer is "that won't happen this time" or "the world won't let it happen again" ...

Tell that to the Uighurs. And Yazidi. And Darfuri. And Tutsi. And ...
Oops, skipped the Rohingya. My bad.

You get the point.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(